Cargando…

Integrated liaison psychiatry services in England: a qualitative study of the views of liaison practitioners and acute hospital staffs from four distinctly different kinds of liaison service

BACKGROUND: Liaison psychiatry services provide mental health care for patients in physical healthcare (usually acute hospital) settings including emergency departments. Liaison work involves close collaboration with acute hospital staff so that high quality care can be provided. Services however ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jasmin, Keeble, Walker, Andrew, Guthrie, Elspeth, Trigwell, Peter, Quirk, Alan, Hewison, Jenny, Murray, Carolyn Czoski, House, Allan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6659268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31345212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4356-y
_version_ 1783439101349855232
author Jasmin, Keeble
Walker, Andrew
Guthrie, Elspeth
Trigwell, Peter
Quirk, Alan
Hewison, Jenny
Murray, Carolyn Czoski
House, Allan
author_facet Jasmin, Keeble
Walker, Andrew
Guthrie, Elspeth
Trigwell, Peter
Quirk, Alan
Hewison, Jenny
Murray, Carolyn Czoski
House, Allan
author_sort Jasmin, Keeble
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Liaison psychiatry services provide mental health care for patients in physical healthcare (usually acute hospital) settings including emergency departments. Liaison work involves close collaboration with acute hospital staff so that high quality care can be provided. Services however are patchy, relatively underfunded, heterogeneous and poorly integrated into acute hospital care pathways. METHODS: We carried out in-depth semi-structured interviews with 73 liaison psychiatry and acute hospital staff from 11 different acute hospitals in England. The 11 hospitals were purposively sample to represent hospitals in which four different types of liaison services operated. Staff were identified to ensure diversity according to professional background, sub-specialism within the team, and whether they had a clinical or managerial focus. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. The data were analysed using a best-fit framework analysis. RESULTS: Several key themes emerged in relation to facilitators and barriers to the effective delivery of integrated services. There were problems with continuity of care across the secondary-primary interface; a lack of mental health resources in primary care to support discharge; a lack of shared information systems; a disproportionate length of time spent recording information as opposed to face to face patient contact; and a lack of a shared vision of care. Relatively few facilitators were identified although interviewees reported a focus on patient care. Similar problems were identified across different liaison service types. CONCLUSIONS: The problems that we have identified need to be addressed by both liaison and acute hospital teams, managers and funders, if high quality integrated physical and mental health care is to be provided in the acute hospital setting. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-4356-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6659268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66592682019-08-01 Integrated liaison psychiatry services in England: a qualitative study of the views of liaison practitioners and acute hospital staffs from four distinctly different kinds of liaison service Jasmin, Keeble Walker, Andrew Guthrie, Elspeth Trigwell, Peter Quirk, Alan Hewison, Jenny Murray, Carolyn Czoski House, Allan BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Liaison psychiatry services provide mental health care for patients in physical healthcare (usually acute hospital) settings including emergency departments. Liaison work involves close collaboration with acute hospital staff so that high quality care can be provided. Services however are patchy, relatively underfunded, heterogeneous and poorly integrated into acute hospital care pathways. METHODS: We carried out in-depth semi-structured interviews with 73 liaison psychiatry and acute hospital staff from 11 different acute hospitals in England. The 11 hospitals were purposively sample to represent hospitals in which four different types of liaison services operated. Staff were identified to ensure diversity according to professional background, sub-specialism within the team, and whether they had a clinical or managerial focus. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. The data were analysed using a best-fit framework analysis. RESULTS: Several key themes emerged in relation to facilitators and barriers to the effective delivery of integrated services. There were problems with continuity of care across the secondary-primary interface; a lack of mental health resources in primary care to support discharge; a lack of shared information systems; a disproportionate length of time spent recording information as opposed to face to face patient contact; and a lack of a shared vision of care. Relatively few facilitators were identified although interviewees reported a focus on patient care. Similar problems were identified across different liaison service types. CONCLUSIONS: The problems that we have identified need to be addressed by both liaison and acute hospital teams, managers and funders, if high quality integrated physical and mental health care is to be provided in the acute hospital setting. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-4356-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6659268/ /pubmed/31345212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4356-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jasmin, Keeble
Walker, Andrew
Guthrie, Elspeth
Trigwell, Peter
Quirk, Alan
Hewison, Jenny
Murray, Carolyn Czoski
House, Allan
Integrated liaison psychiatry services in England: a qualitative study of the views of liaison practitioners and acute hospital staffs from four distinctly different kinds of liaison service
title Integrated liaison psychiatry services in England: a qualitative study of the views of liaison practitioners and acute hospital staffs from four distinctly different kinds of liaison service
title_full Integrated liaison psychiatry services in England: a qualitative study of the views of liaison practitioners and acute hospital staffs from four distinctly different kinds of liaison service
title_fullStr Integrated liaison psychiatry services in England: a qualitative study of the views of liaison practitioners and acute hospital staffs from four distinctly different kinds of liaison service
title_full_unstemmed Integrated liaison psychiatry services in England: a qualitative study of the views of liaison practitioners and acute hospital staffs from four distinctly different kinds of liaison service
title_short Integrated liaison psychiatry services in England: a qualitative study of the views of liaison practitioners and acute hospital staffs from four distinctly different kinds of liaison service
title_sort integrated liaison psychiatry services in england: a qualitative study of the views of liaison practitioners and acute hospital staffs from four distinctly different kinds of liaison service
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6659268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31345212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4356-y
work_keys_str_mv AT jasminkeeble integratedliaisonpsychiatryservicesinenglandaqualitativestudyoftheviewsofliaisonpractitionersandacutehospitalstaffsfromfourdistinctlydifferentkindsofliaisonservice
AT walkerandrew integratedliaisonpsychiatryservicesinenglandaqualitativestudyoftheviewsofliaisonpractitionersandacutehospitalstaffsfromfourdistinctlydifferentkindsofliaisonservice
AT guthrieelspeth integratedliaisonpsychiatryservicesinenglandaqualitativestudyoftheviewsofliaisonpractitionersandacutehospitalstaffsfromfourdistinctlydifferentkindsofliaisonservice
AT trigwellpeter integratedliaisonpsychiatryservicesinenglandaqualitativestudyoftheviewsofliaisonpractitionersandacutehospitalstaffsfromfourdistinctlydifferentkindsofliaisonservice
AT quirkalan integratedliaisonpsychiatryservicesinenglandaqualitativestudyoftheviewsofliaisonpractitionersandacutehospitalstaffsfromfourdistinctlydifferentkindsofliaisonservice
AT hewisonjenny integratedliaisonpsychiatryservicesinenglandaqualitativestudyoftheviewsofliaisonpractitionersandacutehospitalstaffsfromfourdistinctlydifferentkindsofliaisonservice
AT murraycarolynczoski integratedliaisonpsychiatryservicesinenglandaqualitativestudyoftheviewsofliaisonpractitionersandacutehospitalstaffsfromfourdistinctlydifferentkindsofliaisonservice
AT houseallan integratedliaisonpsychiatryservicesinenglandaqualitativestudyoftheviewsofliaisonpractitionersandacutehospitalstaffsfromfourdistinctlydifferentkindsofliaisonservice