Cargando…

Dosing pole recommendations for lymphatic filariasis elimination: A height-weight quantile regression modeling approach

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) currently recommends height or age-based dosing as alternatives to weight-based dosing for mass drug administration lymphatic filariasis (LF) elimination programs. The goals of our study were to compare these alternative dosing strategies to weight-bas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goss, Charles W., O’Brian, Katiuscia, Dubray, Christine, Fischer, Peter U., Hardy, Myra, Jambulingam, Purushothaman, King, Christopher L., Laman, Moses, Lemoine, Jean Frantz, Robinson, Leanne J., Samuela, Josaia, Subramanian, Swaminathan, Supali, Taniawati, Weil, Gary J., Schechtman, Kenneth B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6663033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31314753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007541
_version_ 1783439755301617664
author Goss, Charles W.
O’Brian, Katiuscia
Dubray, Christine
Fischer, Peter U.
Hardy, Myra
Jambulingam, Purushothaman
King, Christopher L.
Laman, Moses
Lemoine, Jean Frantz
Robinson, Leanne J.
Samuela, Josaia
Subramanian, Swaminathan
Supali, Taniawati
Weil, Gary J.
Schechtman, Kenneth B.
author_facet Goss, Charles W.
O’Brian, Katiuscia
Dubray, Christine
Fischer, Peter U.
Hardy, Myra
Jambulingam, Purushothaman
King, Christopher L.
Laman, Moses
Lemoine, Jean Frantz
Robinson, Leanne J.
Samuela, Josaia
Subramanian, Swaminathan
Supali, Taniawati
Weil, Gary J.
Schechtman, Kenneth B.
author_sort Goss, Charles W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) currently recommends height or age-based dosing as alternatives to weight-based dosing for mass drug administration lymphatic filariasis (LF) elimination programs. The goals of our study were to compare these alternative dosing strategies to weight-based dosing and to develop and evaluate new height-based dosing pole scenarios. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Age, height and weight data were collected from >26,000 individuals in five countries during a cluster randomized LF clinical trial. Weight-based dosing for diethylcarbamazine (DEC; 6 mg/kg) and ivermectin (IVM; 200 ug/kg) with tablet numbers derived from a table of weight intervals was treated as the “gold standard” for this study. Following WHO recommended age-based dosing of DEC and height-based dosing of IVM would have resulted in 32% and 27% of individuals receiving treatment doses below those recommended by weight-based dosing for DEC and IVM, respectively. Underdosing would have been especially common in adult males, who tend to have the highest LF prevalence in many endemic areas. We used a 3-step modeling approach to develop and evaluate new dosing pole cutoffs. First, we analyzed the clinical trial data using quantile regression to predict weight from height. We then used weight predictions to develop new dosing pole cutoff values. Finally, we compared different dosing pole cutoffs and age and height-based WHO dosing recommendations to weight-based dosing. We considered hundreds of scenarios including country- and sex-specific dosing poles. A simple dosing pole with a 6-tablet maximum for both DEC and IVM reduced the underdosing rate by 30% and 21%, respectively, and was nearly as effective as more complex pole combinations for reducing underdosing. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Using a novel modeling approach, we developed a simple dosing pole that would markedly reduce underdosing for DEC and IVM in MDA programs compared to current WHO recommended height or age-based dosing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6663033
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66630332019-08-05 Dosing pole recommendations for lymphatic filariasis elimination: A height-weight quantile regression modeling approach Goss, Charles W. O’Brian, Katiuscia Dubray, Christine Fischer, Peter U. Hardy, Myra Jambulingam, Purushothaman King, Christopher L. Laman, Moses Lemoine, Jean Frantz Robinson, Leanne J. Samuela, Josaia Subramanian, Swaminathan Supali, Taniawati Weil, Gary J. Schechtman, Kenneth B. PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) currently recommends height or age-based dosing as alternatives to weight-based dosing for mass drug administration lymphatic filariasis (LF) elimination programs. The goals of our study were to compare these alternative dosing strategies to weight-based dosing and to develop and evaluate new height-based dosing pole scenarios. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Age, height and weight data were collected from >26,000 individuals in five countries during a cluster randomized LF clinical trial. Weight-based dosing for diethylcarbamazine (DEC; 6 mg/kg) and ivermectin (IVM; 200 ug/kg) with tablet numbers derived from a table of weight intervals was treated as the “gold standard” for this study. Following WHO recommended age-based dosing of DEC and height-based dosing of IVM would have resulted in 32% and 27% of individuals receiving treatment doses below those recommended by weight-based dosing for DEC and IVM, respectively. Underdosing would have been especially common in adult males, who tend to have the highest LF prevalence in many endemic areas. We used a 3-step modeling approach to develop and evaluate new dosing pole cutoffs. First, we analyzed the clinical trial data using quantile regression to predict weight from height. We then used weight predictions to develop new dosing pole cutoff values. Finally, we compared different dosing pole cutoffs and age and height-based WHO dosing recommendations to weight-based dosing. We considered hundreds of scenarios including country- and sex-specific dosing poles. A simple dosing pole with a 6-tablet maximum for both DEC and IVM reduced the underdosing rate by 30% and 21%, respectively, and was nearly as effective as more complex pole combinations for reducing underdosing. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Using a novel modeling approach, we developed a simple dosing pole that would markedly reduce underdosing for DEC and IVM in MDA programs compared to current WHO recommended height or age-based dosing. Public Library of Science 2019-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6663033/ /pubmed/31314753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007541 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Goss, Charles W.
O’Brian, Katiuscia
Dubray, Christine
Fischer, Peter U.
Hardy, Myra
Jambulingam, Purushothaman
King, Christopher L.
Laman, Moses
Lemoine, Jean Frantz
Robinson, Leanne J.
Samuela, Josaia
Subramanian, Swaminathan
Supali, Taniawati
Weil, Gary J.
Schechtman, Kenneth B.
Dosing pole recommendations for lymphatic filariasis elimination: A height-weight quantile regression modeling approach
title Dosing pole recommendations for lymphatic filariasis elimination: A height-weight quantile regression modeling approach
title_full Dosing pole recommendations for lymphatic filariasis elimination: A height-weight quantile regression modeling approach
title_fullStr Dosing pole recommendations for lymphatic filariasis elimination: A height-weight quantile regression modeling approach
title_full_unstemmed Dosing pole recommendations for lymphatic filariasis elimination: A height-weight quantile regression modeling approach
title_short Dosing pole recommendations for lymphatic filariasis elimination: A height-weight quantile regression modeling approach
title_sort dosing pole recommendations for lymphatic filariasis elimination: a height-weight quantile regression modeling approach
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6663033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31314753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007541
work_keys_str_mv AT gosscharlesw dosingpolerecommendationsforlymphaticfilariasiseliminationaheightweightquantileregressionmodelingapproach
AT obriankatiuscia dosingpolerecommendationsforlymphaticfilariasiseliminationaheightweightquantileregressionmodelingapproach
AT dubraychristine dosingpolerecommendationsforlymphaticfilariasiseliminationaheightweightquantileregressionmodelingapproach
AT fischerpeteru dosingpolerecommendationsforlymphaticfilariasiseliminationaheightweightquantileregressionmodelingapproach
AT hardymyra dosingpolerecommendationsforlymphaticfilariasiseliminationaheightweightquantileregressionmodelingapproach
AT jambulingampurushothaman dosingpolerecommendationsforlymphaticfilariasiseliminationaheightweightquantileregressionmodelingapproach
AT kingchristopherl dosingpolerecommendationsforlymphaticfilariasiseliminationaheightweightquantileregressionmodelingapproach
AT lamanmoses dosingpolerecommendationsforlymphaticfilariasiseliminationaheightweightquantileregressionmodelingapproach
AT lemoinejeanfrantz dosingpolerecommendationsforlymphaticfilariasiseliminationaheightweightquantileregressionmodelingapproach
AT robinsonleannej dosingpolerecommendationsforlymphaticfilariasiseliminationaheightweightquantileregressionmodelingapproach
AT samuelajosaia dosingpolerecommendationsforlymphaticfilariasiseliminationaheightweightquantileregressionmodelingapproach
AT subramanianswaminathan dosingpolerecommendationsforlymphaticfilariasiseliminationaheightweightquantileregressionmodelingapproach
AT supalitaniawati dosingpolerecommendationsforlymphaticfilariasiseliminationaheightweightquantileregressionmodelingapproach
AT weilgaryj dosingpolerecommendationsforlymphaticfilariasiseliminationaheightweightquantileregressionmodelingapproach
AT schechtmankennethb dosingpolerecommendationsforlymphaticfilariasiseliminationaheightweightquantileregressionmodelingapproach