Cargando…

Exploring the impact of efficacy messages on cessation-related outcomes using Ecological Momentary Assessment

INTRODUCTION: Observational studies indicate that cigarette package inserts with efficacy messages about the benefits of quitting (i.e. response efficacy) and recommendations for successful cessation increase smokers’ self-efficacy to quit and promote sustained cessation. However, the effects of ins...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lambert, Victoria, Ferguson, Stuart G., Niederdeppe, Jeff, Hammond, David, Hardin, James W., Thrasher, James F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID) 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6659513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31516442
http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tid/94460
_version_ 1783439149464813568
author Lambert, Victoria
Ferguson, Stuart G.
Niederdeppe, Jeff
Hammond, David
Hardin, James W.
Thrasher, James F.
author_facet Lambert, Victoria
Ferguson, Stuart G.
Niederdeppe, Jeff
Hammond, David
Hardin, James W.
Thrasher, James F.
author_sort Lambert, Victoria
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Observational studies indicate that cigarette package inserts with efficacy messages about the benefits of quitting (i.e. response efficacy) and recommendations for successful cessation increase smokers’ self-efficacy to quit and promote sustained cessation. However, the effects of inserts with such efficacy messages have not been studied using experimental designs. This study used ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to assess smokers’ responses to efficacy inserts. METHODS: In a randomized case-crossover study among smokers from the United States (n=23), participants received a one-week supply of cigarettes with efficacy inserts and a one-week supply without any inserts, and were randomized to use the packs with inserts on either the first or second week of the study. For 14 consecutive days, participants used a smartphone to answer brief surveys on cessation-related variables during smoking sessions and at the beginning of each day. Multilevel mixed-effects linear and logistic regression models compared responses during the insert period to those of the non-insert period. RESULTS: The insert period was associated with greater desire to quit (b=0.21, p=0.012), motivation to quit (b=0.18, p=0.001), self-efficacy to cut down (b=0.26, p<0.001) and to quit (b=0.28, p<0.000), and response efficacy/perceived benefits of quitting (b=0.13, p=0.012). Insert exposure was not significantly associated with forgoing cigarettes (OR=1.9, p=0.2) CONCLUSIONS: Results from this EMA study suggest that inserts with efficacy messages may promote determinants of smoking cessation. This is consistent with observational research in Canada, which is the only country to use inserts with efficacy messages as well as pictorial warnings about smoking risks on the outside of packs. Future studies should assess the extent to which efficacy inserts can not only be used to communicate health information to smokers but also work in synergy with pictorial warnings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6659513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66595132019-09-12 Exploring the impact of efficacy messages on cessation-related outcomes using Ecological Momentary Assessment Lambert, Victoria Ferguson, Stuart G. Niederdeppe, Jeff Hammond, David Hardin, James W. Thrasher, James F. Tob Induc Dis Short Report INTRODUCTION: Observational studies indicate that cigarette package inserts with efficacy messages about the benefits of quitting (i.e. response efficacy) and recommendations for successful cessation increase smokers’ self-efficacy to quit and promote sustained cessation. However, the effects of inserts with such efficacy messages have not been studied using experimental designs. This study used ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to assess smokers’ responses to efficacy inserts. METHODS: In a randomized case-crossover study among smokers from the United States (n=23), participants received a one-week supply of cigarettes with efficacy inserts and a one-week supply without any inserts, and were randomized to use the packs with inserts on either the first or second week of the study. For 14 consecutive days, participants used a smartphone to answer brief surveys on cessation-related variables during smoking sessions and at the beginning of each day. Multilevel mixed-effects linear and logistic regression models compared responses during the insert period to those of the non-insert period. RESULTS: The insert period was associated with greater desire to quit (b=0.21, p=0.012), motivation to quit (b=0.18, p=0.001), self-efficacy to cut down (b=0.26, p<0.001) and to quit (b=0.28, p<0.000), and response efficacy/perceived benefits of quitting (b=0.13, p=0.012). Insert exposure was not significantly associated with forgoing cigarettes (OR=1.9, p=0.2) CONCLUSIONS: Results from this EMA study suggest that inserts with efficacy messages may promote determinants of smoking cessation. This is consistent with observational research in Canada, which is the only country to use inserts with efficacy messages as well as pictorial warnings about smoking risks on the outside of packs. Future studies should assess the extent to which efficacy inserts can not only be used to communicate health information to smokers but also work in synergy with pictorial warnings. European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID) 2018-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6659513/ /pubmed/31516442 http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tid/94460 Text en © 2018 Lambert V https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Short Report
Lambert, Victoria
Ferguson, Stuart G.
Niederdeppe, Jeff
Hammond, David
Hardin, James W.
Thrasher, James F.
Exploring the impact of efficacy messages on cessation-related outcomes using Ecological Momentary Assessment
title Exploring the impact of efficacy messages on cessation-related outcomes using Ecological Momentary Assessment
title_full Exploring the impact of efficacy messages on cessation-related outcomes using Ecological Momentary Assessment
title_fullStr Exploring the impact of efficacy messages on cessation-related outcomes using Ecological Momentary Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the impact of efficacy messages on cessation-related outcomes using Ecological Momentary Assessment
title_short Exploring the impact of efficacy messages on cessation-related outcomes using Ecological Momentary Assessment
title_sort exploring the impact of efficacy messages on cessation-related outcomes using ecological momentary assessment
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6659513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31516442
http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tid/94460
work_keys_str_mv AT lambertvictoria exploringtheimpactofefficacymessagesoncessationrelatedoutcomesusingecologicalmomentaryassessment
AT fergusonstuartg exploringtheimpactofefficacymessagesoncessationrelatedoutcomesusingecologicalmomentaryassessment
AT niederdeppejeff exploringtheimpactofefficacymessagesoncessationrelatedoutcomesusingecologicalmomentaryassessment
AT hammonddavid exploringtheimpactofefficacymessagesoncessationrelatedoutcomesusingecologicalmomentaryassessment
AT hardinjamesw exploringtheimpactofefficacymessagesoncessationrelatedoutcomesusingecologicalmomentaryassessment
AT thrasherjamesf exploringtheimpactofefficacymessagesoncessationrelatedoutcomesusingecologicalmomentaryassessment