Cargando…

Assessment of carotid artery ultrasonography in the presence of an acoustic shadow artifact

BACKGROUND: B-mode and Color Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS) are the methods of choice for screening and determining the degree of Carotid artery stenosis. The evaluation of stenosis with calcification may be hampered by a common CDUS artifact known as acoustic shadow (AS). Our objective was to asses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seyman, Estelle E., Bornstein, Natan, Auriel, Eitan, Cohen, Oren, Nissel, Tania, Hallevi, Hen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6664737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31357950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-019-1405-4
_version_ 1783439947074633728
author Seyman, Estelle E.
Bornstein, Natan
Auriel, Eitan
Cohen, Oren
Nissel, Tania
Hallevi, Hen
author_facet Seyman, Estelle E.
Bornstein, Natan
Auriel, Eitan
Cohen, Oren
Nissel, Tania
Hallevi, Hen
author_sort Seyman, Estelle E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: B-mode and Color Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS) are the methods of choice for screening and determining the degree of Carotid artery stenosis. The evaluation of stenosis with calcification may be hampered by a common CDUS artifact known as acoustic shadow (AS). Our objective was to assess the change in reliability of CDUS readings in the presence of an AS artifact. METHODS: Single center retrospective observational study. Included were patients with either an AS artifact or high-grade stenosis (defined by peak systolic velocity (PSV) > 240 cm/s) demonstrated in CDUS, and had a CT angiography (CTA) done within 6 months of the sonographic exam. All subjects were identified through the Tel-Aviv Sorasky medical center (TASMC) CDUS unit registry from which clinical information was extracted. CDUS images were manually reviewed grading AS magnitude. All CTAs were reviewed and reconstructed for accurate assessment of percent stenosis and were used as gold standard. RESULTS: The study cohort included 227 consecutive patients (corresponding with 454 internal carotid arteries) meeting inclusion criteria. 43.2% of the arteries (n = 195) had an AS artifact present on CDUS, regardless of percent stenosis, with a large artifact present in 6.7% arteries (n = 30). Older age was significantly related to the presence of AS artifact (p < 0.001). In the study cohort as a whole there was a strong correlation between percent stenosis on CTA and PSV values (Pearson’s r 0.672, p < 0.001) regardless of AS existence. The CDUS sensitivity and specificity for predicting severe stenosis were 82 and 73% respectively. The presence of a small AS slightly diminished the correlation between CDUS and CTA results without compromising CDUS reliability. A large AS severely affected the correlation between CDUS and CTA exams (Pearson’s r = 0.24, p = 0.27) and reduced CDUS reliability with a sensitivity and specificity of 62%. CONCLUSION: The presence of a large AS severely degrades the accuracy of the routine CDUS measurements. In these cases, the patient should be referred to a CDUS exam including doppler-measurement of periorbital arteries and intracranial arteries in addition to other imaging modalities such as CTA or MRA in order to assess future stroke risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6664737
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66647372019-08-05 Assessment of carotid artery ultrasonography in the presence of an acoustic shadow artifact Seyman, Estelle E. Bornstein, Natan Auriel, Eitan Cohen, Oren Nissel, Tania Hallevi, Hen BMC Neurol Research Article BACKGROUND: B-mode and Color Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS) are the methods of choice for screening and determining the degree of Carotid artery stenosis. The evaluation of stenosis with calcification may be hampered by a common CDUS artifact known as acoustic shadow (AS). Our objective was to assess the change in reliability of CDUS readings in the presence of an AS artifact. METHODS: Single center retrospective observational study. Included were patients with either an AS artifact or high-grade stenosis (defined by peak systolic velocity (PSV) > 240 cm/s) demonstrated in CDUS, and had a CT angiography (CTA) done within 6 months of the sonographic exam. All subjects were identified through the Tel-Aviv Sorasky medical center (TASMC) CDUS unit registry from which clinical information was extracted. CDUS images were manually reviewed grading AS magnitude. All CTAs were reviewed and reconstructed for accurate assessment of percent stenosis and were used as gold standard. RESULTS: The study cohort included 227 consecutive patients (corresponding with 454 internal carotid arteries) meeting inclusion criteria. 43.2% of the arteries (n = 195) had an AS artifact present on CDUS, regardless of percent stenosis, with a large artifact present in 6.7% arteries (n = 30). Older age was significantly related to the presence of AS artifact (p < 0.001). In the study cohort as a whole there was a strong correlation between percent stenosis on CTA and PSV values (Pearson’s r 0.672, p < 0.001) regardless of AS existence. The CDUS sensitivity and specificity for predicting severe stenosis were 82 and 73% respectively. The presence of a small AS slightly diminished the correlation between CDUS and CTA results without compromising CDUS reliability. A large AS severely affected the correlation between CDUS and CTA exams (Pearson’s r = 0.24, p = 0.27) and reduced CDUS reliability with a sensitivity and specificity of 62%. CONCLUSION: The presence of a large AS severely degrades the accuracy of the routine CDUS measurements. In these cases, the patient should be referred to a CDUS exam including doppler-measurement of periorbital arteries and intracranial arteries in addition to other imaging modalities such as CTA or MRA in order to assess future stroke risk. BioMed Central 2019-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6664737/ /pubmed/31357950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-019-1405-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Seyman, Estelle E.
Bornstein, Natan
Auriel, Eitan
Cohen, Oren
Nissel, Tania
Hallevi, Hen
Assessment of carotid artery ultrasonography in the presence of an acoustic shadow artifact
title Assessment of carotid artery ultrasonography in the presence of an acoustic shadow artifact
title_full Assessment of carotid artery ultrasonography in the presence of an acoustic shadow artifact
title_fullStr Assessment of carotid artery ultrasonography in the presence of an acoustic shadow artifact
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of carotid artery ultrasonography in the presence of an acoustic shadow artifact
title_short Assessment of carotid artery ultrasonography in the presence of an acoustic shadow artifact
title_sort assessment of carotid artery ultrasonography in the presence of an acoustic shadow artifact
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6664737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31357950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-019-1405-4
work_keys_str_mv AT seymanestellee assessmentofcarotidarteryultrasonographyinthepresenceofanacousticshadowartifact
AT bornsteinnatan assessmentofcarotidarteryultrasonographyinthepresenceofanacousticshadowartifact
AT aurieleitan assessmentofcarotidarteryultrasonographyinthepresenceofanacousticshadowartifact
AT cohenoren assessmentofcarotidarteryultrasonographyinthepresenceofanacousticshadowartifact
AT nisseltania assessmentofcarotidarteryultrasonographyinthepresenceofanacousticshadowartifact
AT hallevihen assessmentofcarotidarteryultrasonographyinthepresenceofanacousticshadowartifact