Cargando…
Neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations in children born after dydrogesterone application in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol for IVF: a retrospective cohort study
PURPOSE: Dydrogesterone (DYG) has been demonstrated to be an alternative progestin in the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol with comparable oocyte retrieval and pregnancy outcomes. However, its safety regarding neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations is still unclear. PATIE...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6667350/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31440037 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S210228 |
_version_ | 1783440018923061248 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Jialyu Xie, Qin Lin, Jiaying Lu, Xuefeng Wang, Ningling Gao, Hongyuan Cai, Renfei Kuang, Yanping |
author_facet | Huang, Jialyu Xie, Qin Lin, Jiaying Lu, Xuefeng Wang, Ningling Gao, Hongyuan Cai, Renfei Kuang, Yanping |
author_sort | Huang, Jialyu |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Dydrogesterone (DYG) has been demonstrated to be an alternative progestin in the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol with comparable oocyte retrieval and pregnancy outcomes. However, its safety regarding neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations is still unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 3556 live-born infants after in vitro fertilization and vitrified embryo transfer cycles using the DYG + human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) protocol (n=1429) or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-agonist short protocol (n=2127) from January 2014 to December 2017. Newborn information was gathered from standardized follow-up questionnaires and/or access to medical records within 7 days after birth. Associations between ovarian stimulation protocols and outcome measures were analyzed by binary logistic regression after adjusting for confounding factors. RESULTS: In both singletons and twins, birth characteristics regarding mode of delivery, newborn gender, gestational age, birthweight, length at birth and Z-scores were comparable between the two protocols. For adverse neonatal outcomes, the two protocols showed no significant differences on the rates of low birthweight, very low birthweight, preterm birth, very preterm birth, small-for-gestational age, large-for-gestational age and early neonatal death after adjustment. Furthermore, the incidence of major congenital malformations in the DYG + hMG protocol (1.12%) was similar to that in the GnRH-agonist short protocol (1.08%), with the adjusted odds ratio of 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40–2.39) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.33–2.41) in singletons and twins, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our data suggested that compared with the conventional GnRH-agonist short protocol, application of DYG in the PPOS protocol was a safe option for the newborn population without compromising neonatal outcomes or increasing congenital malformation risks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6667350 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66673502019-08-22 Neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations in children born after dydrogesterone application in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol for IVF: a retrospective cohort study Huang, Jialyu Xie, Qin Lin, Jiaying Lu, Xuefeng Wang, Ningling Gao, Hongyuan Cai, Renfei Kuang, Yanping Drug Des Devel Ther Original Research PURPOSE: Dydrogesterone (DYG) has been demonstrated to be an alternative progestin in the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol with comparable oocyte retrieval and pregnancy outcomes. However, its safety regarding neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations is still unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 3556 live-born infants after in vitro fertilization and vitrified embryo transfer cycles using the DYG + human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) protocol (n=1429) or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-agonist short protocol (n=2127) from January 2014 to December 2017. Newborn information was gathered from standardized follow-up questionnaires and/or access to medical records within 7 days after birth. Associations between ovarian stimulation protocols and outcome measures were analyzed by binary logistic regression after adjusting for confounding factors. RESULTS: In both singletons and twins, birth characteristics regarding mode of delivery, newborn gender, gestational age, birthweight, length at birth and Z-scores were comparable between the two protocols. For adverse neonatal outcomes, the two protocols showed no significant differences on the rates of low birthweight, very low birthweight, preterm birth, very preterm birth, small-for-gestational age, large-for-gestational age and early neonatal death after adjustment. Furthermore, the incidence of major congenital malformations in the DYG + hMG protocol (1.12%) was similar to that in the GnRH-agonist short protocol (1.08%), with the adjusted odds ratio of 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40–2.39) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.33–2.41) in singletons and twins, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our data suggested that compared with the conventional GnRH-agonist short protocol, application of DYG in the PPOS protocol was a safe option for the newborn population without compromising neonatal outcomes or increasing congenital malformation risks. Dove 2019-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6667350/ /pubmed/31440037 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S210228 Text en © 2019 Huang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Huang, Jialyu Xie, Qin Lin, Jiaying Lu, Xuefeng Wang, Ningling Gao, Hongyuan Cai, Renfei Kuang, Yanping Neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations in children born after dydrogesterone application in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol for IVF: a retrospective cohort study |
title | Neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations in children born after dydrogesterone application in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol for IVF: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full | Neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations in children born after dydrogesterone application in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol for IVF: a retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations in children born after dydrogesterone application in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol for IVF: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations in children born after dydrogesterone application in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol for IVF: a retrospective cohort study |
title_short | Neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations in children born after dydrogesterone application in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol for IVF: a retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations in children born after dydrogesterone application in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol for ivf: a retrospective cohort study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6667350/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31440037 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S210228 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangjialyu neonataloutcomesandcongenitalmalformationsinchildrenbornafterdydrogesteroneapplicationinprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocolforivfaretrospectivecohortstudy AT xieqin neonataloutcomesandcongenitalmalformationsinchildrenbornafterdydrogesteroneapplicationinprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocolforivfaretrospectivecohortstudy AT linjiaying neonataloutcomesandcongenitalmalformationsinchildrenbornafterdydrogesteroneapplicationinprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocolforivfaretrospectivecohortstudy AT luxuefeng neonataloutcomesandcongenitalmalformationsinchildrenbornafterdydrogesteroneapplicationinprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocolforivfaretrospectivecohortstudy AT wangningling neonataloutcomesandcongenitalmalformationsinchildrenbornafterdydrogesteroneapplicationinprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocolforivfaretrospectivecohortstudy AT gaohongyuan neonataloutcomesandcongenitalmalformationsinchildrenbornafterdydrogesteroneapplicationinprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocolforivfaretrospectivecohortstudy AT cairenfei neonataloutcomesandcongenitalmalformationsinchildrenbornafterdydrogesteroneapplicationinprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocolforivfaretrospectivecohortstudy AT kuangyanping neonataloutcomesandcongenitalmalformationsinchildrenbornafterdydrogesteroneapplicationinprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocolforivfaretrospectivecohortstudy |