Cargando…
Second-line HIV treatment failure in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Increased second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) failure rate narrows future options for HIV/AIDS treatment. It has critical implications in resource-limited settings; including sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) where the burden of HIV-infection is immense. Hence, pooled estimate for second-lin...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6663009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31356613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220159 |
_version_ | 1783439749622530048 |
---|---|
author | Edessa, Dumessa Sisay, Mekonnen Asefa, Fekede |
author_facet | Edessa, Dumessa Sisay, Mekonnen Asefa, Fekede |
author_sort | Edessa, Dumessa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Increased second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) failure rate narrows future options for HIV/AIDS treatment. It has critical implications in resource-limited settings; including sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) where the burden of HIV-infection is immense. Hence, pooled estimate for second-line HIV treatment failure is relevant to suggest valid recommendations that optimize ART outcomes in SSA. METHODS: We retrieved literature systematically from PUBMED/MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and AJOL. The retrieved studies were screened and assessed for eligibility. We also assessed the eligible studies for their methodological quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute’s appraisal checklist. The pooled estimates for second-line HIV treatment failure and its associated factors were determined using STATA, version 15.0 and MEDCALC, version 18.11.3, respectively. We assessed publication bias using Comprehensive Meta-analysis software, version 3. Detailed study protocol for this review/meta-analysis is registered and found on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42018118959). RESULTS: A total of 33 studies with the overall 18,550 participants and 19,988.45 person-years (PYs) of follow-up were included in the review. The pooled second-line HIV treatment failure rate was 15.0 per 100 PYs (95% CI: 13.0–18.0). It was slightly higher at 12–18 months of follow-up (19.0/100 PYs; 95% CI: 15.0–22.0), in children (19.0/100 PYs; 95% CI: 14.0–23.0) and in southern SSA (18.0/100 PYs; 95% CI: 14.0–23.0). Baseline values (high viral load (OR: 5.67; 95% CI: 13.40–9.45); advanced clinical stage (OR: 3.27; 95% CI: 2.07–5.19); and low CD4 counts (OR: 2.80; 95% CI: 1.83–4.29)) and suboptimal adherence to therapy (OR: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.28–2.86) were the factors associated with increased failure rates. CONCLUSION: Second-line HIV treatment failure has become highly prevalent in SSA with alarming rates during the 12–18 month period of treatment start; in children; and southern SSA. Therefore, the second-line HIV treatment approach in SSA should critically consider excellent adherence to therapy, aggressive viral load suppression, and rapid immune recovery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6663009 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66630092019-08-07 Second-line HIV treatment failure in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis Edessa, Dumessa Sisay, Mekonnen Asefa, Fekede PLoS One Collection Review BACKGROUND: Increased second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) failure rate narrows future options for HIV/AIDS treatment. It has critical implications in resource-limited settings; including sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) where the burden of HIV-infection is immense. Hence, pooled estimate for second-line HIV treatment failure is relevant to suggest valid recommendations that optimize ART outcomes in SSA. METHODS: We retrieved literature systematically from PUBMED/MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and AJOL. The retrieved studies were screened and assessed for eligibility. We also assessed the eligible studies for their methodological quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute’s appraisal checklist. The pooled estimates for second-line HIV treatment failure and its associated factors were determined using STATA, version 15.0 and MEDCALC, version 18.11.3, respectively. We assessed publication bias using Comprehensive Meta-analysis software, version 3. Detailed study protocol for this review/meta-analysis is registered and found on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42018118959). RESULTS: A total of 33 studies with the overall 18,550 participants and 19,988.45 person-years (PYs) of follow-up were included in the review. The pooled second-line HIV treatment failure rate was 15.0 per 100 PYs (95% CI: 13.0–18.0). It was slightly higher at 12–18 months of follow-up (19.0/100 PYs; 95% CI: 15.0–22.0), in children (19.0/100 PYs; 95% CI: 14.0–23.0) and in southern SSA (18.0/100 PYs; 95% CI: 14.0–23.0). Baseline values (high viral load (OR: 5.67; 95% CI: 13.40–9.45); advanced clinical stage (OR: 3.27; 95% CI: 2.07–5.19); and low CD4 counts (OR: 2.80; 95% CI: 1.83–4.29)) and suboptimal adherence to therapy (OR: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.28–2.86) were the factors associated with increased failure rates. CONCLUSION: Second-line HIV treatment failure has become highly prevalent in SSA with alarming rates during the 12–18 month period of treatment start; in children; and southern SSA. Therefore, the second-line HIV treatment approach in SSA should critically consider excellent adherence to therapy, aggressive viral load suppression, and rapid immune recovery. Public Library of Science 2019-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6663009/ /pubmed/31356613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220159 Text en © 2019 Edessa et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Collection Review Edessa, Dumessa Sisay, Mekonnen Asefa, Fekede Second-line HIV treatment failure in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Second-line HIV treatment failure in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Second-line HIV treatment failure in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Second-line HIV treatment failure in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Second-line HIV treatment failure in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Second-line HIV treatment failure in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | second-line hiv treatment failure in sub-saharan africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Collection Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6663009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31356613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220159 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT edessadumessa secondlinehivtreatmentfailureinsubsaharanafricaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sisaymekonnen secondlinehivtreatmentfailureinsubsaharanafricaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT asefafekede secondlinehivtreatmentfailureinsubsaharanafricaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |