Cargando…

A multicentre randomised feasibility STUdy evaluating the impact of a prognostic model for Management of BLunt chest wall trauma patients: STUMBL Trial

OBJECTIVE: A new prognostic model has been developed and externally validated, the aim of which is to assist in the management of the blunt chest wall trauma patient in the emergency department (ED). The aim of this trial is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a definitive impact trial in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Battle, Ceri, Hutchings, Hayley A, Driscoll, Timothy, O’Neill, Claire, Groves, Sam, Watkins, Alan, Lecky, Fiona Elizabeth, Jones, Sally, Gagg, James, Body, Richard, Abbott, Zoe, Evans, Phillip A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6661629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31350248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029187
_version_ 1783439488757792768
author Battle, Ceri
Hutchings, Hayley A
Driscoll, Timothy
O’Neill, Claire
Groves, Sam
Watkins, Alan
Lecky, Fiona Elizabeth
Jones, Sally
Gagg, James
Body, Richard
Abbott, Zoe
Evans, Phillip A
author_facet Battle, Ceri
Hutchings, Hayley A
Driscoll, Timothy
O’Neill, Claire
Groves, Sam
Watkins, Alan
Lecky, Fiona Elizabeth
Jones, Sally
Gagg, James
Body, Richard
Abbott, Zoe
Evans, Phillip A
author_sort Battle, Ceri
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: A new prognostic model has been developed and externally validated, the aim of which is to assist in the management of the blunt chest wall trauma patient in the emergency department (ED). The aim of this trial is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a definitive impact trial investigating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a new prognostic model for the management of patients with blunt chest wall trauma in the ED. DESIGN: Stepped wedge feasibility trial. SETTING: Four EDs in England and Wales. PARTICIPANTS: Adult blunt chest wall trauma patients presenting to the ED with no concurrent, life-threatening injuries. INTERVENTION: A prognostic model (the STUMBL score) to guide clinical decision-making. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: participant recruitment rate and clinicians’ use of the STUMBL score. Secondary: composite outcome measure (mortality, pulmonary complications, delayed upgrade in care, unplanned representations to the ED), physical and mental components of quality of life, clinician feedback and health economic data gathering methodology for healthcare resource utilisation. RESULTS: Quantitative data were analysed using the intention-to-treat principle. 176 patients were recruited; recruitment targets were achieved at all sites. Clinicians used the model in 96% of intervention cases. All feasibility criteria were fully or partially met. After adjusting for predefined covariates, there were no statistically significant differences between the control and intervention periods. Qualitative analysis highlighted that STUMBL was well-received and clinicians would support a definitive trial. Collecting data on intervention costs, health-related quality of life and healthcare resource use was feasible. DISCUSSION: We have demonstrated that a fully powered randomised clinical trial of the STUMBL score is feasible and desirable to clinicians. Minor methodological modifications will be made for the full trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN95571506; Post-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6661629
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66616292019-08-07 A multicentre randomised feasibility STUdy evaluating the impact of a prognostic model for Management of BLunt chest wall trauma patients: STUMBL Trial Battle, Ceri Hutchings, Hayley A Driscoll, Timothy O’Neill, Claire Groves, Sam Watkins, Alan Lecky, Fiona Elizabeth Jones, Sally Gagg, James Body, Richard Abbott, Zoe Evans, Phillip A BMJ Open Emergency Medicine OBJECTIVE: A new prognostic model has been developed and externally validated, the aim of which is to assist in the management of the blunt chest wall trauma patient in the emergency department (ED). The aim of this trial is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a definitive impact trial investigating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a new prognostic model for the management of patients with blunt chest wall trauma in the ED. DESIGN: Stepped wedge feasibility trial. SETTING: Four EDs in England and Wales. PARTICIPANTS: Adult blunt chest wall trauma patients presenting to the ED with no concurrent, life-threatening injuries. INTERVENTION: A prognostic model (the STUMBL score) to guide clinical decision-making. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: participant recruitment rate and clinicians’ use of the STUMBL score. Secondary: composite outcome measure (mortality, pulmonary complications, delayed upgrade in care, unplanned representations to the ED), physical and mental components of quality of life, clinician feedback and health economic data gathering methodology for healthcare resource utilisation. RESULTS: Quantitative data were analysed using the intention-to-treat principle. 176 patients were recruited; recruitment targets were achieved at all sites. Clinicians used the model in 96% of intervention cases. All feasibility criteria were fully or partially met. After adjusting for predefined covariates, there were no statistically significant differences between the control and intervention periods. Qualitative analysis highlighted that STUMBL was well-received and clinicians would support a definitive trial. Collecting data on intervention costs, health-related quality of life and healthcare resource use was feasible. DISCUSSION: We have demonstrated that a fully powered randomised clinical trial of the STUMBL score is feasible and desirable to clinicians. Minor methodological modifications will be made for the full trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN95571506; Post-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6661629/ /pubmed/31350248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029187 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Battle, Ceri
Hutchings, Hayley A
Driscoll, Timothy
O’Neill, Claire
Groves, Sam
Watkins, Alan
Lecky, Fiona Elizabeth
Jones, Sally
Gagg, James
Body, Richard
Abbott, Zoe
Evans, Phillip A
A multicentre randomised feasibility STUdy evaluating the impact of a prognostic model for Management of BLunt chest wall trauma patients: STUMBL Trial
title A multicentre randomised feasibility STUdy evaluating the impact of a prognostic model for Management of BLunt chest wall trauma patients: STUMBL Trial
title_full A multicentre randomised feasibility STUdy evaluating the impact of a prognostic model for Management of BLunt chest wall trauma patients: STUMBL Trial
title_fullStr A multicentre randomised feasibility STUdy evaluating the impact of a prognostic model for Management of BLunt chest wall trauma patients: STUMBL Trial
title_full_unstemmed A multicentre randomised feasibility STUdy evaluating the impact of a prognostic model for Management of BLunt chest wall trauma patients: STUMBL Trial
title_short A multicentre randomised feasibility STUdy evaluating the impact of a prognostic model for Management of BLunt chest wall trauma patients: STUMBL Trial
title_sort multicentre randomised feasibility study evaluating the impact of a prognostic model for management of blunt chest wall trauma patients: stumbl trial
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6661629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31350248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029187
work_keys_str_mv AT battleceri amulticentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial
AT hutchingshayleya amulticentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial
AT driscolltimothy amulticentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial
AT oneillclaire amulticentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial
AT grovessam amulticentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial
AT watkinsalan amulticentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial
AT leckyfionaelizabeth amulticentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial
AT jonessally amulticentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial
AT gaggjames amulticentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial
AT bodyrichard amulticentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial
AT abbottzoe amulticentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial
AT evansphillipa amulticentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial
AT battleceri multicentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial
AT hutchingshayleya multicentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial
AT driscolltimothy multicentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial
AT oneillclaire multicentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial
AT grovessam multicentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial
AT watkinsalan multicentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial
AT leckyfionaelizabeth multicentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial
AT jonessally multicentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial
AT gaggjames multicentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial
AT bodyrichard multicentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial
AT abbottzoe multicentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial
AT evansphillipa multicentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial