Cargando…
A multicentre randomised feasibility STUdy evaluating the impact of a prognostic model for Management of BLunt chest wall trauma patients: STUMBL Trial
OBJECTIVE: A new prognostic model has been developed and externally validated, the aim of which is to assist in the management of the blunt chest wall trauma patient in the emergency department (ED). The aim of this trial is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a definitive impact trial in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6661629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31350248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029187 |
_version_ | 1783439488757792768 |
---|---|
author | Battle, Ceri Hutchings, Hayley A Driscoll, Timothy O’Neill, Claire Groves, Sam Watkins, Alan Lecky, Fiona Elizabeth Jones, Sally Gagg, James Body, Richard Abbott, Zoe Evans, Phillip A |
author_facet | Battle, Ceri Hutchings, Hayley A Driscoll, Timothy O’Neill, Claire Groves, Sam Watkins, Alan Lecky, Fiona Elizabeth Jones, Sally Gagg, James Body, Richard Abbott, Zoe Evans, Phillip A |
author_sort | Battle, Ceri |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: A new prognostic model has been developed and externally validated, the aim of which is to assist in the management of the blunt chest wall trauma patient in the emergency department (ED). The aim of this trial is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a definitive impact trial investigating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a new prognostic model for the management of patients with blunt chest wall trauma in the ED. DESIGN: Stepped wedge feasibility trial. SETTING: Four EDs in England and Wales. PARTICIPANTS: Adult blunt chest wall trauma patients presenting to the ED with no concurrent, life-threatening injuries. INTERVENTION: A prognostic model (the STUMBL score) to guide clinical decision-making. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: participant recruitment rate and clinicians’ use of the STUMBL score. Secondary: composite outcome measure (mortality, pulmonary complications, delayed upgrade in care, unplanned representations to the ED), physical and mental components of quality of life, clinician feedback and health economic data gathering methodology for healthcare resource utilisation. RESULTS: Quantitative data were analysed using the intention-to-treat principle. 176 patients were recruited; recruitment targets were achieved at all sites. Clinicians used the model in 96% of intervention cases. All feasibility criteria were fully or partially met. After adjusting for predefined covariates, there were no statistically significant differences between the control and intervention periods. Qualitative analysis highlighted that STUMBL was well-received and clinicians would support a definitive trial. Collecting data on intervention costs, health-related quality of life and healthcare resource use was feasible. DISCUSSION: We have demonstrated that a fully powered randomised clinical trial of the STUMBL score is feasible and desirable to clinicians. Minor methodological modifications will be made for the full trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN95571506; Post-results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6661629 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66616292019-08-07 A multicentre randomised feasibility STUdy evaluating the impact of a prognostic model for Management of BLunt chest wall trauma patients: STUMBL Trial Battle, Ceri Hutchings, Hayley A Driscoll, Timothy O’Neill, Claire Groves, Sam Watkins, Alan Lecky, Fiona Elizabeth Jones, Sally Gagg, James Body, Richard Abbott, Zoe Evans, Phillip A BMJ Open Emergency Medicine OBJECTIVE: A new prognostic model has been developed and externally validated, the aim of which is to assist in the management of the blunt chest wall trauma patient in the emergency department (ED). The aim of this trial is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a definitive impact trial investigating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a new prognostic model for the management of patients with blunt chest wall trauma in the ED. DESIGN: Stepped wedge feasibility trial. SETTING: Four EDs in England and Wales. PARTICIPANTS: Adult blunt chest wall trauma patients presenting to the ED with no concurrent, life-threatening injuries. INTERVENTION: A prognostic model (the STUMBL score) to guide clinical decision-making. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: participant recruitment rate and clinicians’ use of the STUMBL score. Secondary: composite outcome measure (mortality, pulmonary complications, delayed upgrade in care, unplanned representations to the ED), physical and mental components of quality of life, clinician feedback and health economic data gathering methodology for healthcare resource utilisation. RESULTS: Quantitative data were analysed using the intention-to-treat principle. 176 patients were recruited; recruitment targets were achieved at all sites. Clinicians used the model in 96% of intervention cases. All feasibility criteria were fully or partially met. After adjusting for predefined covariates, there were no statistically significant differences between the control and intervention periods. Qualitative analysis highlighted that STUMBL was well-received and clinicians would support a definitive trial. Collecting data on intervention costs, health-related quality of life and healthcare resource use was feasible. DISCUSSION: We have demonstrated that a fully powered randomised clinical trial of the STUMBL score is feasible and desirable to clinicians. Minor methodological modifications will be made for the full trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN95571506; Post-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6661629/ /pubmed/31350248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029187 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Emergency Medicine Battle, Ceri Hutchings, Hayley A Driscoll, Timothy O’Neill, Claire Groves, Sam Watkins, Alan Lecky, Fiona Elizabeth Jones, Sally Gagg, James Body, Richard Abbott, Zoe Evans, Phillip A A multicentre randomised feasibility STUdy evaluating the impact of a prognostic model for Management of BLunt chest wall trauma patients: STUMBL Trial |
title | A multicentre randomised feasibility STUdy evaluating the impact of a prognostic model for Management of BLunt chest wall trauma patients: STUMBL Trial |
title_full | A multicentre randomised feasibility STUdy evaluating the impact of a prognostic model for Management of BLunt chest wall trauma patients: STUMBL Trial |
title_fullStr | A multicentre randomised feasibility STUdy evaluating the impact of a prognostic model for Management of BLunt chest wall trauma patients: STUMBL Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | A multicentre randomised feasibility STUdy evaluating the impact of a prognostic model for Management of BLunt chest wall trauma patients: STUMBL Trial |
title_short | A multicentre randomised feasibility STUdy evaluating the impact of a prognostic model for Management of BLunt chest wall trauma patients: STUMBL Trial |
title_sort | multicentre randomised feasibility study evaluating the impact of a prognostic model for management of blunt chest wall trauma patients: stumbl trial |
topic | Emergency Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6661629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31350248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029187 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT battleceri amulticentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial AT hutchingshayleya amulticentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial AT driscolltimothy amulticentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial AT oneillclaire amulticentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial AT grovessam amulticentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial AT watkinsalan amulticentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial AT leckyfionaelizabeth amulticentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial AT jonessally amulticentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial AT gaggjames amulticentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial AT bodyrichard amulticentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial AT abbottzoe amulticentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial AT evansphillipa amulticentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial AT battleceri multicentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial AT hutchingshayleya multicentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial AT driscolltimothy multicentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial AT oneillclaire multicentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial AT grovessam multicentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial AT watkinsalan multicentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial AT leckyfionaelizabeth multicentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial AT jonessally multicentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial AT gaggjames multicentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial AT bodyrichard multicentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial AT abbottzoe multicentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial AT evansphillipa multicentrerandomisedfeasibilitystudyevaluatingtheimpactofaprognosticmodelformanagementofbluntchestwalltraumapatientsstumbltrial |