Cargando…

Antimicrobial Policies in United States Beef Production: Choosing the Right Instruments to Reduce Antimicrobial Use and Resistance Under Structural and Market Constraints

Antimicrobial use (AMU) in animal agriculture contributes to the selection of resistant bacteria, potentially constituting a public health threat. To address antimicrobial resistance, public policies set by governments, as well as intra-sectoral approaches, can be implemented. In this paper, we expl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lhermie, Guillaume, Verteramo Chiu, Leslie, Kaniyamattam, Karun, Tauer, Loren William, Scott, Harvey Morgan, Gröhn, Yrjö Tapio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6658893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31380404
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00245
_version_ 1783439030727213056
author Lhermie, Guillaume
Verteramo Chiu, Leslie
Kaniyamattam, Karun
Tauer, Loren William
Scott, Harvey Morgan
Gröhn, Yrjö Tapio
author_facet Lhermie, Guillaume
Verteramo Chiu, Leslie
Kaniyamattam, Karun
Tauer, Loren William
Scott, Harvey Morgan
Gröhn, Yrjö Tapio
author_sort Lhermie, Guillaume
collection PubMed
description Antimicrobial use (AMU) in animal agriculture contributes to the selection of resistant bacteria, potentially constituting a public health threat. To address antimicrobial resistance, public policies set by governments, as well as intra-sectoral approaches, can be implemented. In this paper, we explore how common policy instruments such as regulations, economic incentives, and voluntary agreements could help reduce AMU in beef production. We first describe the structure of the beef supply chain which directly influences the choice of policy instruments. We describe how externalities and imperfect information affect this system. We then discuss how five policy instruments would each perform to achieve a reduction in AMU. Bovine respiratory disease complex (BRD) represents the major driver of AMU in beef production; consequently, reducing its incidence would decrease significantly the amounts of antimicrobials administered. We consider control options for BRD at different stages of the beef supply chain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6658893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66588932019-08-02 Antimicrobial Policies in United States Beef Production: Choosing the Right Instruments to Reduce Antimicrobial Use and Resistance Under Structural and Market Constraints Lhermie, Guillaume Verteramo Chiu, Leslie Kaniyamattam, Karun Tauer, Loren William Scott, Harvey Morgan Gröhn, Yrjö Tapio Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Antimicrobial use (AMU) in animal agriculture contributes to the selection of resistant bacteria, potentially constituting a public health threat. To address antimicrobial resistance, public policies set by governments, as well as intra-sectoral approaches, can be implemented. In this paper, we explore how common policy instruments such as regulations, economic incentives, and voluntary agreements could help reduce AMU in beef production. We first describe the structure of the beef supply chain which directly influences the choice of policy instruments. We describe how externalities and imperfect information affect this system. We then discuss how five policy instruments would each perform to achieve a reduction in AMU. Bovine respiratory disease complex (BRD) represents the major driver of AMU in beef production; consequently, reducing its incidence would decrease significantly the amounts of antimicrobials administered. We consider control options for BRD at different stages of the beef supply chain. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6658893/ /pubmed/31380404 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00245 Text en Copyright © 2019 Lhermie, Verteramo Chiu, Kaniyamattam, Tauer, Scott and Gröhn. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Lhermie, Guillaume
Verteramo Chiu, Leslie
Kaniyamattam, Karun
Tauer, Loren William
Scott, Harvey Morgan
Gröhn, Yrjö Tapio
Antimicrobial Policies in United States Beef Production: Choosing the Right Instruments to Reduce Antimicrobial Use and Resistance Under Structural and Market Constraints
title Antimicrobial Policies in United States Beef Production: Choosing the Right Instruments to Reduce Antimicrobial Use and Resistance Under Structural and Market Constraints
title_full Antimicrobial Policies in United States Beef Production: Choosing the Right Instruments to Reduce Antimicrobial Use and Resistance Under Structural and Market Constraints
title_fullStr Antimicrobial Policies in United States Beef Production: Choosing the Right Instruments to Reduce Antimicrobial Use and Resistance Under Structural and Market Constraints
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial Policies in United States Beef Production: Choosing the Right Instruments to Reduce Antimicrobial Use and Resistance Under Structural and Market Constraints
title_short Antimicrobial Policies in United States Beef Production: Choosing the Right Instruments to Reduce Antimicrobial Use and Resistance Under Structural and Market Constraints
title_sort antimicrobial policies in united states beef production: choosing the right instruments to reduce antimicrobial use and resistance under structural and market constraints
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6658893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31380404
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00245
work_keys_str_mv AT lhermieguillaume antimicrobialpoliciesinunitedstatesbeefproductionchoosingtherightinstrumentstoreduceantimicrobialuseandresistanceunderstructuralandmarketconstraints
AT verteramochiuleslie antimicrobialpoliciesinunitedstatesbeefproductionchoosingtherightinstrumentstoreduceantimicrobialuseandresistanceunderstructuralandmarketconstraints
AT kaniyamattamkarun antimicrobialpoliciesinunitedstatesbeefproductionchoosingtherightinstrumentstoreduceantimicrobialuseandresistanceunderstructuralandmarketconstraints
AT tauerlorenwilliam antimicrobialpoliciesinunitedstatesbeefproductionchoosingtherightinstrumentstoreduceantimicrobialuseandresistanceunderstructuralandmarketconstraints
AT scottharveymorgan antimicrobialpoliciesinunitedstatesbeefproductionchoosingtherightinstrumentstoreduceantimicrobialuseandresistanceunderstructuralandmarketconstraints
AT grohnyrjotapio antimicrobialpoliciesinunitedstatesbeefproductionchoosingtherightinstrumentstoreduceantimicrobialuseandresistanceunderstructuralandmarketconstraints