Cargando…
Measurement of unnecessary psychiatric readmissions: a scoping review protocol
INTRODUCTION: Care transition for patients being discharged from inpatient mental healthcare to outpatient settings is a growing focus for healthcare delivery systems. Many studies of this inpatient to outpatient transition use the rate of postdischarge readmissions as a patient-level outcome measur...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6661670/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31340974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030696 |
_version_ | 1783439498527375360 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Bo Weatherly, Christopher Wolk, Courtney Benjamin Proctor, Enola K |
author_facet | Kim, Bo Weatherly, Christopher Wolk, Courtney Benjamin Proctor, Enola K |
author_sort | Kim, Bo |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Care transition for patients being discharged from inpatient mental healthcare to outpatient settings is a growing focus for healthcare delivery systems. Many studies of this inpatient to outpatient transition use the rate of postdischarge readmissions as a patient-level outcome measure to assess the quality of transition. However, it is unclear how studies define the measure, and whether there is a shared understanding by the field regarding which definition is appropriate for which circumstances. This scoping review thus aims to examine how published studies have approached measuring unnecessary psychiatric readmissions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The scoping review will be structured according to Levac et al’s enhancement to Arksey and O’Malley’s framework for conducting scoping reviews. The protocol is registered through the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/5nxuc/). We will search literature databases for studies that (1) are about care transition processes associated with unnecessary psychiatric readmissions and (2) specify use of at least one readmission time interval (ie, time period since previous discharge from inpatient care, within which a hospitalisation can be considered a readmission). Screening and review of articles will be carried out by two reviewers, first independently then involving a third reviewer as needed for consensus. We will assess review findings through both tabular and thematic analyses, noting prevalent trends in study characteristics and emergent themes across our reviewed studies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This work comes at a time of heightened interest by many mental healthcare systems in high-quality practices that structure their care processes towards effective inpatient to outpatient transitions. Findings will support the systems’ careful examination of alternative potential transitional interventions, helping to ensure that their often limited quality enhancement resources are put to optimal use. We will focus on disseminating our findings to the healthcare community through strong communication infrastructures and connections with health system stakeholders that our multidisciplinary study consultants will foster throughout this study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6661670 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66616702019-08-07 Measurement of unnecessary psychiatric readmissions: a scoping review protocol Kim, Bo Weatherly, Christopher Wolk, Courtney Benjamin Proctor, Enola K BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: Care transition for patients being discharged from inpatient mental healthcare to outpatient settings is a growing focus for healthcare delivery systems. Many studies of this inpatient to outpatient transition use the rate of postdischarge readmissions as a patient-level outcome measure to assess the quality of transition. However, it is unclear how studies define the measure, and whether there is a shared understanding by the field regarding which definition is appropriate for which circumstances. This scoping review thus aims to examine how published studies have approached measuring unnecessary psychiatric readmissions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The scoping review will be structured according to Levac et al’s enhancement to Arksey and O’Malley’s framework for conducting scoping reviews. The protocol is registered through the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/5nxuc/). We will search literature databases for studies that (1) are about care transition processes associated with unnecessary psychiatric readmissions and (2) specify use of at least one readmission time interval (ie, time period since previous discharge from inpatient care, within which a hospitalisation can be considered a readmission). Screening and review of articles will be carried out by two reviewers, first independently then involving a third reviewer as needed for consensus. We will assess review findings through both tabular and thematic analyses, noting prevalent trends in study characteristics and emergent themes across our reviewed studies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This work comes at a time of heightened interest by many mental healthcare systems in high-quality practices that structure their care processes towards effective inpatient to outpatient transitions. Findings will support the systems’ careful examination of alternative potential transitional interventions, helping to ensure that their often limited quality enhancement resources are put to optimal use. We will focus on disseminating our findings to the healthcare community through strong communication infrastructures and connections with health system stakeholders that our multidisciplinary study consultants will foster throughout this study. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6661670/ /pubmed/31340974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030696 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Mental Health Kim, Bo Weatherly, Christopher Wolk, Courtney Benjamin Proctor, Enola K Measurement of unnecessary psychiatric readmissions: a scoping review protocol |
title | Measurement of unnecessary psychiatric readmissions: a scoping review protocol |
title_full | Measurement of unnecessary psychiatric readmissions: a scoping review protocol |
title_fullStr | Measurement of unnecessary psychiatric readmissions: a scoping review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Measurement of unnecessary psychiatric readmissions: a scoping review protocol |
title_short | Measurement of unnecessary psychiatric readmissions: a scoping review protocol |
title_sort | measurement of unnecessary psychiatric readmissions: a scoping review protocol |
topic | Mental Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6661670/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31340974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030696 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimbo measurementofunnecessarypsychiatricreadmissionsascopingreviewprotocol AT weatherlychristopher measurementofunnecessarypsychiatricreadmissionsascopingreviewprotocol AT wolkcourtneybenjamin measurementofunnecessarypsychiatricreadmissionsascopingreviewprotocol AT proctorenolak measurementofunnecessarypsychiatricreadmissionsascopingreviewprotocol |