Cargando…

Comparison of tooth movement and biological response in corticotomy and micro-osteoperforation in rabbits

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of tooth movement and histologic changes with different corticotomy designs and micro-osteoperforation in rabbits. METHODS: The sample consisted of 24 rabbits divided into three experimental groups (triangular corticotomy [TC] and indentati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Junghan, Kook, Yoon-Ah, Bayome, Mohamed, Park, Jae Hyun, Lee, Won, Choi, Hojae, Abbas, Noha H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Association of Orthodontists 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6658902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31367575
http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2019.49.4.205
_version_ 1783439032936562688
author Kim, Junghan
Kook, Yoon-Ah
Bayome, Mohamed
Park, Jae Hyun
Lee, Won
Choi, Hojae
Abbas, Noha H.
author_facet Kim, Junghan
Kook, Yoon-Ah
Bayome, Mohamed
Park, Jae Hyun
Lee, Won
Choi, Hojae
Abbas, Noha H.
author_sort Kim, Junghan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of tooth movement and histologic changes with different corticotomy designs and micro-osteoperforation in rabbits. METHODS: The sample consisted of 24 rabbits divided into three experimental groups (triangular corticotomy [TC] and indentation corticotomy [IC] with flap, and flapless micro-osteoperforations [MP]) and a control. A traction force of 100 cN was applied by connecting the first premolars to the incisors. The amount of tooth movement was measured. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to assess differences in tooth movement between the groups. Micro-computed tomography, hematoxylin and eosin staining, and tartrate-resistant acidic phosphatase (TRAP) analysis were performed. Analysis of variance was applied to assess differences in TRAP-positive osteoclast count between the groups. RESULTS: The amount of tooth movement increased by 46.5% and 32.0% in the IC and MP groups, respectively, while the bone fraction analysis showed 69.7% and 8.5% less mineralization compared to the control. There were no significant intergroup differences in the number of TRAP-positive osteoclasts. CONCLUSIONS: The micro-osteoperforation group showed no significant differences in the amount of tooth movement compared to the corticotomy groups, nor in the TRAP-positive osteoclast count compared to both corticotomy groups and control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6658902
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Korean Association of Orthodontists
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66589022019-07-31 Comparison of tooth movement and biological response in corticotomy and micro-osteoperforation in rabbits Kim, Junghan Kook, Yoon-Ah Bayome, Mohamed Park, Jae Hyun Lee, Won Choi, Hojae Abbas, Noha H. Korean J Orthod Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of tooth movement and histologic changes with different corticotomy designs and micro-osteoperforation in rabbits. METHODS: The sample consisted of 24 rabbits divided into three experimental groups (triangular corticotomy [TC] and indentation corticotomy [IC] with flap, and flapless micro-osteoperforations [MP]) and a control. A traction force of 100 cN was applied by connecting the first premolars to the incisors. The amount of tooth movement was measured. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to assess differences in tooth movement between the groups. Micro-computed tomography, hematoxylin and eosin staining, and tartrate-resistant acidic phosphatase (TRAP) analysis were performed. Analysis of variance was applied to assess differences in TRAP-positive osteoclast count between the groups. RESULTS: The amount of tooth movement increased by 46.5% and 32.0% in the IC and MP groups, respectively, while the bone fraction analysis showed 69.7% and 8.5% less mineralization compared to the control. There were no significant intergroup differences in the number of TRAP-positive osteoclasts. CONCLUSIONS: The micro-osteoperforation group showed no significant differences in the amount of tooth movement compared to the corticotomy groups, nor in the TRAP-positive osteoclast count compared to both corticotomy groups and control. Korean Association of Orthodontists 2019-07 2019-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6658902/ /pubmed/31367575 http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2019.49.4.205 Text en © 2019 The Korean Association of Orthodontists. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Junghan
Kook, Yoon-Ah
Bayome, Mohamed
Park, Jae Hyun
Lee, Won
Choi, Hojae
Abbas, Noha H.
Comparison of tooth movement and biological response in corticotomy and micro-osteoperforation in rabbits
title Comparison of tooth movement and biological response in corticotomy and micro-osteoperforation in rabbits
title_full Comparison of tooth movement and biological response in corticotomy and micro-osteoperforation in rabbits
title_fullStr Comparison of tooth movement and biological response in corticotomy and micro-osteoperforation in rabbits
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of tooth movement and biological response in corticotomy and micro-osteoperforation in rabbits
title_short Comparison of tooth movement and biological response in corticotomy and micro-osteoperforation in rabbits
title_sort comparison of tooth movement and biological response in corticotomy and micro-osteoperforation in rabbits
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6658902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31367575
http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2019.49.4.205
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjunghan comparisonoftoothmovementandbiologicalresponseincorticotomyandmicroosteoperforationinrabbits
AT kookyoonah comparisonoftoothmovementandbiologicalresponseincorticotomyandmicroosteoperforationinrabbits
AT bayomemohamed comparisonoftoothmovementandbiologicalresponseincorticotomyandmicroosteoperforationinrabbits
AT parkjaehyun comparisonoftoothmovementandbiologicalresponseincorticotomyandmicroosteoperforationinrabbits
AT leewon comparisonoftoothmovementandbiologicalresponseincorticotomyandmicroosteoperforationinrabbits
AT choihojae comparisonoftoothmovementandbiologicalresponseincorticotomyandmicroosteoperforationinrabbits
AT abbasnohah comparisonoftoothmovementandbiologicalresponseincorticotomyandmicroosteoperforationinrabbits