Cargando…

Does Really One in Ten Believe Capital Punishment Exists in a Contemporary European Community Country? An Endorsed, Prereviewed, Preregistered Replication Study and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Till et al. (2016) reported that in an Austrian sample approximately one in ten respondents incorrectly believed that Austria still practices, or recently practiced, the death penalty, and that there is a positive association between the amount of weekly television viewing and this gross...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boch, Magdalena, Tran, Ulrich S., Voracek, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6658835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31379660
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01601
_version_ 1783439024057221120
author Boch, Magdalena
Tran, Ulrich S.
Voracek, Martin
author_facet Boch, Magdalena
Tran, Ulrich S.
Voracek, Martin
author_sort Boch, Magdalena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Till et al. (2016) reported that in an Austrian sample approximately one in ten respondents incorrectly believed that Austria still practices, or recently practiced, the death penalty, and that there is a positive association between the amount of weekly television viewing and this gross misperception of the Austrian justice system. METHODS: An endorsed, prereviewed, preregistered close (N = 597) served to test the veracity of these reported effects. This was coupled with the conceptual extension part, which (a) investigated the potential influence of watching American crime series, (b) accounted for further possible confounds, and (c) tested the generalizability of the effect of television viewing to online streaming. RESULTS: Online survey data (N = 597) replicated the one-in-ten prevalence of incorrect answers with the 5-item death penalty questionnaire used in the original study, but not, when asking directly about Austria’s death penalty practices (prevalence: 0.3%). Younger age, but not the amount of television viewing or online streaming, suggestibility, or preferred TV genre consistently predicted incorrect answers in the death penalty questionnaire. Incorrect answers were Mokken-scalable (i.e., formed a common scale, complying with a non-parametric item response model) and were highly consistent. In contrast to the replication study results, a small meta-analysis of all available evidence (three studies, including the present replication) suggested that the aggregate effect of television viewing nominally was significant, albeit small. CONCLUSION: The replication study yielded mixed results, which indicate the perception of a high prevalence of beliefs that there is capital punishment in a country without death penalty probably is due to a faultily designed questionnaire and thus a research artifact. Also, positive associations of television viewing with such beliefs likely are only small at best.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6658835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66588352019-08-02 Does Really One in Ten Believe Capital Punishment Exists in a Contemporary European Community Country? An Endorsed, Prereviewed, Preregistered Replication Study and Meta-Analysis Boch, Magdalena Tran, Ulrich S. Voracek, Martin Front Psychol Psychology BACKGROUND: Till et al. (2016) reported that in an Austrian sample approximately one in ten respondents incorrectly believed that Austria still practices, or recently practiced, the death penalty, and that there is a positive association between the amount of weekly television viewing and this gross misperception of the Austrian justice system. METHODS: An endorsed, prereviewed, preregistered close (N = 597) served to test the veracity of these reported effects. This was coupled with the conceptual extension part, which (a) investigated the potential influence of watching American crime series, (b) accounted for further possible confounds, and (c) tested the generalizability of the effect of television viewing to online streaming. RESULTS: Online survey data (N = 597) replicated the one-in-ten prevalence of incorrect answers with the 5-item death penalty questionnaire used in the original study, but not, when asking directly about Austria’s death penalty practices (prevalence: 0.3%). Younger age, but not the amount of television viewing or online streaming, suggestibility, or preferred TV genre consistently predicted incorrect answers in the death penalty questionnaire. Incorrect answers were Mokken-scalable (i.e., formed a common scale, complying with a non-parametric item response model) and were highly consistent. In contrast to the replication study results, a small meta-analysis of all available evidence (three studies, including the present replication) suggested that the aggregate effect of television viewing nominally was significant, albeit small. CONCLUSION: The replication study yielded mixed results, which indicate the perception of a high prevalence of beliefs that there is capital punishment in a country without death penalty probably is due to a faultily designed questionnaire and thus a research artifact. Also, positive associations of television viewing with such beliefs likely are only small at best. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6658835/ /pubmed/31379660 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01601 Text en Copyright © 2019 Boch, Tran and Voracek. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Boch, Magdalena
Tran, Ulrich S.
Voracek, Martin
Does Really One in Ten Believe Capital Punishment Exists in a Contemporary European Community Country? An Endorsed, Prereviewed, Preregistered Replication Study and Meta-Analysis
title Does Really One in Ten Believe Capital Punishment Exists in a Contemporary European Community Country? An Endorsed, Prereviewed, Preregistered Replication Study and Meta-Analysis
title_full Does Really One in Ten Believe Capital Punishment Exists in a Contemporary European Community Country? An Endorsed, Prereviewed, Preregistered Replication Study and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Does Really One in Ten Believe Capital Punishment Exists in a Contemporary European Community Country? An Endorsed, Prereviewed, Preregistered Replication Study and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Does Really One in Ten Believe Capital Punishment Exists in a Contemporary European Community Country? An Endorsed, Prereviewed, Preregistered Replication Study and Meta-Analysis
title_short Does Really One in Ten Believe Capital Punishment Exists in a Contemporary European Community Country? An Endorsed, Prereviewed, Preregistered Replication Study and Meta-Analysis
title_sort does really one in ten believe capital punishment exists in a contemporary european community country? an endorsed, prereviewed, preregistered replication study and meta-analysis
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6658835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31379660
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01601
work_keys_str_mv AT bochmagdalena doesreallyoneintenbelievecapitalpunishmentexistsinacontemporaryeuropeancommunitycountryanendorsedprereviewedpreregisteredreplicationstudyandmetaanalysis
AT tranulrichs doesreallyoneintenbelievecapitalpunishmentexistsinacontemporaryeuropeancommunitycountryanendorsedprereviewedpreregisteredreplicationstudyandmetaanalysis
AT voracekmartin doesreallyoneintenbelievecapitalpunishmentexistsinacontemporaryeuropeancommunitycountryanendorsedprereviewedpreregisteredreplicationstudyandmetaanalysis