Cargando…

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Technology Intervention to Support Postabortion Care in British Columbia: Phase I

BACKGROUND: Over 30% of women in Canada undergo an abortion. Despite the prevalence of the procedure, stigma surrounding abortion in Canada leads to barriers for women to access this service. The vast majority of care is concentrated in urban settings. There is evidence to support utilization of inn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gill, Roopan, Ogilvie, Gina, Norman, Wendy V, Fitzsimmons, Brian, Maher, Ciana, Renner, Regina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6658228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31144668
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/13387
_version_ 1783438925037043712
author Gill, Roopan
Ogilvie, Gina
Norman, Wendy V
Fitzsimmons, Brian
Maher, Ciana
Renner, Regina
author_facet Gill, Roopan
Ogilvie, Gina
Norman, Wendy V
Fitzsimmons, Brian
Maher, Ciana
Renner, Regina
author_sort Gill, Roopan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Over 30% of women in Canada undergo an abortion. Despite the prevalence of the procedure, stigma surrounding abortion in Canada leads to barriers for women to access this service. The vast majority of care is concentrated in urban settings. There is evidence to support utilization of innovative mobile and other technology solutions to empower women to safely and effectively self-manage aspects of the abortion process. This study is part 1 of a 3-phase study that utilizes user-centered design methodology to develop a digital health solution to specifically support follow-up after an induced surgical abortion. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (1) understand how women at 3 surgical abortion clinics in an urban center of British Columbia utilize their mobile phones to access health care information and (2) understand women’s preferences of content and design of an intervention that will support follow-up care after an induced abortion, including contraceptive use. METHODS: The study design was based on development-evaluation-implementation process from Medical Research Council Framework for Complex Medical Interventions. This was a mixed-methods formative study. Women (aged 14-45 years) were recruited from 3 urban abortion facilities in British Columbia who underwent an induced abortion. Adaptation of validated surveys and using the technology acceptance model and theory of reasoned action, a cross-sectional survey was designed. Interview topics included demographic information; type of wireless device used; cell phone usage; acceptable information to include in a mobile intervention to support women’s abortion care; willingness to use a mobile phone to obtain reproductive health information; optimal strategies to use a mobile intervention to support women; understand preferences for health information resources; and design qualities in a mobile intervention important for ease of use, privacy, and security. Responses to questions in the survey were summarized using descriptive statistics. Qualitative analysis was conducted with NVivo using a thematic analysis approach. This study was approved by the local ethics board. RESULTS: A waiting-room survey was completed by 50 participants, and semistructured interviews were completed with 8 participants. The average age of participants was 26 years. Furthermore, 94% (47/50) owned a smartphone, 85% (41/48) used their personal phones to go online, and 85% would use their cell phone to assist in clinical care. Qualitative analysis demonstrated that women prefer a comprehensive website that included secure email or text notifications to provide tools and resources for emotional well-being, contraceptive decision making, general sexual health, and postprocedure care. CONCLUSIONS: A community-based mixed-methods approach allowed us to understand how women use their cell phones and what women desire in a mobile intervention to support their postabortion care. The findings from this formative phase will assist in the development and testing of a mobile intervention to support follow-up care after an induced surgical abortion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6658228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66582282019-07-31 Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Technology Intervention to Support Postabortion Care in British Columbia: Phase I Gill, Roopan Ogilvie, Gina Norman, Wendy V Fitzsimmons, Brian Maher, Ciana Renner, Regina J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Over 30% of women in Canada undergo an abortion. Despite the prevalence of the procedure, stigma surrounding abortion in Canada leads to barriers for women to access this service. The vast majority of care is concentrated in urban settings. There is evidence to support utilization of innovative mobile and other technology solutions to empower women to safely and effectively self-manage aspects of the abortion process. This study is part 1 of a 3-phase study that utilizes user-centered design methodology to develop a digital health solution to specifically support follow-up after an induced surgical abortion. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (1) understand how women at 3 surgical abortion clinics in an urban center of British Columbia utilize their mobile phones to access health care information and (2) understand women’s preferences of content and design of an intervention that will support follow-up care after an induced abortion, including contraceptive use. METHODS: The study design was based on development-evaluation-implementation process from Medical Research Council Framework for Complex Medical Interventions. This was a mixed-methods formative study. Women (aged 14-45 years) were recruited from 3 urban abortion facilities in British Columbia who underwent an induced abortion. Adaptation of validated surveys and using the technology acceptance model and theory of reasoned action, a cross-sectional survey was designed. Interview topics included demographic information; type of wireless device used; cell phone usage; acceptable information to include in a mobile intervention to support women’s abortion care; willingness to use a mobile phone to obtain reproductive health information; optimal strategies to use a mobile intervention to support women; understand preferences for health information resources; and design qualities in a mobile intervention important for ease of use, privacy, and security. Responses to questions in the survey were summarized using descriptive statistics. Qualitative analysis was conducted with NVivo using a thematic analysis approach. This study was approved by the local ethics board. RESULTS: A waiting-room survey was completed by 50 participants, and semistructured interviews were completed with 8 participants. The average age of participants was 26 years. Furthermore, 94% (47/50) owned a smartphone, 85% (41/48) used their personal phones to go online, and 85% would use their cell phone to assist in clinical care. Qualitative analysis demonstrated that women prefer a comprehensive website that included secure email or text notifications to provide tools and resources for emotional well-being, contraceptive decision making, general sexual health, and postprocedure care. CONCLUSIONS: A community-based mixed-methods approach allowed us to understand how women use their cell phones and what women desire in a mobile intervention to support their postabortion care. The findings from this formative phase will assist in the development and testing of a mobile intervention to support follow-up care after an induced surgical abortion. JMIR Publications 2019-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6658228/ /pubmed/31144668 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/13387 Text en ©Roopan Gill, Gina Ogilvie, Wendy V Norman, Brian Fitzsimmons, Ciana Maher, Regina Renner. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 29.05.2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Gill, Roopan
Ogilvie, Gina
Norman, Wendy V
Fitzsimmons, Brian
Maher, Ciana
Renner, Regina
Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Technology Intervention to Support Postabortion Care in British Columbia: Phase I
title Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Technology Intervention to Support Postabortion Care in British Columbia: Phase I
title_full Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Technology Intervention to Support Postabortion Care in British Columbia: Phase I
title_fullStr Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Technology Intervention to Support Postabortion Care in British Columbia: Phase I
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Technology Intervention to Support Postabortion Care in British Columbia: Phase I
title_short Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Technology Intervention to Support Postabortion Care in British Columbia: Phase I
title_sort feasibility and acceptability of a mobile technology intervention to support postabortion care in british columbia: phase i
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6658228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31144668
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/13387
work_keys_str_mv AT gillroopan feasibilityandacceptabilityofamobiletechnologyinterventiontosupportpostabortioncareinbritishcolumbiaphasei
AT ogilviegina feasibilityandacceptabilityofamobiletechnologyinterventiontosupportpostabortioncareinbritishcolumbiaphasei
AT normanwendyv feasibilityandacceptabilityofamobiletechnologyinterventiontosupportpostabortioncareinbritishcolumbiaphasei
AT fitzsimmonsbrian feasibilityandacceptabilityofamobiletechnologyinterventiontosupportpostabortioncareinbritishcolumbiaphasei
AT maherciana feasibilityandacceptabilityofamobiletechnologyinterventiontosupportpostabortioncareinbritishcolumbiaphasei
AT rennerregina feasibilityandacceptabilityofamobiletechnologyinterventiontosupportpostabortioncareinbritishcolumbiaphasei