Cargando…
Performance of the American Heart Association (AHA) 14‐Point Evaluation Versus Electrocardiography for the Cardiovascular Screening of High School Athletes: A Prospective Study
BACKGROUND: Preparticipation cardiovascular screening in athletes is fully endorsed by major medical societies, yet the most effective screening protocol remains debated. We prospectively compared the performance of the American Heart Association (AHA) 14‐point screening evaluation and a resting ECG...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6662133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31286819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.012235 |
_version_ | 1783439598741880832 |
---|---|
author | Williams, Elizabeth A. Pelto, Hank F. Toresdahl, Brett G. Prutkin, Jordan M. Owens, David S. Salerno, Jack C. Harmon, Kimberly G. Drezner, Jonathan A. |
author_facet | Williams, Elizabeth A. Pelto, Hank F. Toresdahl, Brett G. Prutkin, Jordan M. Owens, David S. Salerno, Jack C. Harmon, Kimberly G. Drezner, Jonathan A. |
author_sort | Williams, Elizabeth A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Preparticipation cardiovascular screening in athletes is fully endorsed by major medical societies, yet the most effective screening protocol remains debated. We prospectively compared the performance of the American Heart Association (AHA) 14‐point screening evaluation and a resting ECG for cardiovascular screening of high school athletes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Competitive athletes participating in organized high school or premier/select level sports underwent cardiovascular screening using the AHA 14‐point history and physical examination, and an ECG interpreted with the Seattle Criteria. A limited echocardiogram was performed for all screening abnormalities. The primary outcome measure was identification of a cardiovascular disorder associated with sudden cardiac death. From October 2014 to June 2017, 3620 high school athletes (median age, 16 years; range 13–19; 46.2% female; 78.6% white, 8.0% black) were screened. One or more positive responses to the AHA 14‐point questionnaire were present in 814 (22.5%) athletes. The most common history responses included chest pain (8.1%), family history of inheritable conditions (7.3%), and shortness of breath (6.4%). Abnormal physical examination was present in 356 (9.8%) athletes, and 103 (2.8%) athletes had an abnormal ECG. Sixteen (0.4%) athletes had conditions associated with sudden cardiac death. The sensitivity (18.8%), specificity (68.0%), and positive predictive value (0.3%) of the AHA 14‐point evaluation was substantially lower than the sensitivity (87.5%), specificity (97.5%), and positive predictive value (13.6%) of ECG. CONCLUSIONS: The AHA 14‐point evaluation performs poorly compared with ECG for cardiovascular screening of high school athletes. The use of consensus‐derived history questionnaires as the primary tool for cardiovascular screening in athletes should be reevaluated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6662133 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66621332019-08-02 Performance of the American Heart Association (AHA) 14‐Point Evaluation Versus Electrocardiography for the Cardiovascular Screening of High School Athletes: A Prospective Study Williams, Elizabeth A. Pelto, Hank F. Toresdahl, Brett G. Prutkin, Jordan M. Owens, David S. Salerno, Jack C. Harmon, Kimberly G. Drezner, Jonathan A. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Preparticipation cardiovascular screening in athletes is fully endorsed by major medical societies, yet the most effective screening protocol remains debated. We prospectively compared the performance of the American Heart Association (AHA) 14‐point screening evaluation and a resting ECG for cardiovascular screening of high school athletes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Competitive athletes participating in organized high school or premier/select level sports underwent cardiovascular screening using the AHA 14‐point history and physical examination, and an ECG interpreted with the Seattle Criteria. A limited echocardiogram was performed for all screening abnormalities. The primary outcome measure was identification of a cardiovascular disorder associated with sudden cardiac death. From October 2014 to June 2017, 3620 high school athletes (median age, 16 years; range 13–19; 46.2% female; 78.6% white, 8.0% black) were screened. One or more positive responses to the AHA 14‐point questionnaire were present in 814 (22.5%) athletes. The most common history responses included chest pain (8.1%), family history of inheritable conditions (7.3%), and shortness of breath (6.4%). Abnormal physical examination was present in 356 (9.8%) athletes, and 103 (2.8%) athletes had an abnormal ECG. Sixteen (0.4%) athletes had conditions associated with sudden cardiac death. The sensitivity (18.8%), specificity (68.0%), and positive predictive value (0.3%) of the AHA 14‐point evaluation was substantially lower than the sensitivity (87.5%), specificity (97.5%), and positive predictive value (13.6%) of ECG. CONCLUSIONS: The AHA 14‐point evaluation performs poorly compared with ECG for cardiovascular screening of high school athletes. The use of consensus‐derived history questionnaires as the primary tool for cardiovascular screening in athletes should be reevaluated. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6662133/ /pubmed/31286819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.012235 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Williams, Elizabeth A. Pelto, Hank F. Toresdahl, Brett G. Prutkin, Jordan M. Owens, David S. Salerno, Jack C. Harmon, Kimberly G. Drezner, Jonathan A. Performance of the American Heart Association (AHA) 14‐Point Evaluation Versus Electrocardiography for the Cardiovascular Screening of High School Athletes: A Prospective Study |
title | Performance of the American Heart Association (AHA) 14‐Point Evaluation Versus Electrocardiography for the Cardiovascular Screening of High School Athletes: A Prospective Study |
title_full | Performance of the American Heart Association (AHA) 14‐Point Evaluation Versus Electrocardiography for the Cardiovascular Screening of High School Athletes: A Prospective Study |
title_fullStr | Performance of the American Heart Association (AHA) 14‐Point Evaluation Versus Electrocardiography for the Cardiovascular Screening of High School Athletes: A Prospective Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance of the American Heart Association (AHA) 14‐Point Evaluation Versus Electrocardiography for the Cardiovascular Screening of High School Athletes: A Prospective Study |
title_short | Performance of the American Heart Association (AHA) 14‐Point Evaluation Versus Electrocardiography for the Cardiovascular Screening of High School Athletes: A Prospective Study |
title_sort | performance of the american heart association (aha) 14‐point evaluation versus electrocardiography for the cardiovascular screening of high school athletes: a prospective study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6662133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31286819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.012235 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT williamselizabetha performanceoftheamericanheartassociationaha14pointevaluationversuselectrocardiographyforthecardiovascularscreeningofhighschoolathletesaprospectivestudy AT peltohankf performanceoftheamericanheartassociationaha14pointevaluationversuselectrocardiographyforthecardiovascularscreeningofhighschoolathletesaprospectivestudy AT toresdahlbrettg performanceoftheamericanheartassociationaha14pointevaluationversuselectrocardiographyforthecardiovascularscreeningofhighschoolathletesaprospectivestudy AT prutkinjordanm performanceoftheamericanheartassociationaha14pointevaluationversuselectrocardiographyforthecardiovascularscreeningofhighschoolathletesaprospectivestudy AT owensdavids performanceoftheamericanheartassociationaha14pointevaluationversuselectrocardiographyforthecardiovascularscreeningofhighschoolathletesaprospectivestudy AT salernojackc performanceoftheamericanheartassociationaha14pointevaluationversuselectrocardiographyforthecardiovascularscreeningofhighschoolathletesaprospectivestudy AT harmonkimberlyg performanceoftheamericanheartassociationaha14pointevaluationversuselectrocardiographyforthecardiovascularscreeningofhighschoolathletesaprospectivestudy AT dreznerjonathana performanceoftheamericanheartassociationaha14pointevaluationversuselectrocardiographyforthecardiovascularscreeningofhighschoolathletesaprospectivestudy |