Cargando…

Responding to epidemics in large-scale humanitarian crises: a case study of the cholera response in Yemen, 2016–2018

BACKGROUND: Large epidemics frequently emerge in conflict-affected states. We examined the cholera response during the humanitarian crisis in Yemen to inform control strategies. METHODS: We conducted interviews with practitioners and advisors on preparedness; surveillance; laboratory; case managemen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spiegel, Paul, Ratnayake, Ruwan, Hellman, Nora, Ververs, Mija, Ngwa, Moise, Wise, Paul H, Lantagne, Daniele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6666825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31406596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001709
_version_ 1783439987044253696
author Spiegel, Paul
Ratnayake, Ruwan
Hellman, Nora
Ververs, Mija
Ngwa, Moise
Wise, Paul H
Lantagne, Daniele
author_facet Spiegel, Paul
Ratnayake, Ruwan
Hellman, Nora
Ververs, Mija
Ngwa, Moise
Wise, Paul H
Lantagne, Daniele
author_sort Spiegel, Paul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Large epidemics frequently emerge in conflict-affected states. We examined the cholera response during the humanitarian crisis in Yemen to inform control strategies. METHODS: We conducted interviews with practitioners and advisors on preparedness; surveillance; laboratory; case management; malnutrition; water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH); vaccination; coordination and insecurity. We undertook a literature review of global and Yemen-specific cholera guidance, examined surveillance data from the first and second waves (28 September 2016–12 March 2018) and reviewed reports on airstrikes on water systems and health facilities (April 2015–December 2017). We used the Global Task Force on Cholera Control’s framework to examine intervention strategies and thematic analysis to understand decision making. RESULTS: Yemen is water scarce, and repeated airstrikes damaged water systems, risking widespread infection. Since a cholera preparedness and response plan was absent, on detection, the humanitarian cluster system rapidly developed response plans. The initial plans did not prioritise key actions including community-directed WASH to reduce transmission, epidemiological analysis and laboratory monitoring. Coordination was not harmonised across the crisis-focused clusters and epidemic-focused incident management system. The health strategy was crisis focused and was centralised on functional health facilities, underemphasising less accessible areas. As vaccination was not incorporated into preparedness, consensus on its use remained slow. At the second wave peak, key actions including data management, community-directed WASH and oral rehydration and vaccination were scaled-up. CONCLUSION: Despite endemicity and conflict, Yemen was not prepared for the epidemic. To contain outbreaks, conflict-affected states, humanitarian agencies, and donors must emphasise preparedness planning and community-directed responses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6666825
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66668252019-08-12 Responding to epidemics in large-scale humanitarian crises: a case study of the cholera response in Yemen, 2016–2018 Spiegel, Paul Ratnayake, Ruwan Hellman, Nora Ververs, Mija Ngwa, Moise Wise, Paul H Lantagne, Daniele BMJ Glob Health Research BACKGROUND: Large epidemics frequently emerge in conflict-affected states. We examined the cholera response during the humanitarian crisis in Yemen to inform control strategies. METHODS: We conducted interviews with practitioners and advisors on preparedness; surveillance; laboratory; case management; malnutrition; water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH); vaccination; coordination and insecurity. We undertook a literature review of global and Yemen-specific cholera guidance, examined surveillance data from the first and second waves (28 September 2016–12 March 2018) and reviewed reports on airstrikes on water systems and health facilities (April 2015–December 2017). We used the Global Task Force on Cholera Control’s framework to examine intervention strategies and thematic analysis to understand decision making. RESULTS: Yemen is water scarce, and repeated airstrikes damaged water systems, risking widespread infection. Since a cholera preparedness and response plan was absent, on detection, the humanitarian cluster system rapidly developed response plans. The initial plans did not prioritise key actions including community-directed WASH to reduce transmission, epidemiological analysis and laboratory monitoring. Coordination was not harmonised across the crisis-focused clusters and epidemic-focused incident management system. The health strategy was crisis focused and was centralised on functional health facilities, underemphasising less accessible areas. As vaccination was not incorporated into preparedness, consensus on its use remained slow. At the second wave peak, key actions including data management, community-directed WASH and oral rehydration and vaccination were scaled-up. CONCLUSION: Despite endemicity and conflict, Yemen was not prepared for the epidemic. To contain outbreaks, conflict-affected states, humanitarian agencies, and donors must emphasise preparedness planning and community-directed responses. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6666825/ /pubmed/31406596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001709 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Spiegel, Paul
Ratnayake, Ruwan
Hellman, Nora
Ververs, Mija
Ngwa, Moise
Wise, Paul H
Lantagne, Daniele
Responding to epidemics in large-scale humanitarian crises: a case study of the cholera response in Yemen, 2016–2018
title Responding to epidemics in large-scale humanitarian crises: a case study of the cholera response in Yemen, 2016–2018
title_full Responding to epidemics in large-scale humanitarian crises: a case study of the cholera response in Yemen, 2016–2018
title_fullStr Responding to epidemics in large-scale humanitarian crises: a case study of the cholera response in Yemen, 2016–2018
title_full_unstemmed Responding to epidemics in large-scale humanitarian crises: a case study of the cholera response in Yemen, 2016–2018
title_short Responding to epidemics in large-scale humanitarian crises: a case study of the cholera response in Yemen, 2016–2018
title_sort responding to epidemics in large-scale humanitarian crises: a case study of the cholera response in yemen, 2016–2018
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6666825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31406596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001709
work_keys_str_mv AT spiegelpaul respondingtoepidemicsinlargescalehumanitariancrisesacasestudyofthecholeraresponseinyemen20162018
AT ratnayakeruwan respondingtoepidemicsinlargescalehumanitariancrisesacasestudyofthecholeraresponseinyemen20162018
AT hellmannora respondingtoepidemicsinlargescalehumanitariancrisesacasestudyofthecholeraresponseinyemen20162018
AT verversmija respondingtoepidemicsinlargescalehumanitariancrisesacasestudyofthecholeraresponseinyemen20162018
AT ngwamoise respondingtoepidemicsinlargescalehumanitariancrisesacasestudyofthecholeraresponseinyemen20162018
AT wisepaulh respondingtoepidemicsinlargescalehumanitariancrisesacasestudyofthecholeraresponseinyemen20162018
AT lantagnedaniele respondingtoepidemicsinlargescalehumanitariancrisesacasestudyofthecholeraresponseinyemen20162018