Cargando…

Clinical benefit of two-times-per-day aclidinium bromide compared with once-a-day tiotropium bromide hydrate in COPD: a multicentre, open-label, randomised study

OBJECTIVE: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is mainly treated pharmaceutically with bronchodilators. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefits of two-times-per-day aclidinium bromide (Acli-BID) compared with once-a-day tiotropium bromide hydrate (Tio-QD) in patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kamei, Tadashi, Nakamura, Hiroyuki, Nanki, Nobuki, Minakata, Yoshiaki, Matsunaga, Kazuto, Mori, Yoshihiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6661652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31350236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024114
_version_ 1783439494285885440
author Kamei, Tadashi
Nakamura, Hiroyuki
Nanki, Nobuki
Minakata, Yoshiaki
Matsunaga, Kazuto
Mori, Yoshihiro
author_facet Kamei, Tadashi
Nakamura, Hiroyuki
Nanki, Nobuki
Minakata, Yoshiaki
Matsunaga, Kazuto
Mori, Yoshihiro
author_sort Kamei, Tadashi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is mainly treated pharmaceutically with bronchodilators. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefits of two-times-per-day aclidinium bromide (Acli-BID) compared with once-a-day tiotropium bromide hydrate (Tio-QD) in patients with COPD. DESIGN: This study was a multicentre, open-label, randomised study. SETTING: Fourcentres in Kagawa prefecture, Japan. PARTICIPANT: Patients who were diagnosed to have COPD Grade 2–3 according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2015 criteria were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive Acli-BID or Tio-QD at a 1:1 ratio, and followed for 8 weeks. Acli-BID was administered in the morning and night, and Tio-QD was administered in the night. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was forced expiratory volume in one second area under the curve (FEV(1)AUC(0-3)), and secondary outcomes were pulmonary function, physical activity, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), modified Medical Research Council (mMRC), the 8-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-8) and COPD exacerbations. Adverse events were evaluated during the study. RESULTS: 44 patients were included in this study. FEV(1)AUC(0-3) at week 8 was 4.62±1.43 L·hour in Acli-BID and 4.73±1.60 L·hour in Tio-QD (mean difference (MD) −0.11 L·hour; 95% CI), −1.04 to 0.83). Significant improvement was observed in activity-related subscales of SGRQ (MD −7.78; 95% CI −14.61 to −0.94) and SF-8 (MD 4.01; 95% CI 0.37 to 7.65), mMRC (MD −0.66; 95% CI −1.19 to −0.13) and rate ratio (0.52, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.99) of exacerbations in the Acli-BID compared with the Tio-QD. Acli-BID and Tio-QD significantly improved sedentary behaviour (MD −35.20 min; 95% CI −67.41 to −2.94 and MD −55.40 min; 95% CI −98.15 to −12.77) within each group, but there was no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Acli-BID as with Tio-QD could be one of the therapeutic options for patients with COPD to improve pulmonary function. Also, our results suggest that intervention with bronchodilators enhanced physical activity in patients with COPD. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN 000020020.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6661652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66616522019-08-07 Clinical benefit of two-times-per-day aclidinium bromide compared with once-a-day tiotropium bromide hydrate in COPD: a multicentre, open-label, randomised study Kamei, Tadashi Nakamura, Hiroyuki Nanki, Nobuki Minakata, Yoshiaki Matsunaga, Kazuto Mori, Yoshihiro BMJ Open Respiratory Medicine OBJECTIVE: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is mainly treated pharmaceutically with bronchodilators. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefits of two-times-per-day aclidinium bromide (Acli-BID) compared with once-a-day tiotropium bromide hydrate (Tio-QD) in patients with COPD. DESIGN: This study was a multicentre, open-label, randomised study. SETTING: Fourcentres in Kagawa prefecture, Japan. PARTICIPANT: Patients who were diagnosed to have COPD Grade 2–3 according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2015 criteria were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive Acli-BID or Tio-QD at a 1:1 ratio, and followed for 8 weeks. Acli-BID was administered in the morning and night, and Tio-QD was administered in the night. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was forced expiratory volume in one second area under the curve (FEV(1)AUC(0-3)), and secondary outcomes were pulmonary function, physical activity, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), modified Medical Research Council (mMRC), the 8-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-8) and COPD exacerbations. Adverse events were evaluated during the study. RESULTS: 44 patients were included in this study. FEV(1)AUC(0-3) at week 8 was 4.62±1.43 L·hour in Acli-BID and 4.73±1.60 L·hour in Tio-QD (mean difference (MD) −0.11 L·hour; 95% CI), −1.04 to 0.83). Significant improvement was observed in activity-related subscales of SGRQ (MD −7.78; 95% CI −14.61 to −0.94) and SF-8 (MD 4.01; 95% CI 0.37 to 7.65), mMRC (MD −0.66; 95% CI −1.19 to −0.13) and rate ratio (0.52, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.99) of exacerbations in the Acli-BID compared with the Tio-QD. Acli-BID and Tio-QD significantly improved sedentary behaviour (MD −35.20 min; 95% CI −67.41 to −2.94 and MD −55.40 min; 95% CI −98.15 to −12.77) within each group, but there was no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Acli-BID as with Tio-QD could be one of the therapeutic options for patients with COPD to improve pulmonary function. Also, our results suggest that intervention with bronchodilators enhanced physical activity in patients with COPD. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN 000020020. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6661652/ /pubmed/31350236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024114 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Respiratory Medicine
Kamei, Tadashi
Nakamura, Hiroyuki
Nanki, Nobuki
Minakata, Yoshiaki
Matsunaga, Kazuto
Mori, Yoshihiro
Clinical benefit of two-times-per-day aclidinium bromide compared with once-a-day tiotropium bromide hydrate in COPD: a multicentre, open-label, randomised study
title Clinical benefit of two-times-per-day aclidinium bromide compared with once-a-day tiotropium bromide hydrate in COPD: a multicentre, open-label, randomised study
title_full Clinical benefit of two-times-per-day aclidinium bromide compared with once-a-day tiotropium bromide hydrate in COPD: a multicentre, open-label, randomised study
title_fullStr Clinical benefit of two-times-per-day aclidinium bromide compared with once-a-day tiotropium bromide hydrate in COPD: a multicentre, open-label, randomised study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical benefit of two-times-per-day aclidinium bromide compared with once-a-day tiotropium bromide hydrate in COPD: a multicentre, open-label, randomised study
title_short Clinical benefit of two-times-per-day aclidinium bromide compared with once-a-day tiotropium bromide hydrate in COPD: a multicentre, open-label, randomised study
title_sort clinical benefit of two-times-per-day aclidinium bromide compared with once-a-day tiotropium bromide hydrate in copd: a multicentre, open-label, randomised study
topic Respiratory Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6661652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31350236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024114
work_keys_str_mv AT kameitadashi clinicalbenefitoftwotimesperdayaclidiniumbromidecomparedwithonceadaytiotropiumbromidehydrateincopdamulticentreopenlabelrandomisedstudy
AT nakamurahiroyuki clinicalbenefitoftwotimesperdayaclidiniumbromidecomparedwithonceadaytiotropiumbromidehydrateincopdamulticentreopenlabelrandomisedstudy
AT nankinobuki clinicalbenefitoftwotimesperdayaclidiniumbromidecomparedwithonceadaytiotropiumbromidehydrateincopdamulticentreopenlabelrandomisedstudy
AT minakatayoshiaki clinicalbenefitoftwotimesperdayaclidiniumbromidecomparedwithonceadaytiotropiumbromidehydrateincopdamulticentreopenlabelrandomisedstudy
AT matsunagakazuto clinicalbenefitoftwotimesperdayaclidiniumbromidecomparedwithonceadaytiotropiumbromidehydrateincopdamulticentreopenlabelrandomisedstudy
AT moriyoshihiro clinicalbenefitoftwotimesperdayaclidiniumbromidecomparedwithonceadaytiotropiumbromidehydrateincopdamulticentreopenlabelrandomisedstudy