Cargando…

Treatment patterns of primary care physicians vs specialists prior to subspecialty urogynaecology referral for women suffering from pelvic floor disorders

BACKGROUND: There are approximately 25% of women in the United States suffering from pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) and this number is predicted to rise. The potential complications and increasing healthcare costs that exist with an operation indicate the importance of conservative treatment options...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prentice, Abigail, Bazzi, Ali Ahmad, Aslam, Muhammad Faisal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6658364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31367545
http://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v9.i2.26
_version_ 1783438950776438784
author Prentice, Abigail
Bazzi, Ali Ahmad
Aslam, Muhammad Faisal
author_facet Prentice, Abigail
Bazzi, Ali Ahmad
Aslam, Muhammad Faisal
author_sort Prentice, Abigail
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are approximately 25% of women in the United States suffering from pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) and this number is predicted to rise. The potential complications and increasing healthcare costs that exist with an operation indicate the importance of conservative treatment options prior to attempting surgery. Considering the prevalence of PFDs, it is important for primary care physician and specialists (obstetricians and gynecologists) to be familiar with the initial work-up and the available conservative treatment options prior to subspecialist (urogynecologist) referral. AIM: To assess the types of treatments that specialists attempted prior to subspecialty referral and determine the differences in referral patterns. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 234 patients from a community teaching hospital referred to a single female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery (FPMRS) provider for PFD. Specialist vs primary care provider (PCP) referrals were compared. Number, length and treatment types were studied using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: There were 184 referrals (78.6%) by specialists and 50 (21.4%) by PCP. Treatment (with Kegel exercises, pessary placements, and anticholinergic medications) was attempted on 51% (n = 26) of the PCP compared to 48% (n = 88) of the specialist referrals prior to FPMRS referral (P = 0.6). There was no significant difference in length of treatment prior to referral for PCPs vs specialists (14 mo vs 16 mo, respectively, P = 0.88). However, there was a significant difference in the patient’s average time with the condition prior to referral (35 mo vs 58 mo for PCP compared to specialist referrals) (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: One half of the patients referred to FPMRS clinic received treatment prior to referral. Thus, specialists and generalists can benefit from education regarding therapies for PFD before subspecialty referral.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6658364
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66583642019-07-31 Treatment patterns of primary care physicians vs specialists prior to subspecialty urogynaecology referral for women suffering from pelvic floor disorders Prentice, Abigail Bazzi, Ali Ahmad Aslam, Muhammad Faisal World J Methodol Retrospective Cohort Study BACKGROUND: There are approximately 25% of women in the United States suffering from pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) and this number is predicted to rise. The potential complications and increasing healthcare costs that exist with an operation indicate the importance of conservative treatment options prior to attempting surgery. Considering the prevalence of PFDs, it is important for primary care physician and specialists (obstetricians and gynecologists) to be familiar with the initial work-up and the available conservative treatment options prior to subspecialist (urogynecologist) referral. AIM: To assess the types of treatments that specialists attempted prior to subspecialty referral and determine the differences in referral patterns. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 234 patients from a community teaching hospital referred to a single female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery (FPMRS) provider for PFD. Specialist vs primary care provider (PCP) referrals were compared. Number, length and treatment types were studied using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: There were 184 referrals (78.6%) by specialists and 50 (21.4%) by PCP. Treatment (with Kegel exercises, pessary placements, and anticholinergic medications) was attempted on 51% (n = 26) of the PCP compared to 48% (n = 88) of the specialist referrals prior to FPMRS referral (P = 0.6). There was no significant difference in length of treatment prior to referral for PCPs vs specialists (14 mo vs 16 mo, respectively, P = 0.88). However, there was a significant difference in the patient’s average time with the condition prior to referral (35 mo vs 58 mo for PCP compared to specialist referrals) (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: One half of the patients referred to FPMRS clinic received treatment prior to referral. Thus, specialists and generalists can benefit from education regarding therapies for PFD before subspecialty referral. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2019-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6658364/ /pubmed/31367545 http://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v9.i2.26 Text en ©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Retrospective Cohort Study
Prentice, Abigail
Bazzi, Ali Ahmad
Aslam, Muhammad Faisal
Treatment patterns of primary care physicians vs specialists prior to subspecialty urogynaecology referral for women suffering from pelvic floor disorders
title Treatment patterns of primary care physicians vs specialists prior to subspecialty urogynaecology referral for women suffering from pelvic floor disorders
title_full Treatment patterns of primary care physicians vs specialists prior to subspecialty urogynaecology referral for women suffering from pelvic floor disorders
title_fullStr Treatment patterns of primary care physicians vs specialists prior to subspecialty urogynaecology referral for women suffering from pelvic floor disorders
title_full_unstemmed Treatment patterns of primary care physicians vs specialists prior to subspecialty urogynaecology referral for women suffering from pelvic floor disorders
title_short Treatment patterns of primary care physicians vs specialists prior to subspecialty urogynaecology referral for women suffering from pelvic floor disorders
title_sort treatment patterns of primary care physicians vs specialists prior to subspecialty urogynaecology referral for women suffering from pelvic floor disorders
topic Retrospective Cohort Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6658364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31367545
http://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v9.i2.26
work_keys_str_mv AT prenticeabigail treatmentpatternsofprimarycarephysiciansvsspecialistspriortosubspecialtyurogynaecologyreferralforwomensufferingfrompelvicfloordisorders
AT bazzialiahmad treatmentpatternsofprimarycarephysiciansvsspecialistspriortosubspecialtyurogynaecologyreferralforwomensufferingfrompelvicfloordisorders
AT aslammuhammadfaisal treatmentpatternsofprimarycarephysiciansvsspecialistspriortosubspecialtyurogynaecologyreferralforwomensufferingfrompelvicfloordisorders