Cargando…

Differences in access to Emergency Paediatric Intensive Care and care during Transport (DEPICT): study protocol for a mixed methods study

INTRODUCTION: Following centralisation of UK paediatric intensive care, specialist retrieval teams were established who travel to general hospitals to stabilise and transport sick children to regional paediatric intensive care units (PICUs). There is national variation among these PICU retrieval tea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramnarayan, Padmanabhan, Evans, Ruth, Draper, Elizabeth S, Seaton, Sarah E, Wray, Jo, Morris, Stephen, Pagel, Christina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6661595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31315865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028000
_version_ 1783439480707874816
author Ramnarayan, Padmanabhan
Evans, Ruth
Draper, Elizabeth S
Seaton, Sarah E
Wray, Jo
Morris, Stephen
Pagel, Christina
author_facet Ramnarayan, Padmanabhan
Evans, Ruth
Draper, Elizabeth S
Seaton, Sarah E
Wray, Jo
Morris, Stephen
Pagel, Christina
author_sort Ramnarayan, Padmanabhan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Following centralisation of UK paediatric intensive care, specialist retrieval teams were established who travel to general hospitals to stabilise and transport sick children to regional paediatric intensive care units (PICUs). There is national variation among these PICU retrieval teams (PICRTs) in terms of how quickly they reach the patient’s bedside and in the care provided during transport. The impact of these variations on clinical outcomes and the experience of stakeholders (patients, families and healthcare staff) is however unknown. The primary objective of this study is to address this evidence gap. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This mixed-methods project involves the following: (1) retrospective analysis of linked data from routine clinical audits (2014–2016) to assess the impact of service variations on 30-day mortality and other secondary clinical outcomes; (2) a prospective questionnaire study conducted at 24 PICUs and 9 associated PICRTs in England and Wales over a 12-month period in 2018 to collect experience data from parents of transported children as well as qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews with a purposive sample of patients, parents and staff to assess the impact of service variations on patient/family experience; (3) health economic evaluation analysing transport service costs (and other associated costs) against lives saved and longer term measurements of quality of life at 12 months in transported children and (4) mathematical modelling evaluating the costs and potential impact of different service configurations. A final work stream involves a series of stakeholder workshops to synthesise study findings and generate recommendations. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been reviewed and approved by the Health Research Authority, ref: 2 18 569. Study results will be actively disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations, social media, print and broadcast media, the internet and stakeholder workshops.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6661595
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66615952019-08-07 Differences in access to Emergency Paediatric Intensive Care and care during Transport (DEPICT): study protocol for a mixed methods study Ramnarayan, Padmanabhan Evans, Ruth Draper, Elizabeth S Seaton, Sarah E Wray, Jo Morris, Stephen Pagel, Christina BMJ Open Paediatrics INTRODUCTION: Following centralisation of UK paediatric intensive care, specialist retrieval teams were established who travel to general hospitals to stabilise and transport sick children to regional paediatric intensive care units (PICUs). There is national variation among these PICU retrieval teams (PICRTs) in terms of how quickly they reach the patient’s bedside and in the care provided during transport. The impact of these variations on clinical outcomes and the experience of stakeholders (patients, families and healthcare staff) is however unknown. The primary objective of this study is to address this evidence gap. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This mixed-methods project involves the following: (1) retrospective analysis of linked data from routine clinical audits (2014–2016) to assess the impact of service variations on 30-day mortality and other secondary clinical outcomes; (2) a prospective questionnaire study conducted at 24 PICUs and 9 associated PICRTs in England and Wales over a 12-month period in 2018 to collect experience data from parents of transported children as well as qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews with a purposive sample of patients, parents and staff to assess the impact of service variations on patient/family experience; (3) health economic evaluation analysing transport service costs (and other associated costs) against lives saved and longer term measurements of quality of life at 12 months in transported children and (4) mathematical modelling evaluating the costs and potential impact of different service configurations. A final work stream involves a series of stakeholder workshops to synthesise study findings and generate recommendations. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been reviewed and approved by the Health Research Authority, ref: 2 18 569. Study results will be actively disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations, social media, print and broadcast media, the internet and stakeholder workshops. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6661595/ /pubmed/31315865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028000 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Paediatrics
Ramnarayan, Padmanabhan
Evans, Ruth
Draper, Elizabeth S
Seaton, Sarah E
Wray, Jo
Morris, Stephen
Pagel, Christina
Differences in access to Emergency Paediatric Intensive Care and care during Transport (DEPICT): study protocol for a mixed methods study
title Differences in access to Emergency Paediatric Intensive Care and care during Transport (DEPICT): study protocol for a mixed methods study
title_full Differences in access to Emergency Paediatric Intensive Care and care during Transport (DEPICT): study protocol for a mixed methods study
title_fullStr Differences in access to Emergency Paediatric Intensive Care and care during Transport (DEPICT): study protocol for a mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Differences in access to Emergency Paediatric Intensive Care and care during Transport (DEPICT): study protocol for a mixed methods study
title_short Differences in access to Emergency Paediatric Intensive Care and care during Transport (DEPICT): study protocol for a mixed methods study
title_sort differences in access to emergency paediatric intensive care and care during transport (depict): study protocol for a mixed methods study
topic Paediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6661595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31315865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028000
work_keys_str_mv AT ramnarayanpadmanabhan differencesinaccesstoemergencypaediatricintensivecareandcareduringtransportdepictstudyprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT evansruth differencesinaccesstoemergencypaediatricintensivecareandcareduringtransportdepictstudyprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT draperelizabeths differencesinaccesstoemergencypaediatricintensivecareandcareduringtransportdepictstudyprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT seatonsarahe differencesinaccesstoemergencypaediatricintensivecareandcareduringtransportdepictstudyprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT wrayjo differencesinaccesstoemergencypaediatricintensivecareandcareduringtransportdepictstudyprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT morrisstephen differencesinaccesstoemergencypaediatricintensivecareandcareduringtransportdepictstudyprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT pagelchristina differencesinaccesstoemergencypaediatricintensivecareandcareduringtransportdepictstudyprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy