Cargando…

Predictors of opinions on prison smoking bans: Analyses of survey data from Scottish staff and prisoners

INTRODUCTION: Policy-makers and practitioners need to understand characteristics associated with support for smoking restrictions to identify both potential allies and groups requiring particular support/targeted communication in the face of restrictions. Using data from prison staff and prisoners,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sweeting, Helen, Semple, Sean, Demou, Evangelia, Brown, Ashley, Hunt, Kate
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID) 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6662777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31516490
http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tid/109559
_version_ 1783439708209020928
author Sweeting, Helen
Semple, Sean
Demou, Evangelia
Brown, Ashley
Hunt, Kate
author_facet Sweeting, Helen
Semple, Sean
Demou, Evangelia
Brown, Ashley
Hunt, Kate
author_sort Sweeting, Helen
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Policy-makers and practitioners need to understand characteristics associated with support for smoking restrictions to identify both potential allies and groups requiring particular support/targeted communication in the face of restrictions. Using data from prison staff and prisoners, we explored the structure and correlates of opinions relating to prison smoking bans. METHODS: Questionnaires were completed by staff (online, N=1271; 27% return) and prisoners (paper-based, N=2512; 34%) in all 15 Scottish prisons in 2016–17. At that time, prisoners could smoke in their own cells and during outdoor recreation; staff smoking was prohibited anywhere on prison grounds. Staff and prisoner questionnaires included identical/very similar questions about opinions on smoking in prisons and prison smoking bans, own smoking behaviour, health and sociodemographic details. We also measured in every prison fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) as a proxy for secondhand smoke (SHS) levels. RESULTS: Principal components analysis identified two factors: ‘Positive about bans’ (higher scores among staff) and ‘Bans will be difficult’ (higher scores among prisoners). In multivariable analyses, ‘Positive about bans’ was associated with: not smoking (both staff and prisoners), better general health, more respiratory symptoms and working in an operational role among staff; and no asthma, more sensory symptoms, higher educational level and status/release date among prisoners. ‘Bans will be difficult’ was associated with: fewer sensory symptoms and lower prison SHS levels among staff and being a smoker among prisoners. In smoker-only analyses, heavier smokers were less positive about bans and more likely to believe bans will be difficult. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest it is possible to be positive about prison smoking bans whilst also recognising and/or concerned about potential operational difficulties, and that these opinions are associated with several characteristics additional to smoker status. Support for future prison bans may be stronger if staff have access to objective SHS exposure measures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6662777
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66627772019-09-12 Predictors of opinions on prison smoking bans: Analyses of survey data from Scottish staff and prisoners Sweeting, Helen Semple, Sean Demou, Evangelia Brown, Ashley Hunt, Kate Tob Induc Dis Research Paper INTRODUCTION: Policy-makers and practitioners need to understand characteristics associated with support for smoking restrictions to identify both potential allies and groups requiring particular support/targeted communication in the face of restrictions. Using data from prison staff and prisoners, we explored the structure and correlates of opinions relating to prison smoking bans. METHODS: Questionnaires were completed by staff (online, N=1271; 27% return) and prisoners (paper-based, N=2512; 34%) in all 15 Scottish prisons in 2016–17. At that time, prisoners could smoke in their own cells and during outdoor recreation; staff smoking was prohibited anywhere on prison grounds. Staff and prisoner questionnaires included identical/very similar questions about opinions on smoking in prisons and prison smoking bans, own smoking behaviour, health and sociodemographic details. We also measured in every prison fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) as a proxy for secondhand smoke (SHS) levels. RESULTS: Principal components analysis identified two factors: ‘Positive about bans’ (higher scores among staff) and ‘Bans will be difficult’ (higher scores among prisoners). In multivariable analyses, ‘Positive about bans’ was associated with: not smoking (both staff and prisoners), better general health, more respiratory symptoms and working in an operational role among staff; and no asthma, more sensory symptoms, higher educational level and status/release date among prisoners. ‘Bans will be difficult’ was associated with: fewer sensory symptoms and lower prison SHS levels among staff and being a smoker among prisoners. In smoker-only analyses, heavier smokers were less positive about bans and more likely to believe bans will be difficult. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest it is possible to be positive about prison smoking bans whilst also recognising and/or concerned about potential operational difficulties, and that these opinions are associated with several characteristics additional to smoker status. Support for future prison bans may be stronger if staff have access to objective SHS exposure measures. European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID) 2019-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6662777/ /pubmed/31516490 http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tid/109559 Text en © 2019 Sweeting H https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Sweeting, Helen
Semple, Sean
Demou, Evangelia
Brown, Ashley
Hunt, Kate
Predictors of opinions on prison smoking bans: Analyses of survey data from Scottish staff and prisoners
title Predictors of opinions on prison smoking bans: Analyses of survey data from Scottish staff and prisoners
title_full Predictors of opinions on prison smoking bans: Analyses of survey data from Scottish staff and prisoners
title_fullStr Predictors of opinions on prison smoking bans: Analyses of survey data from Scottish staff and prisoners
title_full_unstemmed Predictors of opinions on prison smoking bans: Analyses of survey data from Scottish staff and prisoners
title_short Predictors of opinions on prison smoking bans: Analyses of survey data from Scottish staff and prisoners
title_sort predictors of opinions on prison smoking bans: analyses of survey data from scottish staff and prisoners
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6662777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31516490
http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tid/109559
work_keys_str_mv AT sweetinghelen predictorsofopinionsonprisonsmokingbansanalysesofsurveydatafromscottishstaffandprisoners
AT semplesean predictorsofopinionsonprisonsmokingbansanalysesofsurveydatafromscottishstaffandprisoners
AT demouevangelia predictorsofopinionsonprisonsmokingbansanalysesofsurveydatafromscottishstaffandprisoners
AT brownashley predictorsofopinionsonprisonsmokingbansanalysesofsurveydatafromscottishstaffandprisoners
AT huntkate predictorsofopinionsonprisonsmokingbansanalysesofsurveydatafromscottishstaffandprisoners