Cargando…
Many ways to skin a cat: psychometric methods options illustrated
BACKGROUND: The three articles in this issue from members of the Psychometric Special Interest Group (SIG) of the International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) examine three different psychometric techniques researchers use to analyze item and scale properties of a patient-reported out...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6663956/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31359203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-019-0133-2 |
_version_ | 1783439804640264192 |
---|---|
author | Patrick, Donald L. |
author_facet | Patrick, Donald L. |
author_sort | Patrick, Donald L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The three articles in this issue from members of the Psychometric Special Interest Group (SIG) of the International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) examine three different psychometric techniques researchers use to analyze item and scale properties of a patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument. The articles illustrate their respective strengths and weaknesses. MAIN TEXT: Many published articles use one of the three methodologies analyzed by the authors and the reader should have a basic familiarity with the assumptions, approaches, and statistical techniques behind each analysis. These three papers shed light on some of the conundrums facing developers and users of PRO measures and data regarding what method and instruments to use. These papers have used a dataset on depressive symptoms to show that no attempt to measure such a complex feeling domain as depressed mood can cover the entire spectrum of the experience. CONCLUSIONS: As a group, these three papers will help readers evaluate published articles on instruments using one or more approaches as well as providing general education on these statistical methods in application. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6663956 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66639562019-08-12 Many ways to skin a cat: psychometric methods options illustrated Patrick, Donald L. J Patient Rep Outcomes Commentary BACKGROUND: The three articles in this issue from members of the Psychometric Special Interest Group (SIG) of the International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) examine three different psychometric techniques researchers use to analyze item and scale properties of a patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument. The articles illustrate their respective strengths and weaknesses. MAIN TEXT: Many published articles use one of the three methodologies analyzed by the authors and the reader should have a basic familiarity with the assumptions, approaches, and statistical techniques behind each analysis. These three papers shed light on some of the conundrums facing developers and users of PRO measures and data regarding what method and instruments to use. These papers have used a dataset on depressive symptoms to show that no attempt to measure such a complex feeling domain as depressed mood can cover the entire spectrum of the experience. CONCLUSIONS: As a group, these three papers will help readers evaluate published articles on instruments using one or more approaches as well as providing general education on these statistical methods in application. Springer International Publishing 2019-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6663956/ /pubmed/31359203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-019-0133-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Patrick, Donald L. Many ways to skin a cat: psychometric methods options illustrated |
title | Many ways to skin a cat: psychometric methods options illustrated |
title_full | Many ways to skin a cat: psychometric methods options illustrated |
title_fullStr | Many ways to skin a cat: psychometric methods options illustrated |
title_full_unstemmed | Many ways to skin a cat: psychometric methods options illustrated |
title_short | Many ways to skin a cat: psychometric methods options illustrated |
title_sort | many ways to skin a cat: psychometric methods options illustrated |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6663956/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31359203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-019-0133-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patrickdonaldl manywaystoskinacatpsychometricmethodsoptionsillustrated |