Cargando…

Improving access to primary healthcare for vulnerable populations in Australia and Canada: protocol for a mixed-method evaluation of six complex interventions

INTRODUCTION: Access to primary healthcare (PHC) has a fundamental influence on health outcomes, particularly for members of vulnerable populations. Innovative Models Promoting Access-to-Care Transformation (IMPACT) is a 5-year research programme built on community-academic partnerships. IMPACT aims...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Russell, Grant, Kunin, Marina, Harris, Mark, Levesque, Jean-Frédéric, Descôteaux, Sarah, Scott, Catherine, Lewis, Virginia, Dionne, Émilie, Advocat, Jenny, Dahrouge, Simone, Stocks, Nigel, Spooner, Catherine, Haggerty, Jeannie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6661687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31352414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027869
_version_ 1783439502569635840
author Russell, Grant
Kunin, Marina
Harris, Mark
Levesque, Jean-Frédéric
Descôteaux, Sarah
Scott, Catherine
Lewis, Virginia
Dionne, Émilie
Advocat, Jenny
Dahrouge, Simone
Stocks, Nigel
Spooner, Catherine
Haggerty, Jeannie
author_facet Russell, Grant
Kunin, Marina
Harris, Mark
Levesque, Jean-Frédéric
Descôteaux, Sarah
Scott, Catherine
Lewis, Virginia
Dionne, Émilie
Advocat, Jenny
Dahrouge, Simone
Stocks, Nigel
Spooner, Catherine
Haggerty, Jeannie
author_sort Russell, Grant
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Access to primary healthcare (PHC) has a fundamental influence on health outcomes, particularly for members of vulnerable populations. Innovative Models Promoting Access-to-Care Transformation (IMPACT) is a 5-year research programme built on community-academic partnerships. IMPACT aims to design, implement and evaluate organisational innovations to improve access to appropriate PHC for vulnerable populations. Six Local Innovation Partnerships (LIPs) in three Australian states (New South Wales, Victoria and South Australia) and three Canadian provinces (Ontario, Quebec and Alberta) used a common approach to implement six different interventions. This paper describes the protocol to evaluate the processes, outcomes and scalability of these organisational innovations. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The evaluation will use a convergent mixed-methods design involving longitudinal (pre and post) analysis of the six interventions. Study participants include vulnerable populations, PHC practices, their clinicians and administrative staff, service providers in other health or social service organisations, intervention staff and members of the LIP teams. Data were collected prior to and 3–6 months after the interventions and included interviews with members of the LIPs, organisational process data, document analysis and tools collecting the cost of components of the intervention. Assessment of impacts on individuals and organisations will rely on surveys and semistructured interviews (and, in some settings, direct observation) of participating patients, providers and PHC practices. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The IMPACT research programme received initial ethics approval from St Mary’s Hospital (Montreal) SMHC #13–30. The interventions received a range of other ethics approvals across the six jurisdictions. Dissemination of the findings should generate a deeper understanding of the ways in which system-level organisational innovations can improve access to PHC for vulnerable populations and new knowledge concerning improvements in PHC delivery in health service utilisation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6661687
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66616872019-08-07 Improving access to primary healthcare for vulnerable populations in Australia and Canada: protocol for a mixed-method evaluation of six complex interventions Russell, Grant Kunin, Marina Harris, Mark Levesque, Jean-Frédéric Descôteaux, Sarah Scott, Catherine Lewis, Virginia Dionne, Émilie Advocat, Jenny Dahrouge, Simone Stocks, Nigel Spooner, Catherine Haggerty, Jeannie BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: Access to primary healthcare (PHC) has a fundamental influence on health outcomes, particularly for members of vulnerable populations. Innovative Models Promoting Access-to-Care Transformation (IMPACT) is a 5-year research programme built on community-academic partnerships. IMPACT aims to design, implement and evaluate organisational innovations to improve access to appropriate PHC for vulnerable populations. Six Local Innovation Partnerships (LIPs) in three Australian states (New South Wales, Victoria and South Australia) and three Canadian provinces (Ontario, Quebec and Alberta) used a common approach to implement six different interventions. This paper describes the protocol to evaluate the processes, outcomes and scalability of these organisational innovations. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The evaluation will use a convergent mixed-methods design involving longitudinal (pre and post) analysis of the six interventions. Study participants include vulnerable populations, PHC practices, their clinicians and administrative staff, service providers in other health or social service organisations, intervention staff and members of the LIP teams. Data were collected prior to and 3–6 months after the interventions and included interviews with members of the LIPs, organisational process data, document analysis and tools collecting the cost of components of the intervention. Assessment of impacts on individuals and organisations will rely on surveys and semistructured interviews (and, in some settings, direct observation) of participating patients, providers and PHC practices. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The IMPACT research programme received initial ethics approval from St Mary’s Hospital (Montreal) SMHC #13–30. The interventions received a range of other ethics approvals across the six jurisdictions. Dissemination of the findings should generate a deeper understanding of the ways in which system-level organisational innovations can improve access to PHC for vulnerable populations and new knowledge concerning improvements in PHC delivery in health service utilisation. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6661687/ /pubmed/31352414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027869 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Russell, Grant
Kunin, Marina
Harris, Mark
Levesque, Jean-Frédéric
Descôteaux, Sarah
Scott, Catherine
Lewis, Virginia
Dionne, Émilie
Advocat, Jenny
Dahrouge, Simone
Stocks, Nigel
Spooner, Catherine
Haggerty, Jeannie
Improving access to primary healthcare for vulnerable populations in Australia and Canada: protocol for a mixed-method evaluation of six complex interventions
title Improving access to primary healthcare for vulnerable populations in Australia and Canada: protocol for a mixed-method evaluation of six complex interventions
title_full Improving access to primary healthcare for vulnerable populations in Australia and Canada: protocol for a mixed-method evaluation of six complex interventions
title_fullStr Improving access to primary healthcare for vulnerable populations in Australia and Canada: protocol for a mixed-method evaluation of six complex interventions
title_full_unstemmed Improving access to primary healthcare for vulnerable populations in Australia and Canada: protocol for a mixed-method evaluation of six complex interventions
title_short Improving access to primary healthcare for vulnerable populations in Australia and Canada: protocol for a mixed-method evaluation of six complex interventions
title_sort improving access to primary healthcare for vulnerable populations in australia and canada: protocol for a mixed-method evaluation of six complex interventions
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6661687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31352414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027869
work_keys_str_mv AT russellgrant improvingaccesstoprimaryhealthcareforvulnerablepopulationsinaustraliaandcanadaprotocolforamixedmethodevaluationofsixcomplexinterventions
AT kuninmarina improvingaccesstoprimaryhealthcareforvulnerablepopulationsinaustraliaandcanadaprotocolforamixedmethodevaluationofsixcomplexinterventions
AT harrismark improvingaccesstoprimaryhealthcareforvulnerablepopulationsinaustraliaandcanadaprotocolforamixedmethodevaluationofsixcomplexinterventions
AT levesquejeanfrederic improvingaccesstoprimaryhealthcareforvulnerablepopulationsinaustraliaandcanadaprotocolforamixedmethodevaluationofsixcomplexinterventions
AT descoteauxsarah improvingaccesstoprimaryhealthcareforvulnerablepopulationsinaustraliaandcanadaprotocolforamixedmethodevaluationofsixcomplexinterventions
AT scottcatherine improvingaccesstoprimaryhealthcareforvulnerablepopulationsinaustraliaandcanadaprotocolforamixedmethodevaluationofsixcomplexinterventions
AT lewisvirginia improvingaccesstoprimaryhealthcareforvulnerablepopulationsinaustraliaandcanadaprotocolforamixedmethodevaluationofsixcomplexinterventions
AT dionneemilie improvingaccesstoprimaryhealthcareforvulnerablepopulationsinaustraliaandcanadaprotocolforamixedmethodevaluationofsixcomplexinterventions
AT advocatjenny improvingaccesstoprimaryhealthcareforvulnerablepopulationsinaustraliaandcanadaprotocolforamixedmethodevaluationofsixcomplexinterventions
AT dahrougesimone improvingaccesstoprimaryhealthcareforvulnerablepopulationsinaustraliaandcanadaprotocolforamixedmethodevaluationofsixcomplexinterventions
AT stocksnigel improvingaccesstoprimaryhealthcareforvulnerablepopulationsinaustraliaandcanadaprotocolforamixedmethodevaluationofsixcomplexinterventions
AT spoonercatherine improvingaccesstoprimaryhealthcareforvulnerablepopulationsinaustraliaandcanadaprotocolforamixedmethodevaluationofsixcomplexinterventions
AT haggertyjeannie improvingaccesstoprimaryhealthcareforvulnerablepopulationsinaustraliaandcanadaprotocolforamixedmethodevaluationofsixcomplexinterventions