Cargando…

Immediate dental implants placed into infected sites present a higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Alveolar infection is known as a risk factor for implant failure. Current meta-analysis on the theme could not prove statistically that immediate dental implants placed into infected sites have a higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites. The pu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Oliveira-Neto, Olavo-Barbosa, Lemos, Cleidiel-Aparecido-Araújo, Barbosa, Fabiano-Timbó, de Sousa-Rodrigues, Célio-Fernando, Camello de Lima, Fernando-José
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6667019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31232386
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.22954
_version_ 1783439998582784000
author de Oliveira-Neto, Olavo-Barbosa
Lemos, Cleidiel-Aparecido-Araújo
Barbosa, Fabiano-Timbó
de Sousa-Rodrigues, Célio-Fernando
Camello de Lima, Fernando-José
author_facet de Oliveira-Neto, Olavo-Barbosa
Lemos, Cleidiel-Aparecido-Araújo
Barbosa, Fabiano-Timbó
de Sousa-Rodrigues, Célio-Fernando
Camello de Lima, Fernando-José
author_sort de Oliveira-Neto, Olavo-Barbosa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Alveolar infection is known as a risk factor for implant failure. Current meta-analysis on the theme could not prove statistically that immediate dental implants placed into infected sites have a higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine the effectiveness of immediate dental implants placed into infected versus non-infected sites. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seven databases were sought by two reviewers. Randomized or non-randomized clinical trials that compared the placement of dental implants into infected versus non-infected sites were eligible for the study. Exclusion criteria were: papers in which the survival rate was not the primary outcome; papers without a control group; studies with less than one year of follow-up; studies whose patients did not receive antibiotic therapy; studies with medically compromised patients; duplicated papers. Risk of bias assessment was performed with the Cochrane Collaboration tool. RESULTS: Of the 3.253 initial hits, 8 studies were included in both qualitative and quantitative synthesis (kappa=0.90; very good agreement). Forest plot for implant failure showed that immediate implants placed into infected sites presented a statistically significant risk of failure that is almost 3 times higher than when placed into non-infected sites (risk ratio= 2.99; 95% confidence interval: 1.04, 8.56; p= 0.04; 935 implants; i2= 0%). Peri-implant outcomes showed no statistical difference. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate dental implants placed into infected sites presented a statistically significant higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites. Peri-implant outcomes were not statistically affected in this intervention. Key words:Dental implants, infection, tooth socket, systematic review, immediate placement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6667019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66670192019-08-02 Immediate dental implants placed into infected sites present a higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites: Systematic review and meta-analysis de Oliveira-Neto, Olavo-Barbosa Lemos, Cleidiel-Aparecido-Araújo Barbosa, Fabiano-Timbó de Sousa-Rodrigues, Célio-Fernando Camello de Lima, Fernando-José Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Review BACKGROUND: Alveolar infection is known as a risk factor for implant failure. Current meta-analysis on the theme could not prove statistically that immediate dental implants placed into infected sites have a higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine the effectiveness of immediate dental implants placed into infected versus non-infected sites. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seven databases were sought by two reviewers. Randomized or non-randomized clinical trials that compared the placement of dental implants into infected versus non-infected sites were eligible for the study. Exclusion criteria were: papers in which the survival rate was not the primary outcome; papers without a control group; studies with less than one year of follow-up; studies whose patients did not receive antibiotic therapy; studies with medically compromised patients; duplicated papers. Risk of bias assessment was performed with the Cochrane Collaboration tool. RESULTS: Of the 3.253 initial hits, 8 studies were included in both qualitative and quantitative synthesis (kappa=0.90; very good agreement). Forest plot for implant failure showed that immediate implants placed into infected sites presented a statistically significant risk of failure that is almost 3 times higher than when placed into non-infected sites (risk ratio= 2.99; 95% confidence interval: 1.04, 8.56; p= 0.04; 935 implants; i2= 0%). Peri-implant outcomes showed no statistical difference. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate dental implants placed into infected sites presented a statistically significant higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites. Peri-implant outcomes were not statistically affected in this intervention. Key words:Dental implants, infection, tooth socket, systematic review, immediate placement. Medicina Oral S.L. 2019-07 2019-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6667019/ /pubmed/31232386 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.22954 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
de Oliveira-Neto, Olavo-Barbosa
Lemos, Cleidiel-Aparecido-Araújo
Barbosa, Fabiano-Timbó
de Sousa-Rodrigues, Célio-Fernando
Camello de Lima, Fernando-José
Immediate dental implants placed into infected sites present a higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title Immediate dental implants placed into infected sites present a higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Immediate dental implants placed into infected sites present a higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Immediate dental implants placed into infected sites present a higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Immediate dental implants placed into infected sites present a higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Immediate dental implants placed into infected sites present a higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort immediate dental implants placed into infected sites present a higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6667019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31232386
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.22954
work_keys_str_mv AT deoliveiranetoolavobarbosa immediatedentalimplantsplacedintoinfectedsitespresentahigherriskoffailurethanimmediatedentalimplantsplacedintononinfectedsitessystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lemoscleidielaparecidoaraujo immediatedentalimplantsplacedintoinfectedsitespresentahigherriskoffailurethanimmediatedentalimplantsplacedintononinfectedsitessystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT barbosafabianotimbo immediatedentalimplantsplacedintoinfectedsitespresentahigherriskoffailurethanimmediatedentalimplantsplacedintononinfectedsitessystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT desousarodriguesceliofernando immediatedentalimplantsplacedintoinfectedsitespresentahigherriskoffailurethanimmediatedentalimplantsplacedintononinfectedsitessystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT camellodelimafernandojose immediatedentalimplantsplacedintoinfectedsitespresentahigherriskoffailurethanimmediatedentalimplantsplacedintononinfectedsitessystematicreviewandmetaanalysis