Cargando…

Neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations in children born after dydrogesterone application in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol for IVF: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE: Dydrogesterone (DYG) has been demonstrated to be an alternative progestin in the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol with comparable oocyte retrieval and pregnancy outcomes. However, its safety regarding neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations is still unclear. PATIE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Jialyu, Xie, Qin, Lin, Jiaying, Lu, Xuefeng, Wang, Ningling, Gao, Hongyuan, Cai, Renfei, Kuang, Yanping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6667350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31440037
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S210228
_version_ 1783440018923061248
author Huang, Jialyu
Xie, Qin
Lin, Jiaying
Lu, Xuefeng
Wang, Ningling
Gao, Hongyuan
Cai, Renfei
Kuang, Yanping
author_facet Huang, Jialyu
Xie, Qin
Lin, Jiaying
Lu, Xuefeng
Wang, Ningling
Gao, Hongyuan
Cai, Renfei
Kuang, Yanping
author_sort Huang, Jialyu
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Dydrogesterone (DYG) has been demonstrated to be an alternative progestin in the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol with comparable oocyte retrieval and pregnancy outcomes. However, its safety regarding neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations is still unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 3556 live-born infants after in vitro fertilization and vitrified embryo transfer cycles using the DYG + human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) protocol (n=1429) or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-agonist short protocol (n=2127) from January 2014 to December 2017. Newborn information was gathered from standardized follow-up questionnaires and/or access to medical records within 7 days after birth. Associations between ovarian stimulation protocols and outcome measures were analyzed by binary logistic regression after adjusting for confounding factors. RESULTS: In both singletons and twins, birth characteristics regarding mode of delivery, newborn gender, gestational age, birthweight, length at birth and Z-scores were comparable between the two protocols. For adverse neonatal outcomes, the two protocols showed no significant differences on the rates of low birthweight, very low birthweight, preterm birth, very preterm birth, small-for-gestational age, large-for-gestational age and early neonatal death after adjustment. Furthermore, the incidence of major congenital malformations in the DYG + hMG protocol (1.12%) was similar to that in the GnRH-agonist short protocol (1.08%), with the adjusted odds ratio of 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40–2.39) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.33–2.41) in singletons and twins, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our data suggested that compared with the conventional GnRH-agonist short protocol, application of DYG in the PPOS protocol was a safe option for the newborn population without compromising neonatal outcomes or increasing congenital malformation risks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6667350
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66673502019-08-22 Neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations in children born after dydrogesterone application in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol for IVF: a retrospective cohort study Huang, Jialyu Xie, Qin Lin, Jiaying Lu, Xuefeng Wang, Ningling Gao, Hongyuan Cai, Renfei Kuang, Yanping Drug Des Devel Ther Original Research PURPOSE: Dydrogesterone (DYG) has been demonstrated to be an alternative progestin in the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol with comparable oocyte retrieval and pregnancy outcomes. However, its safety regarding neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations is still unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 3556 live-born infants after in vitro fertilization and vitrified embryo transfer cycles using the DYG + human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) protocol (n=1429) or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-agonist short protocol (n=2127) from January 2014 to December 2017. Newborn information was gathered from standardized follow-up questionnaires and/or access to medical records within 7 days after birth. Associations between ovarian stimulation protocols and outcome measures were analyzed by binary logistic regression after adjusting for confounding factors. RESULTS: In both singletons and twins, birth characteristics regarding mode of delivery, newborn gender, gestational age, birthweight, length at birth and Z-scores were comparable between the two protocols. For adverse neonatal outcomes, the two protocols showed no significant differences on the rates of low birthweight, very low birthweight, preterm birth, very preterm birth, small-for-gestational age, large-for-gestational age and early neonatal death after adjustment. Furthermore, the incidence of major congenital malformations in the DYG + hMG protocol (1.12%) was similar to that in the GnRH-agonist short protocol (1.08%), with the adjusted odds ratio of 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40–2.39) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.33–2.41) in singletons and twins, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our data suggested that compared with the conventional GnRH-agonist short protocol, application of DYG in the PPOS protocol was a safe option for the newborn population without compromising neonatal outcomes or increasing congenital malformation risks. Dove 2019-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6667350/ /pubmed/31440037 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S210228 Text en © 2019 Huang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Huang, Jialyu
Xie, Qin
Lin, Jiaying
Lu, Xuefeng
Wang, Ningling
Gao, Hongyuan
Cai, Renfei
Kuang, Yanping
Neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations in children born after dydrogesterone application in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol for IVF: a retrospective cohort study
title Neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations in children born after dydrogesterone application in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol for IVF: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations in children born after dydrogesterone application in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol for IVF: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations in children born after dydrogesterone application in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol for IVF: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations in children born after dydrogesterone application in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol for IVF: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations in children born after dydrogesterone application in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol for IVF: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations in children born after dydrogesterone application in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol for ivf: a retrospective cohort study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6667350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31440037
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S210228
work_keys_str_mv AT huangjialyu neonataloutcomesandcongenitalmalformationsinchildrenbornafterdydrogesteroneapplicationinprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocolforivfaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT xieqin neonataloutcomesandcongenitalmalformationsinchildrenbornafterdydrogesteroneapplicationinprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocolforivfaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT linjiaying neonataloutcomesandcongenitalmalformationsinchildrenbornafterdydrogesteroneapplicationinprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocolforivfaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT luxuefeng neonataloutcomesandcongenitalmalformationsinchildrenbornafterdydrogesteroneapplicationinprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocolforivfaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT wangningling neonataloutcomesandcongenitalmalformationsinchildrenbornafterdydrogesteroneapplicationinprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocolforivfaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT gaohongyuan neonataloutcomesandcongenitalmalformationsinchildrenbornafterdydrogesteroneapplicationinprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocolforivfaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT cairenfei neonataloutcomesandcongenitalmalformationsinchildrenbornafterdydrogesteroneapplicationinprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocolforivfaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kuangyanping neonataloutcomesandcongenitalmalformationsinchildrenbornafterdydrogesteroneapplicationinprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocolforivfaretrospectivecohortstudy