Cargando…

Physician engagement: a concept analysis

The term “physician engagement” is used quite frequently, yet it remains poorly defined and measured. The aim of this study is to clarify the term “physician engagement.” This study used an eight step-method for conducting concept analyses created by Walker and Avant. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perreira, Tyrone A, Perrier, Laure, Prokopy, Melissa, Neves-Mera, Lina, Persaud, D David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6666374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31440112
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S214765
_version_ 1783439979987337216
author Perreira, Tyrone A
Perrier, Laure
Prokopy, Melissa
Neves-Mera, Lina
Persaud, D David
author_facet Perreira, Tyrone A
Perrier, Laure
Prokopy, Melissa
Neves-Mera, Lina
Persaud, D David
author_sort Perreira, Tyrone A
collection PubMed
description The term “physician engagement” is used quite frequently, yet it remains poorly defined and measured. The aim of this study is to clarify the term “physician engagement.” This study used an eight step-method for conducting concept analyses created by Walker and Avant. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched on February 14, 2019. No limitations were put on the searches with regard to year or language. Results identify that the term “physician engagement” is regular participation of physicians in (1) deciding how their work is done, (2) making suggestions for improvement, (3) goal setting, (4) planning, and (5) monitoring of their performance in activities targeted at the micro (patient), meso (organization), and/or macro (health system) levels. The antecedents of “physician engagement” include accountability, communication, incentives, interpersonal relations, and opportunity. The results include improved outcomes such as data quality, efficiency, innovation, job satisfaction, patient satisfaction, and performance. Defining physician engagement enables physicians and health care administrators to better appreciate and more accurately measure engagement and understand how to better engage physicians.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6666374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66663742019-08-22 Physician engagement: a concept analysis Perreira, Tyrone A Perrier, Laure Prokopy, Melissa Neves-Mera, Lina Persaud, D David J Healthc Leadersh Review The term “physician engagement” is used quite frequently, yet it remains poorly defined and measured. The aim of this study is to clarify the term “physician engagement.” This study used an eight step-method for conducting concept analyses created by Walker and Avant. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched on February 14, 2019. No limitations were put on the searches with regard to year or language. Results identify that the term “physician engagement” is regular participation of physicians in (1) deciding how their work is done, (2) making suggestions for improvement, (3) goal setting, (4) planning, and (5) monitoring of their performance in activities targeted at the micro (patient), meso (organization), and/or macro (health system) levels. The antecedents of “physician engagement” include accountability, communication, incentives, interpersonal relations, and opportunity. The results include improved outcomes such as data quality, efficiency, innovation, job satisfaction, patient satisfaction, and performance. Defining physician engagement enables physicians and health care administrators to better appreciate and more accurately measure engagement and understand how to better engage physicians. Dove 2019-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6666374/ /pubmed/31440112 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S214765 Text en © 2019 Perreira et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Perreira, Tyrone A
Perrier, Laure
Prokopy, Melissa
Neves-Mera, Lina
Persaud, D David
Physician engagement: a concept analysis
title Physician engagement: a concept analysis
title_full Physician engagement: a concept analysis
title_fullStr Physician engagement: a concept analysis
title_full_unstemmed Physician engagement: a concept analysis
title_short Physician engagement: a concept analysis
title_sort physician engagement: a concept analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6666374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31440112
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S214765
work_keys_str_mv AT perreiratyronea physicianengagementaconceptanalysis
AT perrierlaure physicianengagementaconceptanalysis
AT prokopymelissa physicianengagementaconceptanalysis
AT nevesmeralina physicianengagementaconceptanalysis
AT persaudddavid physicianengagementaconceptanalysis