Cargando…
Expectations and experiences of hospital postnatal care in the UK: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies
OBJECTIVES: To report on women’s and families’ expectations and experiences of hospital postnatal care, and also to reflect on women’s satisfaction with hospital postnatal care and to relate their expectations to their actual care experiences. DESIGN: Systematic review. SETTING: UK. PARTICIPANTS: Po...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6661900/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31320339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022212 |
_version_ | 1783439550178131968 |
---|---|
author | Malouf, Reem Henderson, Jane Alderdice, Fiona |
author_facet | Malouf, Reem Henderson, Jane Alderdice, Fiona |
author_sort | Malouf, Reem |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To report on women’s and families’ expectations and experiences of hospital postnatal care, and also to reflect on women’s satisfaction with hospital postnatal care and to relate their expectations to their actual care experiences. DESIGN: Systematic review. SETTING: UK. PARTICIPANTS: Postnatal women. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Women’s and families’ expectations, experiences and satisfaction with hospital postnatal care. METHODS: Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL Plus), Science Citation Index, and Social Sciences Citation Index were searched to identify relevant studies published since 1970. We incorporated findings from qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies. Eligible studies were independently screened and quality-assessed using a modified version of the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool for quantitative studies and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme for qualitative studies. Data were extracted on participants’ characteristics, study period, setting, study objective and study specified outcomes, in addition to the summary of results. RESULTS: Data were included from 53 studies, of which 28 were quantitative, 19 were qualitative and 6 were mixed-methods studies. The methodological quality of the included studies was mixed, and only three were completely free from bias. Women were generally satisfied with their hospital postnatal care but were critical of staff interaction, the ward environment and infant feeding support. Ethnic minority women were more critical of hospital postnatal care than white women. Although duration of postnatal stay has declined over time, women were generally happy with this aspect of their care. There was limited evidence regarding women’s expectations of postnatal care, families’ experience and social disadvantage. CONCLUSION: Women were generally positive about their experiences of hospital postnatal care, but improvements could still be made. Individualised, flexible models of postnatal care should be evaluated and implemented. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017057913. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6661900 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66619002019-08-07 Expectations and experiences of hospital postnatal care in the UK: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies Malouf, Reem Henderson, Jane Alderdice, Fiona BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVES: To report on women’s and families’ expectations and experiences of hospital postnatal care, and also to reflect on women’s satisfaction with hospital postnatal care and to relate their expectations to their actual care experiences. DESIGN: Systematic review. SETTING: UK. PARTICIPANTS: Postnatal women. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Women’s and families’ expectations, experiences and satisfaction with hospital postnatal care. METHODS: Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL Plus), Science Citation Index, and Social Sciences Citation Index were searched to identify relevant studies published since 1970. We incorporated findings from qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies. Eligible studies were independently screened and quality-assessed using a modified version of the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool for quantitative studies and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme for qualitative studies. Data were extracted on participants’ characteristics, study period, setting, study objective and study specified outcomes, in addition to the summary of results. RESULTS: Data were included from 53 studies, of which 28 were quantitative, 19 were qualitative and 6 were mixed-methods studies. The methodological quality of the included studies was mixed, and only three were completely free from bias. Women were generally satisfied with their hospital postnatal care but were critical of staff interaction, the ward environment and infant feeding support. Ethnic minority women were more critical of hospital postnatal care than white women. Although duration of postnatal stay has declined over time, women were generally happy with this aspect of their care. There was limited evidence regarding women’s expectations of postnatal care, families’ experience and social disadvantage. CONCLUSION: Women were generally positive about their experiences of hospital postnatal care, but improvements could still be made. Individualised, flexible models of postnatal care should be evaluated and implemented. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017057913. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6661900/ /pubmed/31320339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022212 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Obstetrics and Gynaecology Malouf, Reem Henderson, Jane Alderdice, Fiona Expectations and experiences of hospital postnatal care in the UK: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies |
title | Expectations and experiences of hospital postnatal care in the UK: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies |
title_full | Expectations and experiences of hospital postnatal care in the UK: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies |
title_fullStr | Expectations and experiences of hospital postnatal care in the UK: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Expectations and experiences of hospital postnatal care in the UK: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies |
title_short | Expectations and experiences of hospital postnatal care in the UK: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies |
title_sort | expectations and experiences of hospital postnatal care in the uk: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies |
topic | Obstetrics and Gynaecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6661900/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31320339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022212 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maloufreem expectationsandexperiencesofhospitalpostnatalcareintheukasystematicreviewofquantitativeandqualitativestudies AT hendersonjane expectationsandexperiencesofhospitalpostnatalcareintheukasystematicreviewofquantitativeandqualitativestudies AT alderdicefiona expectationsandexperiencesofhospitalpostnatalcareintheukasystematicreviewofquantitativeandqualitativestudies |