Cargando…
Immediate dental implants placed into infected sites present a higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites: Systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Alveolar infection is known as a risk factor for implant failure. Current meta-analysis on the theme could not prove statistically that immediate dental implants placed into infected sites have a higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites. The pu...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medicina Oral S.L.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6667019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31232386 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.22954 |
_version_ | 1783439998582784000 |
---|---|
author | de Oliveira-Neto, Olavo-Barbosa Lemos, Cleidiel-Aparecido-Araújo Barbosa, Fabiano-Timbó de Sousa-Rodrigues, Célio-Fernando Camello de Lima, Fernando-José |
author_facet | de Oliveira-Neto, Olavo-Barbosa Lemos, Cleidiel-Aparecido-Araújo Barbosa, Fabiano-Timbó de Sousa-Rodrigues, Célio-Fernando Camello de Lima, Fernando-José |
author_sort | de Oliveira-Neto, Olavo-Barbosa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Alveolar infection is known as a risk factor for implant failure. Current meta-analysis on the theme could not prove statistically that immediate dental implants placed into infected sites have a higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine the effectiveness of immediate dental implants placed into infected versus non-infected sites. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seven databases were sought by two reviewers. Randomized or non-randomized clinical trials that compared the placement of dental implants into infected versus non-infected sites were eligible for the study. Exclusion criteria were: papers in which the survival rate was not the primary outcome; papers without a control group; studies with less than one year of follow-up; studies whose patients did not receive antibiotic therapy; studies with medically compromised patients; duplicated papers. Risk of bias assessment was performed with the Cochrane Collaboration tool. RESULTS: Of the 3.253 initial hits, 8 studies were included in both qualitative and quantitative synthesis (kappa=0.90; very good agreement). Forest plot for implant failure showed that immediate implants placed into infected sites presented a statistically significant risk of failure that is almost 3 times higher than when placed into non-infected sites (risk ratio= 2.99; 95% confidence interval: 1.04, 8.56; p= 0.04; 935 implants; i2= 0%). Peri-implant outcomes showed no statistical difference. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate dental implants placed into infected sites presented a statistically significant higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites. Peri-implant outcomes were not statistically affected in this intervention. Key words:Dental implants, infection, tooth socket, systematic review, immediate placement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6667019 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Medicina Oral S.L. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66670192019-08-02 Immediate dental implants placed into infected sites present a higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites: Systematic review and meta-analysis de Oliveira-Neto, Olavo-Barbosa Lemos, Cleidiel-Aparecido-Araújo Barbosa, Fabiano-Timbó de Sousa-Rodrigues, Célio-Fernando Camello de Lima, Fernando-José Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Review BACKGROUND: Alveolar infection is known as a risk factor for implant failure. Current meta-analysis on the theme could not prove statistically that immediate dental implants placed into infected sites have a higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine the effectiveness of immediate dental implants placed into infected versus non-infected sites. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seven databases were sought by two reviewers. Randomized or non-randomized clinical trials that compared the placement of dental implants into infected versus non-infected sites were eligible for the study. Exclusion criteria were: papers in which the survival rate was not the primary outcome; papers without a control group; studies with less than one year of follow-up; studies whose patients did not receive antibiotic therapy; studies with medically compromised patients; duplicated papers. Risk of bias assessment was performed with the Cochrane Collaboration tool. RESULTS: Of the 3.253 initial hits, 8 studies were included in both qualitative and quantitative synthesis (kappa=0.90; very good agreement). Forest plot for implant failure showed that immediate implants placed into infected sites presented a statistically significant risk of failure that is almost 3 times higher than when placed into non-infected sites (risk ratio= 2.99; 95% confidence interval: 1.04, 8.56; p= 0.04; 935 implants; i2= 0%). Peri-implant outcomes showed no statistical difference. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate dental implants placed into infected sites presented a statistically significant higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites. Peri-implant outcomes were not statistically affected in this intervention. Key words:Dental implants, infection, tooth socket, systematic review, immediate placement. Medicina Oral S.L. 2019-07 2019-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6667019/ /pubmed/31232386 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.22954 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review de Oliveira-Neto, Olavo-Barbosa Lemos, Cleidiel-Aparecido-Araújo Barbosa, Fabiano-Timbó de Sousa-Rodrigues, Célio-Fernando Camello de Lima, Fernando-José Immediate dental implants placed into infected sites present a higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites: Systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Immediate dental implants placed into infected sites present a higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites: Systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Immediate dental implants placed into infected sites present a higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites: Systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Immediate dental implants placed into infected sites present a higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites: Systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Immediate dental implants placed into infected sites present a higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites: Systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Immediate dental implants placed into infected sites present a higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites: Systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | immediate dental implants placed into infected sites present a higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites: systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6667019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31232386 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.22954 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deoliveiranetoolavobarbosa immediatedentalimplantsplacedintoinfectedsitespresentahigherriskoffailurethanimmediatedentalimplantsplacedintononinfectedsitessystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lemoscleidielaparecidoaraujo immediatedentalimplantsplacedintoinfectedsitespresentahigherriskoffailurethanimmediatedentalimplantsplacedintononinfectedsitessystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT barbosafabianotimbo immediatedentalimplantsplacedintoinfectedsitespresentahigherriskoffailurethanimmediatedentalimplantsplacedintononinfectedsitessystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT desousarodriguesceliofernando immediatedentalimplantsplacedintoinfectedsitespresentahigherriskoffailurethanimmediatedentalimplantsplacedintononinfectedsitessystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT camellodelimafernandojose immediatedentalimplantsplacedintoinfectedsitespresentahigherriskoffailurethanimmediatedentalimplantsplacedintononinfectedsitessystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |