Cargando…
Financial conflicts of interest of clinicians making submissions to the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review: a descriptive study
OBJECTIVES: This study examines financial conflict of interest (FCOI) of clinicians who made submissions to the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review (pCODR), the arm of the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health that recommends whether oncology drug indications should be publicly funded. Fi...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6661552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31350254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030750 |
_version_ | 1783439470503133184 |
---|---|
author | Lexchin, Joel |
author_facet | Lexchin, Joel |
author_sort | Lexchin, Joel |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This study examines financial conflict of interest (FCOI) of clinicians who made submissions to the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review (pCODR), the arm of the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health that recommends whether oncology drug indications should be publicly funded. Final reports from pCODR published between October 2016 and February 2019 were examined. DESIGN: Descriptive study. DATA SOURCES: Website of pCODR. INTERVENTIONS: None. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The primary outcome is the number of submissions declaring FCOI. Secondary outcomes are the number of times where clinicians agreed and disagreed with preliminary recommendation from pCODR and the association between the distribution of individual clinicians’ FCOI and pCODR’s funding recommendations. RESULTS: There were 46 drug indication reports from pCODR. Clinicians made 261 submissions. Clinicians declared they received payments from companies 323 times and named 38 different companies making those payments a total of 500 times. Financial conflicts with drug companies were declared in 176 (66.3%) of all submissions. In 21 (45.7%) of the 46 drug indications, 50% or more of the clinicians had a conflict with the company making the drug. Clinicians commented on 37 preliminary recommendations. In all 25 where pCODR recommended funding or conditional funding, the clinicians either agreed or agreed in part. pCODR recommended that the drug indication not be funded 12 times and 9 times clinicians disagreed with that recommendation. The distribution of clinician responses was statistically significantly different depending on whether pCODR recommended funding/conditional funding or do not fund p<0.0001 (Fisher exact test). The distribution of clinicians’ FCOI differed depending on whether the recommendation was fund/conditional fund or do not fund p=0.027 (Fisher exact test). CONCLUSION: Financial conflicts with pharmaceutical companies are widespread among experts making submissions to the pCODR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6661552 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66615522019-08-07 Financial conflicts of interest of clinicians making submissions to the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review: a descriptive study Lexchin, Joel BMJ Open Health Policy OBJECTIVES: This study examines financial conflict of interest (FCOI) of clinicians who made submissions to the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review (pCODR), the arm of the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health that recommends whether oncology drug indications should be publicly funded. Final reports from pCODR published between October 2016 and February 2019 were examined. DESIGN: Descriptive study. DATA SOURCES: Website of pCODR. INTERVENTIONS: None. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The primary outcome is the number of submissions declaring FCOI. Secondary outcomes are the number of times where clinicians agreed and disagreed with preliminary recommendation from pCODR and the association between the distribution of individual clinicians’ FCOI and pCODR’s funding recommendations. RESULTS: There were 46 drug indication reports from pCODR. Clinicians made 261 submissions. Clinicians declared they received payments from companies 323 times and named 38 different companies making those payments a total of 500 times. Financial conflicts with drug companies were declared in 176 (66.3%) of all submissions. In 21 (45.7%) of the 46 drug indications, 50% or more of the clinicians had a conflict with the company making the drug. Clinicians commented on 37 preliminary recommendations. In all 25 where pCODR recommended funding or conditional funding, the clinicians either agreed or agreed in part. pCODR recommended that the drug indication not be funded 12 times and 9 times clinicians disagreed with that recommendation. The distribution of clinician responses was statistically significantly different depending on whether pCODR recommended funding/conditional funding or do not fund p<0.0001 (Fisher exact test). The distribution of clinicians’ FCOI differed depending on whether the recommendation was fund/conditional fund or do not fund p=0.027 (Fisher exact test). CONCLUSION: Financial conflicts with pharmaceutical companies are widespread among experts making submissions to the pCODR. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6661552/ /pubmed/31350254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030750 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Health Policy Lexchin, Joel Financial conflicts of interest of clinicians making submissions to the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review: a descriptive study |
title | Financial conflicts of interest of clinicians making submissions to the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review: a descriptive study |
title_full | Financial conflicts of interest of clinicians making submissions to the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review: a descriptive study |
title_fullStr | Financial conflicts of interest of clinicians making submissions to the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review: a descriptive study |
title_full_unstemmed | Financial conflicts of interest of clinicians making submissions to the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review: a descriptive study |
title_short | Financial conflicts of interest of clinicians making submissions to the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review: a descriptive study |
title_sort | financial conflicts of interest of clinicians making submissions to the pan-canadian oncology drug review: a descriptive study |
topic | Health Policy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6661552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31350254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030750 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lexchinjoel financialconflictsofinterestofcliniciansmakingsubmissionstothepancanadianoncologydrugreviewadescriptivestudy |