Cargando…

Effect of age on the effectiveness of the first-line standard of care treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: systematic review of observational studies

PURPOSE: Most metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients are elderly. This systematic review identifies and describes observational studies evaluating the influence of age on first-line treatment effectiveness in real-world practice. METHODS: Medline and EMBASE were searched up to May 2016. The in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dagher, Mohammed, Sabidó, Meritxell, Zöllner, York
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6658416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31201484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-019-02948-6
_version_ 1783438962529927168
author Dagher, Mohammed
Sabidó, Meritxell
Zöllner, York
author_facet Dagher, Mohammed
Sabidó, Meritxell
Zöllner, York
author_sort Dagher, Mohammed
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Most metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients are elderly. This systematic review identifies and describes observational studies evaluating the influence of age on first-line treatment effectiveness in real-world practice. METHODS: Medline and EMBASE were searched up to May 2016. The included studies were those that investigated first-line treatment of mCRC and reported age groups and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) or overall response rate (ORR) were included. Studies published before 2008 were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Data were evaluated by age group (< 70 vs. ≥ 70 years; 65–75 vs. ≥ 75 years) and outcome. A pooled survival median was calculated for patients (cutoff = 70 years). RESULTS: In total, 11 articles with 11,063 patients were included. Four studies using a cutoff of 70 years of age reported OS and PFS, and two studies reported ORRs. In terms of OS, all studies showed a higher OS for those < 70 years of age than for those ≥ 70 years of age. PFS did not find differences by age. For ORRs, one study favoured the younger group, while the second study did not differ by age. Based on three studies, the pooled medians for  < 70 years of age and ≥ 70 years of age were the same for PFS (10.2) and were 27.0 and 22.9 for OS, respectively. All included studies were of high or acceptable quality. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that age has no effect on PFS. For ORR, the results were inconsistent between studies. Younger patients in general had better OS, which might be partly explained by more aggressive treatment. This treatment seemed not to be guided by performance status or number of metastatic sites. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00432-019-02948-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6658416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66584162019-08-07 Effect of age on the effectiveness of the first-line standard of care treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: systematic review of observational studies Dagher, Mohammed Sabidó, Meritxell Zöllner, York J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Original Article – Clinical Oncology PURPOSE: Most metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients are elderly. This systematic review identifies and describes observational studies evaluating the influence of age on first-line treatment effectiveness in real-world practice. METHODS: Medline and EMBASE were searched up to May 2016. The included studies were those that investigated first-line treatment of mCRC and reported age groups and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) or overall response rate (ORR) were included. Studies published before 2008 were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Data were evaluated by age group (< 70 vs. ≥ 70 years; 65–75 vs. ≥ 75 years) and outcome. A pooled survival median was calculated for patients (cutoff = 70 years). RESULTS: In total, 11 articles with 11,063 patients were included. Four studies using a cutoff of 70 years of age reported OS and PFS, and two studies reported ORRs. In terms of OS, all studies showed a higher OS for those < 70 years of age than for those ≥ 70 years of age. PFS did not find differences by age. For ORRs, one study favoured the younger group, while the second study did not differ by age. Based on three studies, the pooled medians for  < 70 years of age and ≥ 70 years of age were the same for PFS (10.2) and were 27.0 and 22.9 for OS, respectively. All included studies were of high or acceptable quality. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that age has no effect on PFS. For ORR, the results were inconsistent between studies. Younger patients in general had better OS, which might be partly explained by more aggressive treatment. This treatment seemed not to be guided by performance status or number of metastatic sites. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00432-019-02948-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-06-14 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6658416/ /pubmed/31201484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-019-02948-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article – Clinical Oncology
Dagher, Mohammed
Sabidó, Meritxell
Zöllner, York
Effect of age on the effectiveness of the first-line standard of care treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: systematic review of observational studies
title Effect of age on the effectiveness of the first-line standard of care treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: systematic review of observational studies
title_full Effect of age on the effectiveness of the first-line standard of care treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: systematic review of observational studies
title_fullStr Effect of age on the effectiveness of the first-line standard of care treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: systematic review of observational studies
title_full_unstemmed Effect of age on the effectiveness of the first-line standard of care treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: systematic review of observational studies
title_short Effect of age on the effectiveness of the first-line standard of care treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: systematic review of observational studies
title_sort effect of age on the effectiveness of the first-line standard of care treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: systematic review of observational studies
topic Original Article – Clinical Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6658416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31201484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-019-02948-6
work_keys_str_mv AT daghermohammed effectofageontheeffectivenessofthefirstlinestandardofcaretreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancersystematicreviewofobservationalstudies
AT sabidomeritxell effectofageontheeffectivenessofthefirstlinestandardofcaretreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancersystematicreviewofobservationalstudies
AT zollneryork effectofageontheeffectivenessofthefirstlinestandardofcaretreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancersystematicreviewofobservationalstudies