Cargando…
Local ozone (O(2)–O(3)) versus corticosteroid injection efficacy in plantar fasciitis treatment: a double-blinded RCT
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of local ozone injection versus corticosteroid in plantar fasciopathy treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This double-blinded randomized trial was performed on 44 adult patients with plantar fasciopathy. One group (23 patients) received local injection of 40 mg methylpr...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6661991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31413624 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S202045 |
_version_ | 1783439566134312960 |
---|---|
author | Bahrami, Mohammad Hassan Raeissadat, Seyed Ahmad Barchinejad, Mahboobeh Elyaspour, Dariush Rahimi-Dehgolan, Shahram |
author_facet | Bahrami, Mohammad Hassan Raeissadat, Seyed Ahmad Barchinejad, Mahboobeh Elyaspour, Dariush Rahimi-Dehgolan, Shahram |
author_sort | Bahrami, Mohammad Hassan |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of local ozone injection versus corticosteroid in plantar fasciopathy treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This double-blinded randomized trial was performed on 44 adult patients with plantar fasciopathy. One group (23 patients) received local injection of 40 mg methylprednisolone, while a local injection of 3 cc oxygen-ozone solution was performed for the other group (21 subjects). Severity of pain, functional level, and pressure-pain threshold (PPT) were measured before treatment and 1, 4, and 12 weeks after injection using VAS, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) questionnaire, and algometer for PPT, respectively. RESULTS: The majority (65.9%) of the total 44 patients analyzed, were women. Both treatments efficiently relieved patients' pain and improved their functions at 1 and 3 months follow-up time-points. But one week after injection, the improvement in VAS (p<0.001) and FAAM (p<0.001) was significant only in the corticosteroid group. During the first month, VAS (p=0.35) and PPT (p=0.003) were still better in the corticosteroid group. However, FAAM revealed no remarkable difference between the two groups (p=0.083). Eventually, at the third month of follow-up, there was no remarkable preference between the treatments regarding any of the outcome measures (p>0.05). Nevertheless, both methods efficiently improved patients' symptoms, ie, over the 50% of pain reduction and 30% improvement in functional status. CONCLUSION: The present results showed no remarkable superiority between the two groups. In other words, although ozone injection showed a slower efficacy than methylprednisolone, it could be used in plantar fasciitis management as an appropriate alternative. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6661991 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66619912019-08-14 Local ozone (O(2)–O(3)) versus corticosteroid injection efficacy in plantar fasciitis treatment: a double-blinded RCT Bahrami, Mohammad Hassan Raeissadat, Seyed Ahmad Barchinejad, Mahboobeh Elyaspour, Dariush Rahimi-Dehgolan, Shahram J Pain Res Original Research PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of local ozone injection versus corticosteroid in plantar fasciopathy treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This double-blinded randomized trial was performed on 44 adult patients with plantar fasciopathy. One group (23 patients) received local injection of 40 mg methylprednisolone, while a local injection of 3 cc oxygen-ozone solution was performed for the other group (21 subjects). Severity of pain, functional level, and pressure-pain threshold (PPT) were measured before treatment and 1, 4, and 12 weeks after injection using VAS, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) questionnaire, and algometer for PPT, respectively. RESULTS: The majority (65.9%) of the total 44 patients analyzed, were women. Both treatments efficiently relieved patients' pain and improved their functions at 1 and 3 months follow-up time-points. But one week after injection, the improvement in VAS (p<0.001) and FAAM (p<0.001) was significant only in the corticosteroid group. During the first month, VAS (p=0.35) and PPT (p=0.003) were still better in the corticosteroid group. However, FAAM revealed no remarkable difference between the two groups (p=0.083). Eventually, at the third month of follow-up, there was no remarkable preference between the treatments regarding any of the outcome measures (p>0.05). Nevertheless, both methods efficiently improved patients' symptoms, ie, over the 50% of pain reduction and 30% improvement in functional status. CONCLUSION: The present results showed no remarkable superiority between the two groups. In other words, although ozone injection showed a slower efficacy than methylprednisolone, it could be used in plantar fasciitis management as an appropriate alternative. Dove 2019-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6661991/ /pubmed/31413624 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S202045 Text en © 2019 Bahrami et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Bahrami, Mohammad Hassan Raeissadat, Seyed Ahmad Barchinejad, Mahboobeh Elyaspour, Dariush Rahimi-Dehgolan, Shahram Local ozone (O(2)–O(3)) versus corticosteroid injection efficacy in plantar fasciitis treatment: a double-blinded RCT |
title | Local ozone (O(2)–O(3)) versus corticosteroid injection efficacy in plantar fasciitis treatment: a double-blinded RCT |
title_full | Local ozone (O(2)–O(3)) versus corticosteroid injection efficacy in plantar fasciitis treatment: a double-blinded RCT |
title_fullStr | Local ozone (O(2)–O(3)) versus corticosteroid injection efficacy in plantar fasciitis treatment: a double-blinded RCT |
title_full_unstemmed | Local ozone (O(2)–O(3)) versus corticosteroid injection efficacy in plantar fasciitis treatment: a double-blinded RCT |
title_short | Local ozone (O(2)–O(3)) versus corticosteroid injection efficacy in plantar fasciitis treatment: a double-blinded RCT |
title_sort | local ozone (o(2)–o(3)) versus corticosteroid injection efficacy in plantar fasciitis treatment: a double-blinded rct |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6661991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31413624 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S202045 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bahramimohammadhassan localozoneo2o3versuscorticosteroidinjectionefficacyinplantarfasciitistreatmentadoubleblindedrct AT raeissadatseyedahmad localozoneo2o3versuscorticosteroidinjectionefficacyinplantarfasciitistreatmentadoubleblindedrct AT barchinejadmahboobeh localozoneo2o3versuscorticosteroidinjectionefficacyinplantarfasciitistreatmentadoubleblindedrct AT elyaspourdariush localozoneo2o3versuscorticosteroidinjectionefficacyinplantarfasciitistreatmentadoubleblindedrct AT rahimidehgolanshahram localozoneo2o3versuscorticosteroidinjectionefficacyinplantarfasciitistreatmentadoubleblindedrct |