Cargando…

Informed consent and community engagement in open field research: lessons for gene drive science

BACKGROUND: The development of the CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing system has generated new possibilities for the use of gene drive constructs to reduce or suppress mosquito populations to levels that do not support disease transmission. Despite this prospect, social resistance to genetically modified orga...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Singh, Jerome Amir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6660705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31351474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0389-3
_version_ 1783439354209763328
author Singh, Jerome Amir
author_facet Singh, Jerome Amir
author_sort Singh, Jerome Amir
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The development of the CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing system has generated new possibilities for the use of gene drive constructs to reduce or suppress mosquito populations to levels that do not support disease transmission. Despite this prospect, social resistance to genetically modified organisms remains high. Gene drive open field research thus raises important questions regarding what is owed to those who may not consent to such research, or those could be affected by the proposed research, but whose consent is not solicited. The precise circumstances under which informed consent must be obtained, and from whom, requires careful consideration. Furthermore, appropriate engagement processes should be central to any introduction of genetically modified mosquitos in proposed target settings. DISCUSSION: In this work, international guidance documents on informed consent and engagement are reviewed and applied to the genetically modified mosquito research context. Five analogous research endeavours that involve area-wide / open field experiments are reviewed. The approach of each in respect to the solicitation of individual informed consent and community engagement are highlighted. CONCLUSIONS: While the solicitation of individual informed consent in host settings of gene drive field trials may not be possible or feasible in some instances, local community and stakeholder engagement will be key to building trust towards the proposed conduct of such research. In this regard, the approaches taken by investigators and sponsors of political science field research and weather modification field research should be avoided. Rather, proponents of gene drive field research should look to the Eliminate Dengue field trials, cluster randomised trials, and pragmatic clinical trials for guidance regarding how the solicitation of individual informed consent of host communities ought to be managed, and how these communities ought to be engaged.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6660705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66607052019-08-01 Informed consent and community engagement in open field research: lessons for gene drive science Singh, Jerome Amir BMC Med Ethics Debate BACKGROUND: The development of the CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing system has generated new possibilities for the use of gene drive constructs to reduce or suppress mosquito populations to levels that do not support disease transmission. Despite this prospect, social resistance to genetically modified organisms remains high. Gene drive open field research thus raises important questions regarding what is owed to those who may not consent to such research, or those could be affected by the proposed research, but whose consent is not solicited. The precise circumstances under which informed consent must be obtained, and from whom, requires careful consideration. Furthermore, appropriate engagement processes should be central to any introduction of genetically modified mosquitos in proposed target settings. DISCUSSION: In this work, international guidance documents on informed consent and engagement are reviewed and applied to the genetically modified mosquito research context. Five analogous research endeavours that involve area-wide / open field experiments are reviewed. The approach of each in respect to the solicitation of individual informed consent and community engagement are highlighted. CONCLUSIONS: While the solicitation of individual informed consent in host settings of gene drive field trials may not be possible or feasible in some instances, local community and stakeholder engagement will be key to building trust towards the proposed conduct of such research. In this regard, the approaches taken by investigators and sponsors of political science field research and weather modification field research should be avoided. Rather, proponents of gene drive field research should look to the Eliminate Dengue field trials, cluster randomised trials, and pragmatic clinical trials for guidance regarding how the solicitation of individual informed consent of host communities ought to be managed, and how these communities ought to be engaged. BioMed Central 2019-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6660705/ /pubmed/31351474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0389-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Debate
Singh, Jerome Amir
Informed consent and community engagement in open field research: lessons for gene drive science
title Informed consent and community engagement in open field research: lessons for gene drive science
title_full Informed consent and community engagement in open field research: lessons for gene drive science
title_fullStr Informed consent and community engagement in open field research: lessons for gene drive science
title_full_unstemmed Informed consent and community engagement in open field research: lessons for gene drive science
title_short Informed consent and community engagement in open field research: lessons for gene drive science
title_sort informed consent and community engagement in open field research: lessons for gene drive science
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6660705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31351474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0389-3
work_keys_str_mv AT singhjeromeamir informedconsentandcommunityengagementinopenfieldresearchlessonsforgenedrivescience