Cargando…

Local ozone (O(2)–O(3)) versus corticosteroid injection efficacy in plantar fasciitis treatment: a double-blinded RCT

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of local ozone injection versus corticosteroid in plantar fasciopathy treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This double-blinded randomized trial was performed on 44 adult patients with plantar fasciopathy. One group (23 patients) received local injection of 40 mg methylpr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bahrami, Mohammad Hassan, Raeissadat, Seyed Ahmad, Barchinejad, Mahboobeh, Elyaspour, Dariush, Rahimi-Dehgolan, Shahram
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6661991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31413624
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S202045
_version_ 1783439566134312960
author Bahrami, Mohammad Hassan
Raeissadat, Seyed Ahmad
Barchinejad, Mahboobeh
Elyaspour, Dariush
Rahimi-Dehgolan, Shahram
author_facet Bahrami, Mohammad Hassan
Raeissadat, Seyed Ahmad
Barchinejad, Mahboobeh
Elyaspour, Dariush
Rahimi-Dehgolan, Shahram
author_sort Bahrami, Mohammad Hassan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of local ozone injection versus corticosteroid in plantar fasciopathy treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This double-blinded randomized trial was performed on 44 adult patients with plantar fasciopathy. One group (23 patients) received local injection of 40 mg methylprednisolone, while a local injection of 3 cc oxygen-ozone solution was performed for the other group (21 subjects). Severity of pain, functional level, and pressure-pain threshold (PPT) were measured before treatment and 1, 4, and 12 weeks after injection using VAS, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) questionnaire, and algometer for PPT, respectively. RESULTS: The majority (65.9%) of the total 44 patients analyzed, were women. Both treatments efficiently relieved patients' pain and improved their functions at 1 and 3 months follow-up time-points. But one week after injection, the improvement in VAS (p<0.001) and FAAM (p<0.001) was significant only in the corticosteroid group. During the first month, VAS (p=0.35) and PPT (p=0.003) were still better in the corticosteroid group. However, FAAM revealed no remarkable difference between the two groups (p=0.083). Eventually, at the third month of follow-up, there was no remarkable preference between the treatments regarding any of the outcome measures (p>0.05). Nevertheless, both methods efficiently improved patients' symptoms, ie, over the 50% of pain reduction and 30% improvement in functional status. CONCLUSION: The present results showed no remarkable superiority between the two groups. In other words, although ozone injection showed a slower efficacy than methylprednisolone, it could be used in plantar fasciitis management as an appropriate alternative.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6661991
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66619912019-08-14 Local ozone (O(2)–O(3)) versus corticosteroid injection efficacy in plantar fasciitis treatment: a double-blinded RCT Bahrami, Mohammad Hassan Raeissadat, Seyed Ahmad Barchinejad, Mahboobeh Elyaspour, Dariush Rahimi-Dehgolan, Shahram J Pain Res Original Research PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of local ozone injection versus corticosteroid in plantar fasciopathy treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This double-blinded randomized trial was performed on 44 adult patients with plantar fasciopathy. One group (23 patients) received local injection of 40 mg methylprednisolone, while a local injection of 3 cc oxygen-ozone solution was performed for the other group (21 subjects). Severity of pain, functional level, and pressure-pain threshold (PPT) were measured before treatment and 1, 4, and 12 weeks after injection using VAS, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) questionnaire, and algometer for PPT, respectively. RESULTS: The majority (65.9%) of the total 44 patients analyzed, were women. Both treatments efficiently relieved patients' pain and improved their functions at 1 and 3 months follow-up time-points. But one week after injection, the improvement in VAS (p<0.001) and FAAM (p<0.001) was significant only in the corticosteroid group. During the first month, VAS (p=0.35) and PPT (p=0.003) were still better in the corticosteroid group. However, FAAM revealed no remarkable difference between the two groups (p=0.083). Eventually, at the third month of follow-up, there was no remarkable preference between the treatments regarding any of the outcome measures (p>0.05). Nevertheless, both methods efficiently improved patients' symptoms, ie, over the 50% of pain reduction and 30% improvement in functional status. CONCLUSION: The present results showed no remarkable superiority between the two groups. In other words, although ozone injection showed a slower efficacy than methylprednisolone, it could be used in plantar fasciitis management as an appropriate alternative. Dove 2019-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6661991/ /pubmed/31413624 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S202045 Text en © 2019 Bahrami et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Bahrami, Mohammad Hassan
Raeissadat, Seyed Ahmad
Barchinejad, Mahboobeh
Elyaspour, Dariush
Rahimi-Dehgolan, Shahram
Local ozone (O(2)–O(3)) versus corticosteroid injection efficacy in plantar fasciitis treatment: a double-blinded RCT
title Local ozone (O(2)–O(3)) versus corticosteroid injection efficacy in plantar fasciitis treatment: a double-blinded RCT
title_full Local ozone (O(2)–O(3)) versus corticosteroid injection efficacy in plantar fasciitis treatment: a double-blinded RCT
title_fullStr Local ozone (O(2)–O(3)) versus corticosteroid injection efficacy in plantar fasciitis treatment: a double-blinded RCT
title_full_unstemmed Local ozone (O(2)–O(3)) versus corticosteroid injection efficacy in plantar fasciitis treatment: a double-blinded RCT
title_short Local ozone (O(2)–O(3)) versus corticosteroid injection efficacy in plantar fasciitis treatment: a double-blinded RCT
title_sort local ozone (o(2)–o(3)) versus corticosteroid injection efficacy in plantar fasciitis treatment: a double-blinded rct
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6661991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31413624
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S202045
work_keys_str_mv AT bahramimohammadhassan localozoneo2o3versuscorticosteroidinjectionefficacyinplantarfasciitistreatmentadoubleblindedrct
AT raeissadatseyedahmad localozoneo2o3versuscorticosteroidinjectionefficacyinplantarfasciitistreatmentadoubleblindedrct
AT barchinejadmahboobeh localozoneo2o3versuscorticosteroidinjectionefficacyinplantarfasciitistreatmentadoubleblindedrct
AT elyaspourdariush localozoneo2o3versuscorticosteroidinjectionefficacyinplantarfasciitistreatmentadoubleblindedrct
AT rahimidehgolanshahram localozoneo2o3versuscorticosteroidinjectionefficacyinplantarfasciitistreatmentadoubleblindedrct