Cargando…

Manipulation of the microbiome in critical illness—probiotics as a preventive measure against ventilator-associated pneumonia

OBJECTIVE: To describe the possible modes of action of probiotics and provide a systematic review of the current evidence on the efficacy of probiotics to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in critically ill patients. METHODS: We conducted an unrestricted search of the English language me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Ruissen, Marel C. E., Bos, Lieuwe D., Dickson, Robert P., Dondorp, Arjen M., Schultsz, Constance, Schultz, Marcus J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6658628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31346841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-019-0238-1
_version_ 1783438996158808064
author van Ruissen, Marel C. E.
Bos, Lieuwe D.
Dickson, Robert P.
Dondorp, Arjen M.
Schultsz, Constance
Schultz, Marcus J.
author_facet van Ruissen, Marel C. E.
Bos, Lieuwe D.
Dickson, Robert P.
Dondorp, Arjen M.
Schultsz, Constance
Schultz, Marcus J.
author_sort van Ruissen, Marel C. E.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To describe the possible modes of action of probiotics and provide a systematic review of the current evidence on the efficacy of probiotics to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in critically ill patients. METHODS: We conducted an unrestricted search of the English language medical literature. For each individual study, the relative risk of VAP was calculated using the reported primary outcome data. RESULTS: The search identified a total of 72 articles. Eight articles enrolling a total of 1229 patients fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In four trials, the investigators were blinded for the intervention, and two trials used an intention-to-treat analysis. Loss to follow-up with regard to the primary endpoint ranged from 0 to 14% in the intervention groups and from 0 to 16% in the control groups. The incidence of VAP expressed as the percentage of studied patients was reported in seven trials. The incidence of VAP ranged from 4 to 36% in the intervention groups and from 13 to 50% in the control groups. The relative risk for VAP ranged between 0.30 and 1.41. Three trials showed a significant difference in favor of probiotic therapy between the intervention and the control groups. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of VAP tended to be lower in patients treated with probiotics in most trials identified by the systematic search. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies and the low quality of evidence, it remains difficult to draw firm conclusions. The efficacy of preventive probiotics should be studied in more detail in future trials. Application of probiotics for the prevention of VAP seems to be safe with only few side effects reported in the selected trials. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40635-019-0238-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6658628
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66586282019-08-07 Manipulation of the microbiome in critical illness—probiotics as a preventive measure against ventilator-associated pneumonia van Ruissen, Marel C. E. Bos, Lieuwe D. Dickson, Robert P. Dondorp, Arjen M. Schultsz, Constance Schultz, Marcus J. Intensive Care Med Exp Review OBJECTIVE: To describe the possible modes of action of probiotics and provide a systematic review of the current evidence on the efficacy of probiotics to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in critically ill patients. METHODS: We conducted an unrestricted search of the English language medical literature. For each individual study, the relative risk of VAP was calculated using the reported primary outcome data. RESULTS: The search identified a total of 72 articles. Eight articles enrolling a total of 1229 patients fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In four trials, the investigators were blinded for the intervention, and two trials used an intention-to-treat analysis. Loss to follow-up with regard to the primary endpoint ranged from 0 to 14% in the intervention groups and from 0 to 16% in the control groups. The incidence of VAP expressed as the percentage of studied patients was reported in seven trials. The incidence of VAP ranged from 4 to 36% in the intervention groups and from 13 to 50% in the control groups. The relative risk for VAP ranged between 0.30 and 1.41. Three trials showed a significant difference in favor of probiotic therapy between the intervention and the control groups. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of VAP tended to be lower in patients treated with probiotics in most trials identified by the systematic search. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies and the low quality of evidence, it remains difficult to draw firm conclusions. The efficacy of preventive probiotics should be studied in more detail in future trials. Application of probiotics for the prevention of VAP seems to be safe with only few side effects reported in the selected trials. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40635-019-0238-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6658628/ /pubmed/31346841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-019-0238-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
van Ruissen, Marel C. E.
Bos, Lieuwe D.
Dickson, Robert P.
Dondorp, Arjen M.
Schultsz, Constance
Schultz, Marcus J.
Manipulation of the microbiome in critical illness—probiotics as a preventive measure against ventilator-associated pneumonia
title Manipulation of the microbiome in critical illness—probiotics as a preventive measure against ventilator-associated pneumonia
title_full Manipulation of the microbiome in critical illness—probiotics as a preventive measure against ventilator-associated pneumonia
title_fullStr Manipulation of the microbiome in critical illness—probiotics as a preventive measure against ventilator-associated pneumonia
title_full_unstemmed Manipulation of the microbiome in critical illness—probiotics as a preventive measure against ventilator-associated pneumonia
title_short Manipulation of the microbiome in critical illness—probiotics as a preventive measure against ventilator-associated pneumonia
title_sort manipulation of the microbiome in critical illness—probiotics as a preventive measure against ventilator-associated pneumonia
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6658628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31346841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-019-0238-1
work_keys_str_mv AT vanruissenmarelce manipulationofthemicrobiomeincriticalillnessprobioticsasapreventivemeasureagainstventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT boslieuwed manipulationofthemicrobiomeincriticalillnessprobioticsasapreventivemeasureagainstventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT dicksonrobertp manipulationofthemicrobiomeincriticalillnessprobioticsasapreventivemeasureagainstventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT dondorparjenm manipulationofthemicrobiomeincriticalillnessprobioticsasapreventivemeasureagainstventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT schultszconstance manipulationofthemicrobiomeincriticalillnessprobioticsasapreventivemeasureagainstventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT schultzmarcusj manipulationofthemicrobiomeincriticalillnessprobioticsasapreventivemeasureagainstventilatorassociatedpneumonia