Cargando…

Evaluation of a Simple and Safe Tumor Drilling Technique to Potentiate the Effect of Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian, Tubal, and Peritoneal Cancer: A Matched Retrospective Cohort Study

Frontline intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPCT) in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer has been well established. However, the role of second-line IPCT is yet to be confirmed. With a view to implementing IPCT to treat recurrent disease, a prerequisite is to perform a cytoreductive procedure to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chao, Wei-Ting, Chien, Ching-Hui, Lai, Chung-Ru, Wu, Hui-Ju, Chuang, Chi-Mu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6659185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31343898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073274819863778
_version_ 1783439082635919360
author Chao, Wei-Ting
Chien, Ching-Hui
Lai, Chung-Ru
Wu, Hui-Ju
Chuang, Chi-Mu
author_facet Chao, Wei-Ting
Chien, Ching-Hui
Lai, Chung-Ru
Wu, Hui-Ju
Chuang, Chi-Mu
author_sort Chao, Wei-Ting
collection PubMed
description Frontline intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPCT) in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer has been well established. However, the role of second-line IPCT is yet to be confirmed. With a view to implementing IPCT to treat recurrent disease, a prerequisite is to perform a cytoreductive procedure to minimize residual tumor size. However, the role of cytoreductive procedure is still in debate due to a higher chance of complications. A matched retrospective cohort study was conducted. From 2008 to 2015, we adopted a relatively simple and safe tumor drilling technique to maximize tumor exposure to second-line IPCT. Patients who received tumor drilling followed by second-line IPCT constituted the cohort group. Concurrently, patients who received standard second-line systemic chemotherapy were selected as the comparison group. After propensity score matching, 85 patients in each group entered into the final analysis. The median progression-free survival was 7.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.2-7.8) for the cohort group versus 4.1 months (95% CI, 4.0-4.3) for the comparison group (hazard ratio = 0.25 [95% CI, 0.17-0.36]; P < .001, by log-rank test). The median overall survival was 33.6 months (32.1-36.6) for the cohort group versus 25.9 months (20.5-26.9) for the comparison group (hazard ratio = 0.33 [95% CI, 0.23-0.48]; P < .001, by log-rank test). Toxicities in the cohort group were not different from those that were published in reports of IPCT for ovarian cancer. The most commonly observed toxicity was gastrointestinal origin (51.7%), and it may be attributed to the intraperitoneal pharmacokinetic clearance of cisplatin and taxol and we also discussed the mechanism of gastrointestinal toxicity. Tumor drilling followed by second-line IPCT may confer a survival advantage over standard second-line systemic chemotherapy in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6659185
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66591852019-08-05 Evaluation of a Simple and Safe Tumor Drilling Technique to Potentiate the Effect of Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian, Tubal, and Peritoneal Cancer: A Matched Retrospective Cohort Study Chao, Wei-Ting Chien, Ching-Hui Lai, Chung-Ru Wu, Hui-Ju Chuang, Chi-Mu Cancer Control Research Article Frontline intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPCT) in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer has been well established. However, the role of second-line IPCT is yet to be confirmed. With a view to implementing IPCT to treat recurrent disease, a prerequisite is to perform a cytoreductive procedure to minimize residual tumor size. However, the role of cytoreductive procedure is still in debate due to a higher chance of complications. A matched retrospective cohort study was conducted. From 2008 to 2015, we adopted a relatively simple and safe tumor drilling technique to maximize tumor exposure to second-line IPCT. Patients who received tumor drilling followed by second-line IPCT constituted the cohort group. Concurrently, patients who received standard second-line systemic chemotherapy were selected as the comparison group. After propensity score matching, 85 patients in each group entered into the final analysis. The median progression-free survival was 7.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.2-7.8) for the cohort group versus 4.1 months (95% CI, 4.0-4.3) for the comparison group (hazard ratio = 0.25 [95% CI, 0.17-0.36]; P < .001, by log-rank test). The median overall survival was 33.6 months (32.1-36.6) for the cohort group versus 25.9 months (20.5-26.9) for the comparison group (hazard ratio = 0.33 [95% CI, 0.23-0.48]; P < .001, by log-rank test). Toxicities in the cohort group were not different from those that were published in reports of IPCT for ovarian cancer. The most commonly observed toxicity was gastrointestinal origin (51.7%), and it may be attributed to the intraperitoneal pharmacokinetic clearance of cisplatin and taxol and we also discussed the mechanism of gastrointestinal toxicity. Tumor drilling followed by second-line IPCT may confer a survival advantage over standard second-line systemic chemotherapy in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer. SAGE Publications 2019-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6659185/ /pubmed/31343898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073274819863778 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Research Article
Chao, Wei-Ting
Chien, Ching-Hui
Lai, Chung-Ru
Wu, Hui-Ju
Chuang, Chi-Mu
Evaluation of a Simple and Safe Tumor Drilling Technique to Potentiate the Effect of Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian, Tubal, and Peritoneal Cancer: A Matched Retrospective Cohort Study
title Evaluation of a Simple and Safe Tumor Drilling Technique to Potentiate the Effect of Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian, Tubal, and Peritoneal Cancer: A Matched Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full Evaluation of a Simple and Safe Tumor Drilling Technique to Potentiate the Effect of Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian, Tubal, and Peritoneal Cancer: A Matched Retrospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Evaluation of a Simple and Safe Tumor Drilling Technique to Potentiate the Effect of Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian, Tubal, and Peritoneal Cancer: A Matched Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a Simple and Safe Tumor Drilling Technique to Potentiate the Effect of Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian, Tubal, and Peritoneal Cancer: A Matched Retrospective Cohort Study
title_short Evaluation of a Simple and Safe Tumor Drilling Technique to Potentiate the Effect of Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian, Tubal, and Peritoneal Cancer: A Matched Retrospective Cohort Study
title_sort evaluation of a simple and safe tumor drilling technique to potentiate the effect of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancer: a matched retrospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6659185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31343898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073274819863778
work_keys_str_mv AT chaoweiting evaluationofasimpleandsafetumordrillingtechniquetopotentiatetheeffectofintraperitonealchemotherapyinthetreatmentofrecurrentepithelialovariantubalandperitonealcanceramatchedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT chienchinghui evaluationofasimpleandsafetumordrillingtechniquetopotentiatetheeffectofintraperitonealchemotherapyinthetreatmentofrecurrentepithelialovariantubalandperitonealcanceramatchedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT laichungru evaluationofasimpleandsafetumordrillingtechniquetopotentiatetheeffectofintraperitonealchemotherapyinthetreatmentofrecurrentepithelialovariantubalandperitonealcanceramatchedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT wuhuiju evaluationofasimpleandsafetumordrillingtechniquetopotentiatetheeffectofintraperitonealchemotherapyinthetreatmentofrecurrentepithelialovariantubalandperitonealcanceramatchedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT chuangchimu evaluationofasimpleandsafetumordrillingtechniquetopotentiatetheeffectofintraperitonealchemotherapyinthetreatmentofrecurrentepithelialovariantubalandperitonealcanceramatchedretrospectivecohortstudy