Cargando…

Is MHC diversity a better marker for conservation than neutral genetic diversity? A case study of two contrasting dolphin populations

Genetic diversity is essential for populations to adapt to changing environments. Measures of genetic diversity are often based on selectively neutral markers, such as microsatellites. Genetic diversity to guide conservation management, however, is better reflected by adaptive markers, including gen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manlik, Oliver, Krützen, Michael, Kopps, Anna M., Mann, Janet, Bejder, Lars, Allen, Simon J., Frère, Celine, Connor, Richard C., Sherwin, William B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6662329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31380027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5265
_version_ 1783439626889854976
author Manlik, Oliver
Krützen, Michael
Kopps, Anna M.
Mann, Janet
Bejder, Lars
Allen, Simon J.
Frère, Celine
Connor, Richard C.
Sherwin, William B.
author_facet Manlik, Oliver
Krützen, Michael
Kopps, Anna M.
Mann, Janet
Bejder, Lars
Allen, Simon J.
Frère, Celine
Connor, Richard C.
Sherwin, William B.
author_sort Manlik, Oliver
collection PubMed
description Genetic diversity is essential for populations to adapt to changing environments. Measures of genetic diversity are often based on selectively neutral markers, such as microsatellites. Genetic diversity to guide conservation management, however, is better reflected by adaptive markers, including genes of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). Our aim was to assess MHC and neutral genetic diversity in two contrasting bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops aduncus) populations in Western Australia—one apparently viable population with high reproductive output (Shark Bay) and one with lower reproductive output that was forecast to decline (Bunbury). We assessed genetic variation in the two populations by sequencing the MHC class II DQB, which encompasses the functionally important peptide binding regions (PBR). Neutral genetic diversity was assessed by genotyping twenty‐three microsatellite loci. We confirmed that MHC is an adaptive marker in both populations. Overall, the Shark Bay population exhibited greater MHC diversity than the Bunbury population—for example, it displayed greater MHC nucleotide diversity. In contrast, the difference in microsatellite diversity between the two populations was comparatively low. Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that viable populations typically display greater genetic diversity than less viable populations. The results also suggest that MHC variation is more closely associated with population viability than neutral genetic variation. Although the inferences from our findings are limited, because we only compared two populations, our results add to a growing number of studies that highlight the usefulness of MHC as a potentially suitable genetic marker for animal conservation. The Shark Bay population, which carries greater adaptive genetic diversity than the Bunbury population, is thus likely more robust to natural or human‐induced changes to the coastal ecosystem it inhabits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6662329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66623292019-08-02 Is MHC diversity a better marker for conservation than neutral genetic diversity? A case study of two contrasting dolphin populations Manlik, Oliver Krützen, Michael Kopps, Anna M. Mann, Janet Bejder, Lars Allen, Simon J. Frère, Celine Connor, Richard C. Sherwin, William B. Ecol Evol Original Research Genetic diversity is essential for populations to adapt to changing environments. Measures of genetic diversity are often based on selectively neutral markers, such as microsatellites. Genetic diversity to guide conservation management, however, is better reflected by adaptive markers, including genes of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). Our aim was to assess MHC and neutral genetic diversity in two contrasting bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops aduncus) populations in Western Australia—one apparently viable population with high reproductive output (Shark Bay) and one with lower reproductive output that was forecast to decline (Bunbury). We assessed genetic variation in the two populations by sequencing the MHC class II DQB, which encompasses the functionally important peptide binding regions (PBR). Neutral genetic diversity was assessed by genotyping twenty‐three microsatellite loci. We confirmed that MHC is an adaptive marker in both populations. Overall, the Shark Bay population exhibited greater MHC diversity than the Bunbury population—for example, it displayed greater MHC nucleotide diversity. In contrast, the difference in microsatellite diversity between the two populations was comparatively low. Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that viable populations typically display greater genetic diversity than less viable populations. The results also suggest that MHC variation is more closely associated with population viability than neutral genetic variation. Although the inferences from our findings are limited, because we only compared two populations, our results add to a growing number of studies that highlight the usefulness of MHC as a potentially suitable genetic marker for animal conservation. The Shark Bay population, which carries greater adaptive genetic diversity than the Bunbury population, is thus likely more robust to natural or human‐induced changes to the coastal ecosystem it inhabits. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6662329/ /pubmed/31380027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5265 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Manlik, Oliver
Krützen, Michael
Kopps, Anna M.
Mann, Janet
Bejder, Lars
Allen, Simon J.
Frère, Celine
Connor, Richard C.
Sherwin, William B.
Is MHC diversity a better marker for conservation than neutral genetic diversity? A case study of two contrasting dolphin populations
title Is MHC diversity a better marker for conservation than neutral genetic diversity? A case study of two contrasting dolphin populations
title_full Is MHC diversity a better marker for conservation than neutral genetic diversity? A case study of two contrasting dolphin populations
title_fullStr Is MHC diversity a better marker for conservation than neutral genetic diversity? A case study of two contrasting dolphin populations
title_full_unstemmed Is MHC diversity a better marker for conservation than neutral genetic diversity? A case study of two contrasting dolphin populations
title_short Is MHC diversity a better marker for conservation than neutral genetic diversity? A case study of two contrasting dolphin populations
title_sort is mhc diversity a better marker for conservation than neutral genetic diversity? a case study of two contrasting dolphin populations
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6662329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31380027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5265
work_keys_str_mv AT manlikoliver ismhcdiversityabettermarkerforconservationthanneutralgeneticdiversityacasestudyoftwocontrastingdolphinpopulations
AT krutzenmichael ismhcdiversityabettermarkerforconservationthanneutralgeneticdiversityacasestudyoftwocontrastingdolphinpopulations
AT koppsannam ismhcdiversityabettermarkerforconservationthanneutralgeneticdiversityacasestudyoftwocontrastingdolphinpopulations
AT mannjanet ismhcdiversityabettermarkerforconservationthanneutralgeneticdiversityacasestudyoftwocontrastingdolphinpopulations
AT bejderlars ismhcdiversityabettermarkerforconservationthanneutralgeneticdiversityacasestudyoftwocontrastingdolphinpopulations
AT allensimonj ismhcdiversityabettermarkerforconservationthanneutralgeneticdiversityacasestudyoftwocontrastingdolphinpopulations
AT frereceline ismhcdiversityabettermarkerforconservationthanneutralgeneticdiversityacasestudyoftwocontrastingdolphinpopulations
AT connorrichardc ismhcdiversityabettermarkerforconservationthanneutralgeneticdiversityacasestudyoftwocontrastingdolphinpopulations
AT sherwinwilliamb ismhcdiversityabettermarkerforconservationthanneutralgeneticdiversityacasestudyoftwocontrastingdolphinpopulations