Cargando…

Psychometric properties of the Depression Stigma Scale (DSS) in Chinese cancer patients: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES: The Depression Stigma Scale (DSS) is commonly used to assess depression stigma in the general population and in people with depression. The DSS includes two 9-item subscales assumed to measure personal depression stigma (ie, personal perceptions of depression) and perceived depression st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Lei, Yao, Juntao, Wu, Liyang, Wang, Jun, Qiu, Mengting, Zhang, Chunyu, Zhang, Hongmei, Xie, Juan, Liu, Ailan, Ranchor, Adelita, Schroevers, Maya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6661685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31340966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028429
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: The Depression Stigma Scale (DSS) is commonly used to assess depression stigma in the general population and in people with depression. The DSS includes two 9-item subscales assumed to measure personal depression stigma (ie, personal perceptions of depression) and perceived depression stigma (ie, perceptions of how others perceive depression). The aim of the present study was to examine its psychometric properties in terms of validity and reliability in Chinese cancer patients. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study design. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTINGS: This study focused on 301 Chinese cancer patients recruited from two hospitals in Xi’an, China. METHODS: Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to assess the factor structure. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. To examine concurrent validity, symptoms of depression were used as the criterion. RESULTS: For each subscale of the DSS (ie, personal and perceived depression stigma), the EFA and CFA confirmed a two-factor structure: weak-not-sick (ie, perceiving that depression is not a real illness, but rather a sign of weakness) and discrimination (ie, perceiving that depressed people are discriminated against). The Cronbach’s alphas were adequate, ranging from 0.70 to 0.80. Symptoms of depression were positively but weakly correlated to personal and perceived depression stigma. CONCLUSIONS: The DSS appeared to show satisfactory psychometric properties in our sample of cancer patients. Both personal depression stigma and perceived depression stigma subscales consisted of two underlying aspects.