Cargando…

Systematic review of analytical methods applied to longitudinal studies of malaria

BACKGROUND: Modelling risk of malaria in longitudinal studies is common, because individuals are at risk for repeated infections over time. Malaria infections result in acquired immunity to clinical malaria disease. Prospective cohorts are an ideal design to relate the historical exposure to infecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stanley, Christopher C., Kazembe, Lawrence N., Mukaka, Mavuto, Otwombe, Kennedy N., Buchwald, Andrea G., Hudgens, Michael G., Mathanga, Don P., Laufer, Miriam K., Chirwa, Tobias F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6664716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31357990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-2885-9
_version_ 1783439942081314816
author Stanley, Christopher C.
Kazembe, Lawrence N.
Mukaka, Mavuto
Otwombe, Kennedy N.
Buchwald, Andrea G.
Hudgens, Michael G.
Mathanga, Don P.
Laufer, Miriam K.
Chirwa, Tobias F.
author_facet Stanley, Christopher C.
Kazembe, Lawrence N.
Mukaka, Mavuto
Otwombe, Kennedy N.
Buchwald, Andrea G.
Hudgens, Michael G.
Mathanga, Don P.
Laufer, Miriam K.
Chirwa, Tobias F.
author_sort Stanley, Christopher C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Modelling risk of malaria in longitudinal studies is common, because individuals are at risk for repeated infections over time. Malaria infections result in acquired immunity to clinical malaria disease. Prospective cohorts are an ideal design to relate the historical exposure to infection and development of clinical malaria over time, and analysis methods should consider the longitudinal nature of the data. Models must take into account the acquisition of immunity to disease that increases with each infection and the heterogeneous exposure to bites from infected Anopheles mosquitoes. Methods that fail to capture these important factors in malaria risk will not accurately model risk of malaria infection or disease. METHODS: Statistical methods applied to prospective cohort studies of clinical malaria or Plasmodium falciparum infection and disease were reviewed to assess trends in usage of the appropriate statistical methods. The study was designed to test the hypothesis that studies often fail to use appropriate statistical methods but that this would improve with the recent increase in accessibility to and expertise in longitudinal data analysis. RESULTS: Of 197 articles reviewed, the most commonly reported methods included contingency tables which comprised Pearson Chi-square, Fisher exact and McNemar’s tests (n = 102, 51.8%), Student’s t-tests (n = 82, 41.6%), followed by Cox models (n = 62, 31.5%) and Kaplan–Meier estimators (n = 59, 30.0%). The longitudinal analysis methods generalized estimating equations and mixed-effects models were reported in 41 (20.8%) and 24 (12.2%) articles, respectively, and increased in use over time. A positive trend in choice of more appropriate analytical methods was identified over time. CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar study designs across the reports, the statistical methods varied substantially and often represented overly simplistic models of risk. The results underscore the need for more effort to be channelled towards adopting standardized longitudinal methods to analyse prospective cohort studies of malaria infection and disease. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12936-019-2885-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6664716
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66647162019-08-05 Systematic review of analytical methods applied to longitudinal studies of malaria Stanley, Christopher C. Kazembe, Lawrence N. Mukaka, Mavuto Otwombe, Kennedy N. Buchwald, Andrea G. Hudgens, Michael G. Mathanga, Don P. Laufer, Miriam K. Chirwa, Tobias F. Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Modelling risk of malaria in longitudinal studies is common, because individuals are at risk for repeated infections over time. Malaria infections result in acquired immunity to clinical malaria disease. Prospective cohorts are an ideal design to relate the historical exposure to infection and development of clinical malaria over time, and analysis methods should consider the longitudinal nature of the data. Models must take into account the acquisition of immunity to disease that increases with each infection and the heterogeneous exposure to bites from infected Anopheles mosquitoes. Methods that fail to capture these important factors in malaria risk will not accurately model risk of malaria infection or disease. METHODS: Statistical methods applied to prospective cohort studies of clinical malaria or Plasmodium falciparum infection and disease were reviewed to assess trends in usage of the appropriate statistical methods. The study was designed to test the hypothesis that studies often fail to use appropriate statistical methods but that this would improve with the recent increase in accessibility to and expertise in longitudinal data analysis. RESULTS: Of 197 articles reviewed, the most commonly reported methods included contingency tables which comprised Pearson Chi-square, Fisher exact and McNemar’s tests (n = 102, 51.8%), Student’s t-tests (n = 82, 41.6%), followed by Cox models (n = 62, 31.5%) and Kaplan–Meier estimators (n = 59, 30.0%). The longitudinal analysis methods generalized estimating equations and mixed-effects models were reported in 41 (20.8%) and 24 (12.2%) articles, respectively, and increased in use over time. A positive trend in choice of more appropriate analytical methods was identified over time. CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar study designs across the reports, the statistical methods varied substantially and often represented overly simplistic models of risk. The results underscore the need for more effort to be channelled towards adopting standardized longitudinal methods to analyse prospective cohort studies of malaria infection and disease. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12936-019-2885-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6664716/ /pubmed/31357990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-2885-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Stanley, Christopher C.
Kazembe, Lawrence N.
Mukaka, Mavuto
Otwombe, Kennedy N.
Buchwald, Andrea G.
Hudgens, Michael G.
Mathanga, Don P.
Laufer, Miriam K.
Chirwa, Tobias F.
Systematic review of analytical methods applied to longitudinal studies of malaria
title Systematic review of analytical methods applied to longitudinal studies of malaria
title_full Systematic review of analytical methods applied to longitudinal studies of malaria
title_fullStr Systematic review of analytical methods applied to longitudinal studies of malaria
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of analytical methods applied to longitudinal studies of malaria
title_short Systematic review of analytical methods applied to longitudinal studies of malaria
title_sort systematic review of analytical methods applied to longitudinal studies of malaria
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6664716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31357990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-2885-9
work_keys_str_mv AT stanleychristopherc systematicreviewofanalyticalmethodsappliedtolongitudinalstudiesofmalaria
AT kazembelawrencen systematicreviewofanalyticalmethodsappliedtolongitudinalstudiesofmalaria
AT mukakamavuto systematicreviewofanalyticalmethodsappliedtolongitudinalstudiesofmalaria
AT otwombekennedyn systematicreviewofanalyticalmethodsappliedtolongitudinalstudiesofmalaria
AT buchwaldandreag systematicreviewofanalyticalmethodsappliedtolongitudinalstudiesofmalaria
AT hudgensmichaelg systematicreviewofanalyticalmethodsappliedtolongitudinalstudiesofmalaria
AT mathangadonp systematicreviewofanalyticalmethodsappliedtolongitudinalstudiesofmalaria
AT laufermiriamk systematicreviewofanalyticalmethodsappliedtolongitudinalstudiesofmalaria
AT chirwatobiasf systematicreviewofanalyticalmethodsappliedtolongitudinalstudiesofmalaria