Cargando…

Clinician-patient communication during the diagnostic workup: The ABIDE project

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to describe clinician-patient communication in the diagnostic process of memory clinics, specifically clinician behavior known to facilitate knowledgeable participation of patients during consultations. METHODS: In this multicenter, observational study, we audio-recorded routi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Visser, Leonie N.C., Kunneman, Marleen, Murugesu, Laxsini, van Maurik, Ingrid, Zwan, Marissa, Bouwman, Femke H., Schuur, Jacqueline, Wind, Hilje A., Blaauw, Marjolijn S.J., Kragt, J.Jolijn, Roks, Gerwin, Boelaarts, Leo, Schipper, Annemieke C., Schooneboom, Niki, Scheltens, Philip, van der Flier, Wiesje M., Smets, Ellen M.A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6667786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31388556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2019.06.001
_version_ 1783440098644197376
author Visser, Leonie N.C.
Kunneman, Marleen
Murugesu, Laxsini
van Maurik, Ingrid
Zwan, Marissa
Bouwman, Femke H.
Schuur, Jacqueline
Wind, Hilje A.
Blaauw, Marjolijn S.J.
Kragt, J.Jolijn
Roks, Gerwin
Boelaarts, Leo
Schipper, Annemieke C.
Schooneboom, Niki
Scheltens, Philip
van der Flier, Wiesje M.
Smets, Ellen M.A.
author_facet Visser, Leonie N.C.
Kunneman, Marleen
Murugesu, Laxsini
van Maurik, Ingrid
Zwan, Marissa
Bouwman, Femke H.
Schuur, Jacqueline
Wind, Hilje A.
Blaauw, Marjolijn S.J.
Kragt, J.Jolijn
Roks, Gerwin
Boelaarts, Leo
Schipper, Annemieke C.
Schooneboom, Niki
Scheltens, Philip
van der Flier, Wiesje M.
Smets, Ellen M.A.
author_sort Visser, Leonie N.C.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: We aimed to describe clinician-patient communication in the diagnostic process of memory clinics, specifically clinician behavior known to facilitate knowledgeable participation of patients during consultations. METHODS: In this multicenter, observational study, we audio-recorded routine diagnostic consultations of 41 clinicians and 136 patients/caregivers at eight memory clinics. Patients/caregivers completed surveys after each audiotaped consultation. We used a study-specific coding scheme to categorize communication behavior. RESULTS: Clinicians often provided information on (results of) diagnostic testing. They infrequently invited questions and/or checked understanding. Clinician behavior to involve patients in decision-making about diagnostic testing was limited. Of note, patients/caregivers rarely expressed their information or involvement preferences. Yet, approximately, one quarter of them would have liked to receive more information. DISCUSSION: Involving patients more explicitly by means of shared decision-making could benefit the quality of care provided in memory clinics because it enables clinicians to attune the diagnostic workup to the individual patient's needs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6667786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66677862019-08-06 Clinician-patient communication during the diagnostic workup: The ABIDE project Visser, Leonie N.C. Kunneman, Marleen Murugesu, Laxsini van Maurik, Ingrid Zwan, Marissa Bouwman, Femke H. Schuur, Jacqueline Wind, Hilje A. Blaauw, Marjolijn S.J. Kragt, J.Jolijn Roks, Gerwin Boelaarts, Leo Schipper, Annemieke C. Schooneboom, Niki Scheltens, Philip van der Flier, Wiesje M. Smets, Ellen M.A. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) Diagnostic Assessment & Prognosis INTRODUCTION: We aimed to describe clinician-patient communication in the diagnostic process of memory clinics, specifically clinician behavior known to facilitate knowledgeable participation of patients during consultations. METHODS: In this multicenter, observational study, we audio-recorded routine diagnostic consultations of 41 clinicians and 136 patients/caregivers at eight memory clinics. Patients/caregivers completed surveys after each audiotaped consultation. We used a study-specific coding scheme to categorize communication behavior. RESULTS: Clinicians often provided information on (results of) diagnostic testing. They infrequently invited questions and/or checked understanding. Clinician behavior to involve patients in decision-making about diagnostic testing was limited. Of note, patients/caregivers rarely expressed their information or involvement preferences. Yet, approximately, one quarter of them would have liked to receive more information. DISCUSSION: Involving patients more explicitly by means of shared decision-making could benefit the quality of care provided in memory clinics because it enables clinicians to attune the diagnostic workup to the individual patient's needs. Elsevier 2019-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6667786/ /pubmed/31388556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2019.06.001 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Diagnostic Assessment & Prognosis
Visser, Leonie N.C.
Kunneman, Marleen
Murugesu, Laxsini
van Maurik, Ingrid
Zwan, Marissa
Bouwman, Femke H.
Schuur, Jacqueline
Wind, Hilje A.
Blaauw, Marjolijn S.J.
Kragt, J.Jolijn
Roks, Gerwin
Boelaarts, Leo
Schipper, Annemieke C.
Schooneboom, Niki
Scheltens, Philip
van der Flier, Wiesje M.
Smets, Ellen M.A.
Clinician-patient communication during the diagnostic workup: The ABIDE project
title Clinician-patient communication during the diagnostic workup: The ABIDE project
title_full Clinician-patient communication during the diagnostic workup: The ABIDE project
title_fullStr Clinician-patient communication during the diagnostic workup: The ABIDE project
title_full_unstemmed Clinician-patient communication during the diagnostic workup: The ABIDE project
title_short Clinician-patient communication during the diagnostic workup: The ABIDE project
title_sort clinician-patient communication during the diagnostic workup: the abide project
topic Diagnostic Assessment & Prognosis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6667786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31388556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2019.06.001
work_keys_str_mv AT visserleonienc clinicianpatientcommunicationduringthediagnosticworkuptheabideproject
AT kunnemanmarleen clinicianpatientcommunicationduringthediagnosticworkuptheabideproject
AT murugesulaxsini clinicianpatientcommunicationduringthediagnosticworkuptheabideproject
AT vanmaurikingrid clinicianpatientcommunicationduringthediagnosticworkuptheabideproject
AT zwanmarissa clinicianpatientcommunicationduringthediagnosticworkuptheabideproject
AT bouwmanfemkeh clinicianpatientcommunicationduringthediagnosticworkuptheabideproject
AT schuurjacqueline clinicianpatientcommunicationduringthediagnosticworkuptheabideproject
AT windhiljea clinicianpatientcommunicationduringthediagnosticworkuptheabideproject
AT blaauwmarjolijnsj clinicianpatientcommunicationduringthediagnosticworkuptheabideproject
AT kragtjjolijn clinicianpatientcommunicationduringthediagnosticworkuptheabideproject
AT roksgerwin clinicianpatientcommunicationduringthediagnosticworkuptheabideproject
AT boelaartsleo clinicianpatientcommunicationduringthediagnosticworkuptheabideproject
AT schipperannemiekec clinicianpatientcommunicationduringthediagnosticworkuptheabideproject
AT schooneboomniki clinicianpatientcommunicationduringthediagnosticworkuptheabideproject
AT scheltensphilip clinicianpatientcommunicationduringthediagnosticworkuptheabideproject
AT vanderflierwiesjem clinicianpatientcommunicationduringthediagnosticworkuptheabideproject
AT smetsellenma clinicianpatientcommunicationduringthediagnosticworkuptheabideproject