Cargando…

Sex differences in cardiovascular risk management for people with diabetes in primary care: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is a stronger risk factor for cardiovascular complications in women than men. AIM: To evaluate whether there are sex differences in cardiovascular risk management in patients with diabetes in primary care. DESIGN & SETTING: A cross-sectional study was undertaken using data f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Jong, Marit, Vos, Rimke C, de Ritter, Rianneke, van der Kallen, Carla J, Sep, Simone J, Woodward, Mark, Stehouwer, Coen DA, Bots, Michiel L, Peters, Sanne AE
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6662874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31366676
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen19X101645
_version_ 1783439731012403200
author de Jong, Marit
Vos, Rimke C
de Ritter, Rianneke
van der Kallen, Carla J
Sep, Simone J
Woodward, Mark
Stehouwer, Coen DA
Bots, Michiel L
Peters, Sanne AE
author_facet de Jong, Marit
Vos, Rimke C
de Ritter, Rianneke
van der Kallen, Carla J
Sep, Simone J
Woodward, Mark
Stehouwer, Coen DA
Bots, Michiel L
Peters, Sanne AE
author_sort de Jong, Marit
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diabetes is a stronger risk factor for cardiovascular complications in women than men. AIM: To evaluate whether there are sex differences in cardiovascular risk management in patients with diabetes in primary care. DESIGN & SETTING: A cross-sectional study was undertaken using data from 12 512 individuals with diabetes within the Dutch Julius General Practitioners Network (JGPN) from 2013. METHOD: Linear and Poisson regression analyses were used to assess sex differences in risk factor levels, assessment, treatment, and control. RESULTS: No sex differences were found in HbA1c levels and control, while small differences were found for cardiovascular risk management. Blood pressure levels were higher (mean difference [MD] 1.09 mmHg; 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 0.41 to 1.77), while cholesterol levels (MD -0.38 mmol/l; 95% CI = -0.42 to -0.34) and body mass index ([BMI] MD -1.79 kg/m(2); 95% CI = -2.03 to 1.56) were lower in men than women. Risk factor assessment was similar between sexes, apart from high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), which was more commonly assessed in women (risk ratio [RR] 1.16; 95% CI = 1.13 to 1.20). Among those with a treatment indication for prevention, women with cardiovascular disease (CVD) were less likely to receive lipid-lowering drugs (RR 0.84; 95% CI = 0.76 to 0.93) than men, while women without CVD were more likely to receive lipid-lowering drugs (RR 1.16; 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.2). Among those treated, women were more likely to achieve systolic blood pressure (SBP) control (RR 1.06; 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.10) and less likely to achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) control (RR 0.88; 95% CI = 0.85 to 0.91) than men. CONCLUSION: In this Dutch primary care setting, sex differences in risk factor assessment and treatment of people with diabetes were small. However, women with diabetes were less likely to achieve control for LDL-c and more likely to achieve blood pressure control than men with diabetes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6662874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66628742019-08-13 Sex differences in cardiovascular risk management for people with diabetes in primary care: a cross-sectional study de Jong, Marit Vos, Rimke C de Ritter, Rianneke van der Kallen, Carla J Sep, Simone J Woodward, Mark Stehouwer, Coen DA Bots, Michiel L Peters, Sanne AE BJGP Open Research BACKGROUND: Diabetes is a stronger risk factor for cardiovascular complications in women than men. AIM: To evaluate whether there are sex differences in cardiovascular risk management in patients with diabetes in primary care. DESIGN & SETTING: A cross-sectional study was undertaken using data from 12 512 individuals with diabetes within the Dutch Julius General Practitioners Network (JGPN) from 2013. METHOD: Linear and Poisson regression analyses were used to assess sex differences in risk factor levels, assessment, treatment, and control. RESULTS: No sex differences were found in HbA1c levels and control, while small differences were found for cardiovascular risk management. Blood pressure levels were higher (mean difference [MD] 1.09 mmHg; 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 0.41 to 1.77), while cholesterol levels (MD -0.38 mmol/l; 95% CI = -0.42 to -0.34) and body mass index ([BMI] MD -1.79 kg/m(2); 95% CI = -2.03 to 1.56) were lower in men than women. Risk factor assessment was similar between sexes, apart from high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), which was more commonly assessed in women (risk ratio [RR] 1.16; 95% CI = 1.13 to 1.20). Among those with a treatment indication for prevention, women with cardiovascular disease (CVD) were less likely to receive lipid-lowering drugs (RR 0.84; 95% CI = 0.76 to 0.93) than men, while women without CVD were more likely to receive lipid-lowering drugs (RR 1.16; 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.2). Among those treated, women were more likely to achieve systolic blood pressure (SBP) control (RR 1.06; 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.10) and less likely to achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) control (RR 0.88; 95% CI = 0.85 to 0.91) than men. CONCLUSION: In this Dutch primary care setting, sex differences in risk factor assessment and treatment of people with diabetes were small. However, women with diabetes were less likely to achieve control for LDL-c and more likely to achieve blood pressure control than men with diabetes. Royal College of General Practitioners 2019-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6662874/ /pubmed/31366676 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen19X101645 Text en Copyright © 2019, The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Research
de Jong, Marit
Vos, Rimke C
de Ritter, Rianneke
van der Kallen, Carla J
Sep, Simone J
Woodward, Mark
Stehouwer, Coen DA
Bots, Michiel L
Peters, Sanne AE
Sex differences in cardiovascular risk management for people with diabetes in primary care: a cross-sectional study
title Sex differences in cardiovascular risk management for people with diabetes in primary care: a cross-sectional study
title_full Sex differences in cardiovascular risk management for people with diabetes in primary care: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Sex differences in cardiovascular risk management for people with diabetes in primary care: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Sex differences in cardiovascular risk management for people with diabetes in primary care: a cross-sectional study
title_short Sex differences in cardiovascular risk management for people with diabetes in primary care: a cross-sectional study
title_sort sex differences in cardiovascular risk management for people with diabetes in primary care: a cross-sectional study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6662874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31366676
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen19X101645
work_keys_str_mv AT dejongmarit sexdifferencesincardiovascularriskmanagementforpeoplewithdiabetesinprimarycareacrosssectionalstudy
AT vosrimkec sexdifferencesincardiovascularriskmanagementforpeoplewithdiabetesinprimarycareacrosssectionalstudy
AT deritterrianneke sexdifferencesincardiovascularriskmanagementforpeoplewithdiabetesinprimarycareacrosssectionalstudy
AT vanderkallencarlaj sexdifferencesincardiovascularriskmanagementforpeoplewithdiabetesinprimarycareacrosssectionalstudy
AT sepsimonej sexdifferencesincardiovascularriskmanagementforpeoplewithdiabetesinprimarycareacrosssectionalstudy
AT woodwardmark sexdifferencesincardiovascularriskmanagementforpeoplewithdiabetesinprimarycareacrosssectionalstudy
AT stehouwercoenda sexdifferencesincardiovascularriskmanagementforpeoplewithdiabetesinprimarycareacrosssectionalstudy
AT botsmichiell sexdifferencesincardiovascularriskmanagementforpeoplewithdiabetesinprimarycareacrosssectionalstudy
AT peterssanneae sexdifferencesincardiovascularriskmanagementforpeoplewithdiabetesinprimarycareacrosssectionalstudy