Cargando…

Comparison of physiological responses of Arabian striped hyaena (Hyaena hyaena sultana) to effective immobilisations with ketamine-medetomidine and ketamine-xylazine in (semi-) captive conditions

Chemical immobilisation is an integral component for the conservation of wild animals and can be stressful if proper protocols are not administered. References on the immobilisation of Arabian striped hyaena (Hyaena hyaena sultana) are scarce. The current study was designed to evaluate the physiolog...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mehmood, Abid, Abid, Sadia, Hejcmanová, Pavla, Asadi, Muhammad Arslan, Kabeer, Bilal, Jilani, Muhammad Jawad, Bilal, Sadaf, Ashraf, Muhammad Waseem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6662563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31388470
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7326
_version_ 1783439681210286080
author Mehmood, Abid
Abid, Sadia
Hejcmanová, Pavla
Asadi, Muhammad Arslan
Kabeer, Bilal
Jilani, Muhammad Jawad
Bilal, Sadaf
Ashraf, Muhammad Waseem
author_facet Mehmood, Abid
Abid, Sadia
Hejcmanová, Pavla
Asadi, Muhammad Arslan
Kabeer, Bilal
Jilani, Muhammad Jawad
Bilal, Sadaf
Ashraf, Muhammad Waseem
author_sort Mehmood, Abid
collection PubMed
description Chemical immobilisation is an integral component for the conservation of wild animals and can be stressful if proper protocols are not administered. References on the immobilisation of Arabian striped hyaena (Hyaena hyaena sultana) are scarce. The current study was designed to evaluate the physiological and clinical responses of Arabian striped hyaena, immobilised with ketamine-medetomidine (KM) and ketamine-xylazine (KX); and to compare immobilisation effectiveness of the two combinations in a cross-sectional clinical study. A total of 15 (six males, nine females) (semi-) captive and adult Arabian striped hyaena with an average weight of 31.39 ± 0.36 kg were immobilised 50 times for annual vaccination and translocation purposes from January 2014 till March 2018 on Sir Bani Yas Island, United Arab Emirates. A total of 34 immobilisations were executed with (Mean ± SE) 2.27 ± 0.044 mg/kg ketamine and 0.04 ± 0.001 mg/kg medetomidine; while 16 with 4.95 ± 0.115 mg/kg ketamine and 0.99 ± 0.023 mg/kg xylazine. The drugs were remotely delivered intramuscular. The evaluation of physiological and clinical parameters included monitoring of vital signs through pulse oximetry, blood gas analysis of arterial blood through Istat blood gas analyser, and blood biochemistry and haematology. The quality of induction, anaesthesia and recovery was also assessed. Atipamezole (0.21 ± 0.003 mg/kg) was used to antagonise the effects of KM and 0.09 ± 0.003 mg/kg atipamezole or by 0.23 ± 0.006 mg/kg yohimbine for KX. Data were analysed using the general linear model and inferential statistics. KM was more effective in induction (scores; KM = 1.41 ± 0.10; KX = 1.31 ± 0.12), anaesthesia (KM = 1.00 ± 0.00; KX = 2.0 ± 0.0) and recovery (KM = 1.76 ± 0.15; KX = 2.69 ± 0.12) phases as compared to KX. There was a significant difference (P < 0.05) amongst the two combinations for anaesthesia time (KM = 59.5 ± 2.41; KX = 49.25 ± 1.31 min.), time to stand after reversal (KM = 4.91 ± 0.60; KX = 10.38 ± 1.48 min.) and full loss of the signs of anaesthetics (KM = 12.32 ± 1.37; KX = 21.25 ± 2.16 min.) along with rectal temperature (KM = 37.58 ± 0.29; KX = 36.00 ± 0.68 °C), pulse rate (KM = 50.46 ± 1.90; KX = 61.14 ± 2.79 beats/min), respiration rate (KM = 29.44 ± 0.99; KX = 23.80 ± 1.57 breaths/min.) and partial pressure of oxygen (KM = 89.59 ± 1.34; KX = 82.06 ± 3.92%). The blood oxygen saturation by oximeter indicated hypoxaemia in KX (82.06 ± 3.92), supported by the data from blood gas analyser. KM combination was more suitable for the immobilisation of Arabian striped hyaena, providing a better quality of induction, anaesthesia and recovery compared to KX. However, we strongly suggest further investigation to see the effects of oxygen supplementation for the compensation of hypoxaemia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6662563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66625632019-08-06 Comparison of physiological responses of Arabian striped hyaena (Hyaena hyaena sultana) to effective immobilisations with ketamine-medetomidine and ketamine-xylazine in (semi-) captive conditions Mehmood, Abid Abid, Sadia Hejcmanová, Pavla Asadi, Muhammad Arslan Kabeer, Bilal Jilani, Muhammad Jawad Bilal, Sadaf Ashraf, Muhammad Waseem PeerJ Conservation Biology Chemical immobilisation is an integral component for the conservation of wild animals and can be stressful if proper protocols are not administered. References on the immobilisation of Arabian striped hyaena (Hyaena hyaena sultana) are scarce. The current study was designed to evaluate the physiological and clinical responses of Arabian striped hyaena, immobilised with ketamine-medetomidine (KM) and ketamine-xylazine (KX); and to compare immobilisation effectiveness of the two combinations in a cross-sectional clinical study. A total of 15 (six males, nine females) (semi-) captive and adult Arabian striped hyaena with an average weight of 31.39 ± 0.36 kg were immobilised 50 times for annual vaccination and translocation purposes from January 2014 till March 2018 on Sir Bani Yas Island, United Arab Emirates. A total of 34 immobilisations were executed with (Mean ± SE) 2.27 ± 0.044 mg/kg ketamine and 0.04 ± 0.001 mg/kg medetomidine; while 16 with 4.95 ± 0.115 mg/kg ketamine and 0.99 ± 0.023 mg/kg xylazine. The drugs were remotely delivered intramuscular. The evaluation of physiological and clinical parameters included monitoring of vital signs through pulse oximetry, blood gas analysis of arterial blood through Istat blood gas analyser, and blood biochemistry and haematology. The quality of induction, anaesthesia and recovery was also assessed. Atipamezole (0.21 ± 0.003 mg/kg) was used to antagonise the effects of KM and 0.09 ± 0.003 mg/kg atipamezole or by 0.23 ± 0.006 mg/kg yohimbine for KX. Data were analysed using the general linear model and inferential statistics. KM was more effective in induction (scores; KM = 1.41 ± 0.10; KX = 1.31 ± 0.12), anaesthesia (KM = 1.00 ± 0.00; KX = 2.0 ± 0.0) and recovery (KM = 1.76 ± 0.15; KX = 2.69 ± 0.12) phases as compared to KX. There was a significant difference (P < 0.05) amongst the two combinations for anaesthesia time (KM = 59.5 ± 2.41; KX = 49.25 ± 1.31 min.), time to stand after reversal (KM = 4.91 ± 0.60; KX = 10.38 ± 1.48 min.) and full loss of the signs of anaesthetics (KM = 12.32 ± 1.37; KX = 21.25 ± 2.16 min.) along with rectal temperature (KM = 37.58 ± 0.29; KX = 36.00 ± 0.68 °C), pulse rate (KM = 50.46 ± 1.90; KX = 61.14 ± 2.79 beats/min), respiration rate (KM = 29.44 ± 0.99; KX = 23.80 ± 1.57 breaths/min.) and partial pressure of oxygen (KM = 89.59 ± 1.34; KX = 82.06 ± 3.92%). The blood oxygen saturation by oximeter indicated hypoxaemia in KX (82.06 ± 3.92), supported by the data from blood gas analyser. KM combination was more suitable for the immobilisation of Arabian striped hyaena, providing a better quality of induction, anaesthesia and recovery compared to KX. However, we strongly suggest further investigation to see the effects of oxygen supplementation for the compensation of hypoxaemia. PeerJ Inc. 2019-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6662563/ /pubmed/31388470 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7326 Text en © 2019 Mehmood et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Conservation Biology
Mehmood, Abid
Abid, Sadia
Hejcmanová, Pavla
Asadi, Muhammad Arslan
Kabeer, Bilal
Jilani, Muhammad Jawad
Bilal, Sadaf
Ashraf, Muhammad Waseem
Comparison of physiological responses of Arabian striped hyaena (Hyaena hyaena sultana) to effective immobilisations with ketamine-medetomidine and ketamine-xylazine in (semi-) captive conditions
title Comparison of physiological responses of Arabian striped hyaena (Hyaena hyaena sultana) to effective immobilisations with ketamine-medetomidine and ketamine-xylazine in (semi-) captive conditions
title_full Comparison of physiological responses of Arabian striped hyaena (Hyaena hyaena sultana) to effective immobilisations with ketamine-medetomidine and ketamine-xylazine in (semi-) captive conditions
title_fullStr Comparison of physiological responses of Arabian striped hyaena (Hyaena hyaena sultana) to effective immobilisations with ketamine-medetomidine and ketamine-xylazine in (semi-) captive conditions
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of physiological responses of Arabian striped hyaena (Hyaena hyaena sultana) to effective immobilisations with ketamine-medetomidine and ketamine-xylazine in (semi-) captive conditions
title_short Comparison of physiological responses of Arabian striped hyaena (Hyaena hyaena sultana) to effective immobilisations with ketamine-medetomidine and ketamine-xylazine in (semi-) captive conditions
title_sort comparison of physiological responses of arabian striped hyaena (hyaena hyaena sultana) to effective immobilisations with ketamine-medetomidine and ketamine-xylazine in (semi-) captive conditions
topic Conservation Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6662563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31388470
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7326
work_keys_str_mv AT mehmoodabid comparisonofphysiologicalresponsesofarabianstripedhyaenahyaenahyaenasultanatoeffectiveimmobilisationswithketaminemedetomidineandketaminexylazineinsemicaptiveconditions
AT abidsadia comparisonofphysiologicalresponsesofarabianstripedhyaenahyaenahyaenasultanatoeffectiveimmobilisationswithketaminemedetomidineandketaminexylazineinsemicaptiveconditions
AT hejcmanovapavla comparisonofphysiologicalresponsesofarabianstripedhyaenahyaenahyaenasultanatoeffectiveimmobilisationswithketaminemedetomidineandketaminexylazineinsemicaptiveconditions
AT asadimuhammadarslan comparisonofphysiologicalresponsesofarabianstripedhyaenahyaenahyaenasultanatoeffectiveimmobilisationswithketaminemedetomidineandketaminexylazineinsemicaptiveconditions
AT kabeerbilal comparisonofphysiologicalresponsesofarabianstripedhyaenahyaenahyaenasultanatoeffectiveimmobilisationswithketaminemedetomidineandketaminexylazineinsemicaptiveconditions
AT jilanimuhammadjawad comparisonofphysiologicalresponsesofarabianstripedhyaenahyaenahyaenasultanatoeffectiveimmobilisationswithketaminemedetomidineandketaminexylazineinsemicaptiveconditions
AT bilalsadaf comparisonofphysiologicalresponsesofarabianstripedhyaenahyaenahyaenasultanatoeffectiveimmobilisationswithketaminemedetomidineandketaminexylazineinsemicaptiveconditions
AT ashrafmuhammadwaseem comparisonofphysiologicalresponsesofarabianstripedhyaenahyaenahyaenasultanatoeffectiveimmobilisationswithketaminemedetomidineandketaminexylazineinsemicaptiveconditions