Cargando…

Calibration with or without phantom for fracture risk prediction in cancer patients with femoral bone metastases using CT-based finite element models

The objective of this study was to develop a new calibration method that enables calibration of Hounsfield units (HU) to bone mineral densities (BMD) without the use of a calibration phantom for fracture risk prediction of femurs with metastases using CT-based finite element (FE) models. Fifty-seven...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eggermont, Florieke, Verdonschot, Nico, van der Linden, Yvette, Tanck, Esther
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6667162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31361790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220564
_version_ 1783440008906014720
author Eggermont, Florieke
Verdonschot, Nico
van der Linden, Yvette
Tanck, Esther
author_facet Eggermont, Florieke
Verdonschot, Nico
van der Linden, Yvette
Tanck, Esther
author_sort Eggermont, Florieke
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study was to develop a new calibration method that enables calibration of Hounsfield units (HU) to bone mineral densities (BMD) without the use of a calibration phantom for fracture risk prediction of femurs with metastases using CT-based finite element (FE) models. Fifty-seven advanced cancer patients (67 femurs with bone metastases) were CT scanned atop a separate calibration phantom using a standardized protocol. Non-linear isotropic FE models were constructed based on the phantom calibration and on two phantomless calibration methods: the “air-fat-muscle” and “non-patient-specific” calibration. For air-fat-muscle calibration, peaks for air, fat and muscle tissue were extracted from a histogram of the HU in a standardized region of interest including the patient’s right leg and surrounding air. These CT peaks were linearly fitted to reference “BMD” values of the corresponding tissues to obtain a calibration function. For non-patient-specific calibration, an average phantom calibration function was used for all patients. FE failure loads were compared between phantom and phantomless calibrations. There were no differences in failure loads between phantom and air-fat-muscle calibration (p = 0.8), whereas there was a significant difference between phantom and non-patient-specific calibration (p<0.001). Although this study was not designed to investigate this, in four patients who were scanned using an aberrant reconstruction kernel, the effect of the different kernel seemed to be smaller for the air-fat-muscle calibration compared to the non-patient-specific calibration. With the air-fat-muscle calibration, clinical implementation of the FE model as tool for fracture risk assessment will be easier from a practical and financial viewpoint, since FE models can be made using everyday clinical CT scans without the need of concurrent scanning of calibration phantoms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6667162
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66671622019-08-07 Calibration with or without phantom for fracture risk prediction in cancer patients with femoral bone metastases using CT-based finite element models Eggermont, Florieke Verdonschot, Nico van der Linden, Yvette Tanck, Esther PLoS One Research Article The objective of this study was to develop a new calibration method that enables calibration of Hounsfield units (HU) to bone mineral densities (BMD) without the use of a calibration phantom for fracture risk prediction of femurs with metastases using CT-based finite element (FE) models. Fifty-seven advanced cancer patients (67 femurs with bone metastases) were CT scanned atop a separate calibration phantom using a standardized protocol. Non-linear isotropic FE models were constructed based on the phantom calibration and on two phantomless calibration methods: the “air-fat-muscle” and “non-patient-specific” calibration. For air-fat-muscle calibration, peaks for air, fat and muscle tissue were extracted from a histogram of the HU in a standardized region of interest including the patient’s right leg and surrounding air. These CT peaks were linearly fitted to reference “BMD” values of the corresponding tissues to obtain a calibration function. For non-patient-specific calibration, an average phantom calibration function was used for all patients. FE failure loads were compared between phantom and phantomless calibrations. There were no differences in failure loads between phantom and air-fat-muscle calibration (p = 0.8), whereas there was a significant difference between phantom and non-patient-specific calibration (p<0.001). Although this study was not designed to investigate this, in four patients who were scanned using an aberrant reconstruction kernel, the effect of the different kernel seemed to be smaller for the air-fat-muscle calibration compared to the non-patient-specific calibration. With the air-fat-muscle calibration, clinical implementation of the FE model as tool for fracture risk assessment will be easier from a practical and financial viewpoint, since FE models can be made using everyday clinical CT scans without the need of concurrent scanning of calibration phantoms. Public Library of Science 2019-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6667162/ /pubmed/31361790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220564 Text en © 2019 Eggermont et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Eggermont, Florieke
Verdonschot, Nico
van der Linden, Yvette
Tanck, Esther
Calibration with or without phantom for fracture risk prediction in cancer patients with femoral bone metastases using CT-based finite element models
title Calibration with or without phantom for fracture risk prediction in cancer patients with femoral bone metastases using CT-based finite element models
title_full Calibration with or without phantom for fracture risk prediction in cancer patients with femoral bone metastases using CT-based finite element models
title_fullStr Calibration with or without phantom for fracture risk prediction in cancer patients with femoral bone metastases using CT-based finite element models
title_full_unstemmed Calibration with or without phantom for fracture risk prediction in cancer patients with femoral bone metastases using CT-based finite element models
title_short Calibration with or without phantom for fracture risk prediction in cancer patients with femoral bone metastases using CT-based finite element models
title_sort calibration with or without phantom for fracture risk prediction in cancer patients with femoral bone metastases using ct-based finite element models
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6667162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31361790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220564
work_keys_str_mv AT eggermontflorieke calibrationwithorwithoutphantomforfractureriskpredictionincancerpatientswithfemoralbonemetastasesusingctbasedfiniteelementmodels
AT verdonschotnico calibrationwithorwithoutphantomforfractureriskpredictionincancerpatientswithfemoralbonemetastasesusingctbasedfiniteelementmodels
AT vanderlindenyvette calibrationwithorwithoutphantomforfractureriskpredictionincancerpatientswithfemoralbonemetastasesusingctbasedfiniteelementmodels
AT tanckesther calibrationwithorwithoutphantomforfractureriskpredictionincancerpatientswithfemoralbonemetastasesusingctbasedfiniteelementmodels