Cargando…
Diagnosis of feline pancreatitis with SNAP fPL and Spec fPL
OBJECTIVES: Pancreatitis is a frequent disease in cats for which the ante-mortem diagnosis remains challenging. Feline pancreatic lipase immunoreactivity (fPLI) has been reported to have a high sensitivity for the diagnosis of pancreatitis. The aim of this study was to compare the rapid in-house tes...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6661714/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30183482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1098612X18796624 |
_version_ | 1783439509016281088 |
---|---|
author | Schnauß, Fanny Hanisch, Franziska Burgener, Iwan Anton |
author_facet | Schnauß, Fanny Hanisch, Franziska Burgener, Iwan Anton |
author_sort | Schnauß, Fanny |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Pancreatitis is a frequent disease in cats for which the ante-mortem diagnosis remains challenging. Feline pancreatic lipase immunoreactivity (fPLI) has been reported to have a high sensitivity for the diagnosis of pancreatitis. The aim of this study was to compare the rapid in-house test SNAP fPL with the standard test Spec fPL and to evaluate the use of SNAP fPL to diagnose pancreatitis in an emergency setting. METHODS: fPLI of 111 cats with a clinical suspicion of pancreatitis was measured with both SNAP fPL and Spec fPL. Furthermore, clinical signs, haematological and biochemical changes, and abdominal ultrasound findings were recorded. RESULTS: Seventy-eight of 111 cats (70.3%) were tested below the cut-off level for pancreatitis with SNAP, as well as Spec fPL, whereas 21/111 (18.9%) were tested with values above the cut-off level with both tests. In 12/111 (10.8%) cats the results were discordant. The comparison of both tests revealed an agreement of 78/80 (97.5%) when Spec fPL was ⩽3.5 μg/l (negative) and 18/20 (90%) when Spec fPL was ⩾5.4 μg/l (positive). The most common clinical signs in cats with suspected pancreatitis (n = 21) were lethargy (95.2%), reduced appetite and vomiting (90.5% each), dehydration (81.0%), diarrhoea (57.1%), abdominal pain and weight loss (47.6% each). Hyperglycaemia and hyperbilirubinaemia (85.7% each), increased aspartate transaminase (76.2%) and alanine transaminase (47.6%), leucocytosis (61.9%), lymphopenia (57.1%), decreased sodium and chloride (57.1% each), and increased urea (52.4%) were the most common abnormalities in blood work. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Clinical signs, as well as routine blood-work changes, were non-specific and thus proved to be insufficient to diagnose pancreatitis. The combination of SNAP fPL and subsequent Spec fPL, if indicated, provided the opportunity to rule out or to diagnose pancreatitis with a higher certainty than previously known test methods. This study proved SNAP fPL to be a valuable tool to exclude or include pancreatitis in an emergency setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6661714 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66617142019-09-16 Diagnosis of feline pancreatitis with SNAP fPL and Spec fPL Schnauß, Fanny Hanisch, Franziska Burgener, Iwan Anton J Feline Med Surg Original Articles OBJECTIVES: Pancreatitis is a frequent disease in cats for which the ante-mortem diagnosis remains challenging. Feline pancreatic lipase immunoreactivity (fPLI) has been reported to have a high sensitivity for the diagnosis of pancreatitis. The aim of this study was to compare the rapid in-house test SNAP fPL with the standard test Spec fPL and to evaluate the use of SNAP fPL to diagnose pancreatitis in an emergency setting. METHODS: fPLI of 111 cats with a clinical suspicion of pancreatitis was measured with both SNAP fPL and Spec fPL. Furthermore, clinical signs, haematological and biochemical changes, and abdominal ultrasound findings were recorded. RESULTS: Seventy-eight of 111 cats (70.3%) were tested below the cut-off level for pancreatitis with SNAP, as well as Spec fPL, whereas 21/111 (18.9%) were tested with values above the cut-off level with both tests. In 12/111 (10.8%) cats the results were discordant. The comparison of both tests revealed an agreement of 78/80 (97.5%) when Spec fPL was ⩽3.5 μg/l (negative) and 18/20 (90%) when Spec fPL was ⩾5.4 μg/l (positive). The most common clinical signs in cats with suspected pancreatitis (n = 21) were lethargy (95.2%), reduced appetite and vomiting (90.5% each), dehydration (81.0%), diarrhoea (57.1%), abdominal pain and weight loss (47.6% each). Hyperglycaemia and hyperbilirubinaemia (85.7% each), increased aspartate transaminase (76.2%) and alanine transaminase (47.6%), leucocytosis (61.9%), lymphopenia (57.1%), decreased sodium and chloride (57.1% each), and increased urea (52.4%) were the most common abnormalities in blood work. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Clinical signs, as well as routine blood-work changes, were non-specific and thus proved to be insufficient to diagnose pancreatitis. The combination of SNAP fPL and subsequent Spec fPL, if indicated, provided the opportunity to rule out or to diagnose pancreatitis with a higher certainty than previously known test methods. This study proved SNAP fPL to be a valuable tool to exclude or include pancreatitis in an emergency setting. SAGE Publications 2018-09-05 2019-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6661714/ /pubmed/30183482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1098612X18796624 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Schnauß, Fanny Hanisch, Franziska Burgener, Iwan Anton Diagnosis of feline pancreatitis with SNAP fPL and Spec fPL |
title | Diagnosis of feline pancreatitis with SNAP fPL and Spec
fPL |
title_full | Diagnosis of feline pancreatitis with SNAP fPL and Spec
fPL |
title_fullStr | Diagnosis of feline pancreatitis with SNAP fPL and Spec
fPL |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnosis of feline pancreatitis with SNAP fPL and Spec
fPL |
title_short | Diagnosis of feline pancreatitis with SNAP fPL and Spec
fPL |
title_sort | diagnosis of feline pancreatitis with snap fpl and spec
fpl |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6661714/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30183482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1098612X18796624 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schnaußfanny diagnosisoffelinepancreatitiswithsnapfplandspecfpl AT hanischfranziska diagnosisoffelinepancreatitiswithsnapfplandspecfpl AT burgeneriwananton diagnosisoffelinepancreatitiswithsnapfplandspecfpl |