Cargando…
Manipulation of the microbiome in critical illness—probiotics as a preventive measure against ventilator-associated pneumonia
OBJECTIVE: To describe the possible modes of action of probiotics and provide a systematic review of the current evidence on the efficacy of probiotics to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in critically ill patients. METHODS: We conducted an unrestricted search of the English language me...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6658628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31346841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-019-0238-1 |
_version_ | 1783438996158808064 |
---|---|
author | van Ruissen, Marel C. E. Bos, Lieuwe D. Dickson, Robert P. Dondorp, Arjen M. Schultsz, Constance Schultz, Marcus J. |
author_facet | van Ruissen, Marel C. E. Bos, Lieuwe D. Dickson, Robert P. Dondorp, Arjen M. Schultsz, Constance Schultz, Marcus J. |
author_sort | van Ruissen, Marel C. E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To describe the possible modes of action of probiotics and provide a systematic review of the current evidence on the efficacy of probiotics to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in critically ill patients. METHODS: We conducted an unrestricted search of the English language medical literature. For each individual study, the relative risk of VAP was calculated using the reported primary outcome data. RESULTS: The search identified a total of 72 articles. Eight articles enrolling a total of 1229 patients fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In four trials, the investigators were blinded for the intervention, and two trials used an intention-to-treat analysis. Loss to follow-up with regard to the primary endpoint ranged from 0 to 14% in the intervention groups and from 0 to 16% in the control groups. The incidence of VAP expressed as the percentage of studied patients was reported in seven trials. The incidence of VAP ranged from 4 to 36% in the intervention groups and from 13 to 50% in the control groups. The relative risk for VAP ranged between 0.30 and 1.41. Three trials showed a significant difference in favor of probiotic therapy between the intervention and the control groups. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of VAP tended to be lower in patients treated with probiotics in most trials identified by the systematic search. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies and the low quality of evidence, it remains difficult to draw firm conclusions. The efficacy of preventive probiotics should be studied in more detail in future trials. Application of probiotics for the prevention of VAP seems to be safe with only few side effects reported in the selected trials. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40635-019-0238-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6658628 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66586282019-08-07 Manipulation of the microbiome in critical illness—probiotics as a preventive measure against ventilator-associated pneumonia van Ruissen, Marel C. E. Bos, Lieuwe D. Dickson, Robert P. Dondorp, Arjen M. Schultsz, Constance Schultz, Marcus J. Intensive Care Med Exp Review OBJECTIVE: To describe the possible modes of action of probiotics and provide a systematic review of the current evidence on the efficacy of probiotics to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in critically ill patients. METHODS: We conducted an unrestricted search of the English language medical literature. For each individual study, the relative risk of VAP was calculated using the reported primary outcome data. RESULTS: The search identified a total of 72 articles. Eight articles enrolling a total of 1229 patients fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In four trials, the investigators were blinded for the intervention, and two trials used an intention-to-treat analysis. Loss to follow-up with regard to the primary endpoint ranged from 0 to 14% in the intervention groups and from 0 to 16% in the control groups. The incidence of VAP expressed as the percentage of studied patients was reported in seven trials. The incidence of VAP ranged from 4 to 36% in the intervention groups and from 13 to 50% in the control groups. The relative risk for VAP ranged between 0.30 and 1.41. Three trials showed a significant difference in favor of probiotic therapy between the intervention and the control groups. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of VAP tended to be lower in patients treated with probiotics in most trials identified by the systematic search. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies and the low quality of evidence, it remains difficult to draw firm conclusions. The efficacy of preventive probiotics should be studied in more detail in future trials. Application of probiotics for the prevention of VAP seems to be safe with only few side effects reported in the selected trials. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40635-019-0238-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6658628/ /pubmed/31346841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-019-0238-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review van Ruissen, Marel C. E. Bos, Lieuwe D. Dickson, Robert P. Dondorp, Arjen M. Schultsz, Constance Schultz, Marcus J. Manipulation of the microbiome in critical illness—probiotics as a preventive measure against ventilator-associated pneumonia |
title | Manipulation of the microbiome in critical illness—probiotics as a preventive measure against ventilator-associated pneumonia |
title_full | Manipulation of the microbiome in critical illness—probiotics as a preventive measure against ventilator-associated pneumonia |
title_fullStr | Manipulation of the microbiome in critical illness—probiotics as a preventive measure against ventilator-associated pneumonia |
title_full_unstemmed | Manipulation of the microbiome in critical illness—probiotics as a preventive measure against ventilator-associated pneumonia |
title_short | Manipulation of the microbiome in critical illness—probiotics as a preventive measure against ventilator-associated pneumonia |
title_sort | manipulation of the microbiome in critical illness—probiotics as a preventive measure against ventilator-associated pneumonia |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6658628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31346841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-019-0238-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanruissenmarelce manipulationofthemicrobiomeincriticalillnessprobioticsasapreventivemeasureagainstventilatorassociatedpneumonia AT boslieuwed manipulationofthemicrobiomeincriticalillnessprobioticsasapreventivemeasureagainstventilatorassociatedpneumonia AT dicksonrobertp manipulationofthemicrobiomeincriticalillnessprobioticsasapreventivemeasureagainstventilatorassociatedpneumonia AT dondorparjenm manipulationofthemicrobiomeincriticalillnessprobioticsasapreventivemeasureagainstventilatorassociatedpneumonia AT schultszconstance manipulationofthemicrobiomeincriticalillnessprobioticsasapreventivemeasureagainstventilatorassociatedpneumonia AT schultzmarcusj manipulationofthemicrobiomeincriticalillnessprobioticsasapreventivemeasureagainstventilatorassociatedpneumonia |