Cargando…

Evaluation of a community of practice for speech-language pathologists in aphasia rehabilitation: a logic analysis

BACKGROUND: Aphasia is a communication disorder affecting participation. Although there are evidence-based practice recommendations about participation and aphasia rehabilitation, it may be challenging for speech-language pathologists to ensure that rehabilitation activities have an impact on the pe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alary Gauvreau, Christine, Le Dorze, Guylaine, Kairy, Dahlia, Croteau, Claire
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6664764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31358002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4338-0
_version_ 1783439953395449856
author Alary Gauvreau, Christine
Le Dorze, Guylaine
Kairy, Dahlia
Croteau, Claire
author_facet Alary Gauvreau, Christine
Le Dorze, Guylaine
Kairy, Dahlia
Croteau, Claire
author_sort Alary Gauvreau, Christine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Aphasia is a communication disorder affecting participation. Although there are evidence-based practice recommendations about participation and aphasia rehabilitation, it may be challenging for speech-language pathologists to ensure that rehabilitation activities have an impact on the person’s participation, in part due to time limitations. Participation remains limited after rehabilitation for persons who have aphasia. Communities of practice (CoPs) are a collaborative knowledge transfer strategy that can be used for evidence-based practice implementation. The aim of this study was to describe the components and evaluate a CoP for speech-language pathologists about participation and aphasia rehabilitation. METHODS: Logic analysis was used to determine the adequacy between resources, implemented activities, outputs and short-term outcomes of the CoP. Qualitative and quantitative descriptive data were collected through observation and participants’ logbooks. Outputs and outcomes of the CoP were revealed through thematic analysis and interpretation of descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Resources including CoP design and educational aims, human and material resources were combined to create various web-based, online and offline activities. Participants invested more time per week than expected in the CoP, shared and created clinical tools and appreciated the array of suggested activities. Participant engagement allowed them to reflect, interact and collaborate with each other. All 13 participants reported they acquired knowledge about clinical tools and 12 mentioned they reflected on their practice. While the CoP was ongoing, six participants noticed evidence-practice gaps, seven prepared to change their practice, and three changed their practice towards including more participation-based considerations. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that speech-language pathologists can include more participation-based approaches in aphasia rehabilitation as a result of participating in a time-bound, web-based CoP. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-4338-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6664764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66647642019-08-05 Evaluation of a community of practice for speech-language pathologists in aphasia rehabilitation: a logic analysis Alary Gauvreau, Christine Le Dorze, Guylaine Kairy, Dahlia Croteau, Claire BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Aphasia is a communication disorder affecting participation. Although there are evidence-based practice recommendations about participation and aphasia rehabilitation, it may be challenging for speech-language pathologists to ensure that rehabilitation activities have an impact on the person’s participation, in part due to time limitations. Participation remains limited after rehabilitation for persons who have aphasia. Communities of practice (CoPs) are a collaborative knowledge transfer strategy that can be used for evidence-based practice implementation. The aim of this study was to describe the components and evaluate a CoP for speech-language pathologists about participation and aphasia rehabilitation. METHODS: Logic analysis was used to determine the adequacy between resources, implemented activities, outputs and short-term outcomes of the CoP. Qualitative and quantitative descriptive data were collected through observation and participants’ logbooks. Outputs and outcomes of the CoP were revealed through thematic analysis and interpretation of descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Resources including CoP design and educational aims, human and material resources were combined to create various web-based, online and offline activities. Participants invested more time per week than expected in the CoP, shared and created clinical tools and appreciated the array of suggested activities. Participant engagement allowed them to reflect, interact and collaborate with each other. All 13 participants reported they acquired knowledge about clinical tools and 12 mentioned they reflected on their practice. While the CoP was ongoing, six participants noticed evidence-practice gaps, seven prepared to change their practice, and three changed their practice towards including more participation-based considerations. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that speech-language pathologists can include more participation-based approaches in aphasia rehabilitation as a result of participating in a time-bound, web-based CoP. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-4338-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6664764/ /pubmed/31358002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4338-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Alary Gauvreau, Christine
Le Dorze, Guylaine
Kairy, Dahlia
Croteau, Claire
Evaluation of a community of practice for speech-language pathologists in aphasia rehabilitation: a logic analysis
title Evaluation of a community of practice for speech-language pathologists in aphasia rehabilitation: a logic analysis
title_full Evaluation of a community of practice for speech-language pathologists in aphasia rehabilitation: a logic analysis
title_fullStr Evaluation of a community of practice for speech-language pathologists in aphasia rehabilitation: a logic analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a community of practice for speech-language pathologists in aphasia rehabilitation: a logic analysis
title_short Evaluation of a community of practice for speech-language pathologists in aphasia rehabilitation: a logic analysis
title_sort evaluation of a community of practice for speech-language pathologists in aphasia rehabilitation: a logic analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6664764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31358002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4338-0
work_keys_str_mv AT alarygauvreauchristine evaluationofacommunityofpracticeforspeechlanguagepathologistsinaphasiarehabilitationalogicanalysis
AT ledorzeguylaine evaluationofacommunityofpracticeforspeechlanguagepathologistsinaphasiarehabilitationalogicanalysis
AT kairydahlia evaluationofacommunityofpracticeforspeechlanguagepathologistsinaphasiarehabilitationalogicanalysis
AT croteauclaire evaluationofacommunityofpracticeforspeechlanguagepathologistsinaphasiarehabilitationalogicanalysis