Cargando…

Multicentre evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF assay in detecting urinary tract tuberculosis with urine samples

Genitourinary tuberculosis (GUTB) accounts for up to 40% of extrapulmonary tuberculosis cases. Rapid tests for GUTB are urgently needed because it is often associated with delayed health-care seeking, leading to serious consequences. This study evaluated the performance of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Yu, Wu, Peng, Fu, Liang, Liu, Yu-hong, Zhang, Yao, Zhao, Yanping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6667469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31363115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47358-3
_version_ 1783440045098663936
author Chen, Yu
Wu, Peng
Fu, Liang
Liu, Yu-hong
Zhang, Yao
Zhao, Yanping
author_facet Chen, Yu
Wu, Peng
Fu, Liang
Liu, Yu-hong
Zhang, Yao
Zhao, Yanping
author_sort Chen, Yu
collection PubMed
description Genitourinary tuberculosis (GUTB) accounts for up to 40% of extrapulmonary tuberculosis cases. Rapid tests for GUTB are urgently needed because it is often associated with delayed health-care seeking, leading to serious consequences. This study evaluated the performance of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay in the rapid diagnosis of urinary tract tuberculosis (UTB) and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis with urine specimens. In all, 302 patients were included from four hospitals in China. Suspected UTB patients were tested with Xpert, smear, and MGIT 960 culture. Drug susceptibility testing (DST) was conducted for culture-positive cases. The performance of the assays was evaluated against MGIT 960 culture and a composite reference standard (CRS). Among all participants, 150 (49.7%) had CRS-positive UTB, of whom 36 (24.0%) were culture-confirmed. Against culture, Xpert and smear achieved a sensitivity of 94.4% (95% CI: 81.3–99.3%) and 22.2% (95% CI: 10.1–39.2%), respectively. Against CRS, the sensitivity of Xpert, smear and culture was 41.3% (95% CI: 33.4–49.7%), 7.3% (95% CI: 3.7–12.7%), and 24.0% (95% CI: 17.4–31.6%). Xpert had better performance than smear and culture in detecting UTB from urine samples and could be considered for the diagnosis of UTB. Moreover, Xpert showed better performance than MGIT 960-based DST using urine culture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6667469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66674692019-08-06 Multicentre evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF assay in detecting urinary tract tuberculosis with urine samples Chen, Yu Wu, Peng Fu, Liang Liu, Yu-hong Zhang, Yao Zhao, Yanping Sci Rep Article Genitourinary tuberculosis (GUTB) accounts for up to 40% of extrapulmonary tuberculosis cases. Rapid tests for GUTB are urgently needed because it is often associated with delayed health-care seeking, leading to serious consequences. This study evaluated the performance of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay in the rapid diagnosis of urinary tract tuberculosis (UTB) and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis with urine specimens. In all, 302 patients were included from four hospitals in China. Suspected UTB patients were tested with Xpert, smear, and MGIT 960 culture. Drug susceptibility testing (DST) was conducted for culture-positive cases. The performance of the assays was evaluated against MGIT 960 culture and a composite reference standard (CRS). Among all participants, 150 (49.7%) had CRS-positive UTB, of whom 36 (24.0%) were culture-confirmed. Against culture, Xpert and smear achieved a sensitivity of 94.4% (95% CI: 81.3–99.3%) and 22.2% (95% CI: 10.1–39.2%), respectively. Against CRS, the sensitivity of Xpert, smear and culture was 41.3% (95% CI: 33.4–49.7%), 7.3% (95% CI: 3.7–12.7%), and 24.0% (95% CI: 17.4–31.6%). Xpert had better performance than smear and culture in detecting UTB from urine samples and could be considered for the diagnosis of UTB. Moreover, Xpert showed better performance than MGIT 960-based DST using urine culture. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6667469/ /pubmed/31363115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47358-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Chen, Yu
Wu, Peng
Fu, Liang
Liu, Yu-hong
Zhang, Yao
Zhao, Yanping
Multicentre evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF assay in detecting urinary tract tuberculosis with urine samples
title Multicentre evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF assay in detecting urinary tract tuberculosis with urine samples
title_full Multicentre evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF assay in detecting urinary tract tuberculosis with urine samples
title_fullStr Multicentre evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF assay in detecting urinary tract tuberculosis with urine samples
title_full_unstemmed Multicentre evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF assay in detecting urinary tract tuberculosis with urine samples
title_short Multicentre evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF assay in detecting urinary tract tuberculosis with urine samples
title_sort multicentre evaluation of xpert mtb/rif assay in detecting urinary tract tuberculosis with urine samples
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6667469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31363115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47358-3
work_keys_str_mv AT chenyu multicentreevaluationofxpertmtbrifassayindetectingurinarytracttuberculosiswithurinesamples
AT wupeng multicentreevaluationofxpertmtbrifassayindetectingurinarytracttuberculosiswithurinesamples
AT fuliang multicentreevaluationofxpertmtbrifassayindetectingurinarytracttuberculosiswithurinesamples
AT liuyuhong multicentreevaluationofxpertmtbrifassayindetectingurinarytracttuberculosiswithurinesamples
AT zhangyao multicentreevaluationofxpertmtbrifassayindetectingurinarytracttuberculosiswithurinesamples
AT zhaoyanping multicentreevaluationofxpertmtbrifassayindetectingurinarytracttuberculosiswithurinesamples