Cargando…

Competition and price among brand-name drugs in the same class: A systematic review of the evidence

BACKGROUND: Some experts have proposed combating rising drug prices by promoting brand–brand competition, a situation that is supposed to arise when multiple US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved brand-name products in the same class are indicated for the same condition. However, numerous r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sarpatwari, Ameet, DiBello, Jonathan, Zakarian, Marie, Najafzadeh, Mehdi, Kesselheim, Aaron S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6667132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31361747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002872
_version_ 1783440002394357760
author Sarpatwari, Ameet
DiBello, Jonathan
Zakarian, Marie
Najafzadeh, Mehdi
Kesselheim, Aaron S.
author_facet Sarpatwari, Ameet
DiBello, Jonathan
Zakarian, Marie
Najafzadeh, Mehdi
Kesselheim, Aaron S.
author_sort Sarpatwari, Ameet
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Some experts have proposed combating rising drug prices by promoting brand–brand competition, a situation that is supposed to arise when multiple US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved brand-name products in the same class are indicated for the same condition. However, numerous reports exist of price increases following the introduction of brand-name competition, suggesting that it may not be effective. We performed a systematic literature review of the peer-reviewed health policy and economics literature to better understand the interplay between new drug entry and intraclass drug prices. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We searched PubMed and EconLit for original studies on brand–brand competition in the US market published in English between January 1990 and April 2019. We performed a qualitative synthesis of each study’s data, recording its primary objective, methodology, and results. We found 10 empirical investigations, with 1 study each on antihypertensives, anti-infectives, central nervous system stimulants for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis, histamine-2 (H2) blockers, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors; 2 studies on cancer medications; and 2 studies on all marketed or new drugs. None of the studies reported that brand–brand competition lowers list prices of existing drugs within a class. The findings of 2 studies suggest that such competition may help restrain how new drug prices are set. Other studies found evidence that brand–brand competition was mediated by the relative quality of competing drugs and the extent to which they are marketed, with safer or more effective new drugs and greater marketing associated with higher intraclass list prices. Our investigation was limited by the studies’ use of list rather than net prices and the age of some of the data. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that policies to promote brand–brand competition in the US pharmaceutical market, such as accelerating approval of non-first-in-class drugs, will likely not result in lower drug list prices absent additional structural reforms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6667132
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66671322019-08-07 Competition and price among brand-name drugs in the same class: A systematic review of the evidence Sarpatwari, Ameet DiBello, Jonathan Zakarian, Marie Najafzadeh, Mehdi Kesselheim, Aaron S. PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Some experts have proposed combating rising drug prices by promoting brand–brand competition, a situation that is supposed to arise when multiple US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved brand-name products in the same class are indicated for the same condition. However, numerous reports exist of price increases following the introduction of brand-name competition, suggesting that it may not be effective. We performed a systematic literature review of the peer-reviewed health policy and economics literature to better understand the interplay between new drug entry and intraclass drug prices. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We searched PubMed and EconLit for original studies on brand–brand competition in the US market published in English between January 1990 and April 2019. We performed a qualitative synthesis of each study’s data, recording its primary objective, methodology, and results. We found 10 empirical investigations, with 1 study each on antihypertensives, anti-infectives, central nervous system stimulants for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis, histamine-2 (H2) blockers, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors; 2 studies on cancer medications; and 2 studies on all marketed or new drugs. None of the studies reported that brand–brand competition lowers list prices of existing drugs within a class. The findings of 2 studies suggest that such competition may help restrain how new drug prices are set. Other studies found evidence that brand–brand competition was mediated by the relative quality of competing drugs and the extent to which they are marketed, with safer or more effective new drugs and greater marketing associated with higher intraclass list prices. Our investigation was limited by the studies’ use of list rather than net prices and the age of some of the data. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that policies to promote brand–brand competition in the US pharmaceutical market, such as accelerating approval of non-first-in-class drugs, will likely not result in lower drug list prices absent additional structural reforms. Public Library of Science 2019-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6667132/ /pubmed/31361747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002872 Text en © 2019 Sarpatwari et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sarpatwari, Ameet
DiBello, Jonathan
Zakarian, Marie
Najafzadeh, Mehdi
Kesselheim, Aaron S.
Competition and price among brand-name drugs in the same class: A systematic review of the evidence
title Competition and price among brand-name drugs in the same class: A systematic review of the evidence
title_full Competition and price among brand-name drugs in the same class: A systematic review of the evidence
title_fullStr Competition and price among brand-name drugs in the same class: A systematic review of the evidence
title_full_unstemmed Competition and price among brand-name drugs in the same class: A systematic review of the evidence
title_short Competition and price among brand-name drugs in the same class: A systematic review of the evidence
title_sort competition and price among brand-name drugs in the same class: a systematic review of the evidence
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6667132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31361747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002872
work_keys_str_mv AT sarpatwariameet competitionandpriceamongbrandnamedrugsinthesameclassasystematicreviewoftheevidence
AT dibellojonathan competitionandpriceamongbrandnamedrugsinthesameclassasystematicreviewoftheevidence
AT zakarianmarie competitionandpriceamongbrandnamedrugsinthesameclassasystematicreviewoftheevidence
AT najafzadehmehdi competitionandpriceamongbrandnamedrugsinthesameclassasystematicreviewoftheevidence
AT kesselheimaarons competitionandpriceamongbrandnamedrugsinthesameclassasystematicreviewoftheevidence