Cargando…

Community and Hospital Factors Associated With Stroke Center Certification in the United States, 2009 to 2017

IMPORTANCE: The increased number of stroke centers in the United States may not be equitably distributed across all populations. Anecdotal reports suggest there may be differential proliferation in wealthier and urban communities. OBJECTIVE: To examine hospital characteristics and economic condition...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shen, Yu-Chu, Chen, Gabriel, Hsia, Renee Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6661722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31348507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.7855
Descripción
Sumario:IMPORTANCE: The increased number of stroke centers in the United States may not be equitably distributed across all populations. Anecdotal reports suggest there may be differential proliferation in wealthier and urban communities. OBJECTIVE: To examine hospital characteristics and economic conditions of communities surrounding hospitals with and without stroke centers. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study included all general, short-term, acute hospitals in the continental United States and used merged data from the Joint Commission, Det Norske Veritas, Healthcare Facilities Accreditation Program, state health departments, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the American Hospital Association, the Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care, and the US Census Bureau from January 1, 2009, to September 30, 2017, to compare hospital and community characteristics of stroke-certified and non–stroke-certified hospitals and assessed characteristics of early and late adopters of stroke certification. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Stroke center certification was the primary outcome. Risk factors were grouped into 3 categories: economic and financial, hospital, and community characteristics. Survival analyses were performed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: The study included 4546 US hospitals. During the study period, 1689 hospitals (37.2%) were stroke certified (961 adopted certification on or before January 1, 2009, 728 afterward). After controlling for other area and hospital characteristics, hospitals in low-income hospital service areas and the lower tertile of profit-margin distribution were less likely to adopt stroke certification (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.52-0.74 and HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.98, respectively). Urban hospitals had a higher likelihood of stroke certification than rural hospitals (HR, 12.79; 95% CI, 10.64-15.37). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study found that stroke centers have proliferated unevenly across geographic localities, where hospitals in high-income hospital service areas and with higher profit margins have a greater likelihood of being stroke certified. These findings suggest that market-driven factors may be associated with stroke center certification.