Cargando…

Financial conflicts of interest of clinicians making submissions to the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review: a descriptive study

OBJECTIVES: This study examines financial conflict of interest (FCOI) of clinicians who made submissions to the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review (pCODR), the arm of the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health that recommends whether oncology drug indications should be publicly funded. Fi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Lexchin, Joel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6661552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31350254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030750
_version_ 1783439470503133184
author Lexchin, Joel
author_facet Lexchin, Joel
author_sort Lexchin, Joel
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study examines financial conflict of interest (FCOI) of clinicians who made submissions to the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review (pCODR), the arm of the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health that recommends whether oncology drug indications should be publicly funded. Final reports from pCODR published between October 2016 and February 2019 were examined. DESIGN: Descriptive study. DATA SOURCES: Website of pCODR. INTERVENTIONS: None. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The primary outcome is the number of submissions declaring FCOI. Secondary outcomes are the number of times where clinicians agreed and disagreed with preliminary recommendation from pCODR and the association between the distribution of individual clinicians’ FCOI and pCODR’s funding recommendations. RESULTS: There were 46 drug indication reports from pCODR. Clinicians made 261 submissions. Clinicians declared they received payments from companies 323 times and named 38 different companies making those payments a total of 500 times. Financial conflicts with drug companies were declared in 176 (66.3%) of all submissions. In 21 (45.7%) of the 46 drug indications, 50% or more of the clinicians had a conflict with the company making the drug. Clinicians commented on 37 preliminary recommendations. In all 25 where pCODR recommended funding or conditional funding, the clinicians either agreed or agreed in part. pCODR recommended that the drug indication not be funded 12 times and 9 times clinicians disagreed with that recommendation. The distribution of clinician responses was statistically significantly different depending on whether pCODR recommended funding/conditional funding or do not fund p<0.0001 (Fisher exact test). The distribution of clinicians’ FCOI differed depending on whether the recommendation was fund/conditional fund or do not fund p=0.027 (Fisher exact test). CONCLUSION: Financial conflicts with pharmaceutical companies are widespread among experts making submissions to the pCODR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6661552
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66615522019-08-07 Financial conflicts of interest of clinicians making submissions to the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review: a descriptive study Lexchin, Joel BMJ Open Health Policy OBJECTIVES: This study examines financial conflict of interest (FCOI) of clinicians who made submissions to the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review (pCODR), the arm of the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health that recommends whether oncology drug indications should be publicly funded. Final reports from pCODR published between October 2016 and February 2019 were examined. DESIGN: Descriptive study. DATA SOURCES: Website of pCODR. INTERVENTIONS: None. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The primary outcome is the number of submissions declaring FCOI. Secondary outcomes are the number of times where clinicians agreed and disagreed with preliminary recommendation from pCODR and the association between the distribution of individual clinicians’ FCOI and pCODR’s funding recommendations. RESULTS: There were 46 drug indication reports from pCODR. Clinicians made 261 submissions. Clinicians declared they received payments from companies 323 times and named 38 different companies making those payments a total of 500 times. Financial conflicts with drug companies were declared in 176 (66.3%) of all submissions. In 21 (45.7%) of the 46 drug indications, 50% or more of the clinicians had a conflict with the company making the drug. Clinicians commented on 37 preliminary recommendations. In all 25 where pCODR recommended funding or conditional funding, the clinicians either agreed or agreed in part. pCODR recommended that the drug indication not be funded 12 times and 9 times clinicians disagreed with that recommendation. The distribution of clinician responses was statistically significantly different depending on whether pCODR recommended funding/conditional funding or do not fund p<0.0001 (Fisher exact test). The distribution of clinicians’ FCOI differed depending on whether the recommendation was fund/conditional fund or do not fund p=0.027 (Fisher exact test). CONCLUSION: Financial conflicts with pharmaceutical companies are widespread among experts making submissions to the pCODR. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6661552/ /pubmed/31350254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030750 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Policy
Lexchin, Joel
Financial conflicts of interest of clinicians making submissions to the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review: a descriptive study
title Financial conflicts of interest of clinicians making submissions to the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review: a descriptive study
title_full Financial conflicts of interest of clinicians making submissions to the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review: a descriptive study
title_fullStr Financial conflicts of interest of clinicians making submissions to the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review: a descriptive study
title_full_unstemmed Financial conflicts of interest of clinicians making submissions to the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review: a descriptive study
title_short Financial conflicts of interest of clinicians making submissions to the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review: a descriptive study
title_sort financial conflicts of interest of clinicians making submissions to the pan-canadian oncology drug review: a descriptive study
topic Health Policy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6661552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31350254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030750
work_keys_str_mv AT lexchinjoel financialconflictsofinterestofcliniciansmakingsubmissionstothepancanadianoncologydrugreviewadescriptivestudy