Cargando…
Bioequivalence Evaluation of Two Oral Formulations of Acetaminophen in Healthy Subjects: Results From a Randomized, Single‐Blind, Crossover Study
Despite widespread availability of acetaminophen in Mexico, data on its pharmacokinetic properties in Mexican populations are limited. This single‐center, single‐blind, randomized, 2‐period, 2‐treatment, crossover, single‐dose‐per‐period, 2‐sequence study evaluated the bioequivalence of a test aceta...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6667897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29749718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.469 |
_version_ | 1783440120254300160 |
---|---|
author | García Aguirre, Luis Bohorquez Nassar, Carlos Ruiz Olmedo, Isabel Dennie, Lara Medina Nolasco, Araceli G. |
author_facet | García Aguirre, Luis Bohorquez Nassar, Carlos Ruiz Olmedo, Isabel Dennie, Lara Medina Nolasco, Araceli G. |
author_sort | García Aguirre, Luis |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite widespread availability of acetaminophen in Mexico, data on its pharmacokinetic properties in Mexican populations are limited. This single‐center, single‐blind, randomized, 2‐period, 2‐treatment, crossover, single‐dose‐per‐period, 2‐sequence study evaluated the bioequivalence of a test acetaminophen product available in Mexico compared with a reference 500‐mg acetaminophen product in 28 healthy adults under fasting conditions. Blood samples were collected predose and at specified intervals across a 16‐hour period following administration and were analyzed for acetaminophen using a validated reverse‐phase high‐performance liquid chromatography method. Drug products were considered to be bioequivalent if confidence intervals of natural log‐transformed C(max), AUC(0‐t), and AUC(0‐∞) data were within the range of 80% to 125%. Results were inconclusive for C(max) due to high levels of intrasubject variability with this parameter. However, criteria for bioequivalence were met for AUC(0‐t) and AUC(0‐∞). All measured acetaminophen concentrations in this study were within a safe therapeutic range, and no adverse events were reported. The level of C(max) intrasubject variability observed in this study does not have any apparent clinical implications that could affect either safety or efficacy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6667897 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66678972019-08-06 Bioequivalence Evaluation of Two Oral Formulations of Acetaminophen in Healthy Subjects: Results From a Randomized, Single‐Blind, Crossover Study García Aguirre, Luis Bohorquez Nassar, Carlos Ruiz Olmedo, Isabel Dennie, Lara Medina Nolasco, Araceli G. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev Articles Despite widespread availability of acetaminophen in Mexico, data on its pharmacokinetic properties in Mexican populations are limited. This single‐center, single‐blind, randomized, 2‐period, 2‐treatment, crossover, single‐dose‐per‐period, 2‐sequence study evaluated the bioequivalence of a test acetaminophen product available in Mexico compared with a reference 500‐mg acetaminophen product in 28 healthy adults under fasting conditions. Blood samples were collected predose and at specified intervals across a 16‐hour period following administration and were analyzed for acetaminophen using a validated reverse‐phase high‐performance liquid chromatography method. Drug products were considered to be bioequivalent if confidence intervals of natural log‐transformed C(max), AUC(0‐t), and AUC(0‐∞) data were within the range of 80% to 125%. Results were inconclusive for C(max) due to high levels of intrasubject variability with this parameter. However, criteria for bioequivalence were met for AUC(0‐t) and AUC(0‐∞). All measured acetaminophen concentrations in this study were within a safe therapeutic range, and no adverse events were reported. The level of C(max) intrasubject variability observed in this study does not have any apparent clinical implications that could affect either safety or efficacy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-05-11 2019-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6667897/ /pubmed/29749718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.469 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Clinical Pharmacology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Articles García Aguirre, Luis Bohorquez Nassar, Carlos Ruiz Olmedo, Isabel Dennie, Lara Medina Nolasco, Araceli G. Bioequivalence Evaluation of Two Oral Formulations of Acetaminophen in Healthy Subjects: Results From a Randomized, Single‐Blind, Crossover Study |
title | Bioequivalence Evaluation of Two Oral Formulations of Acetaminophen in Healthy Subjects: Results From a Randomized, Single‐Blind, Crossover Study |
title_full | Bioequivalence Evaluation of Two Oral Formulations of Acetaminophen in Healthy Subjects: Results From a Randomized, Single‐Blind, Crossover Study |
title_fullStr | Bioequivalence Evaluation of Two Oral Formulations of Acetaminophen in Healthy Subjects: Results From a Randomized, Single‐Blind, Crossover Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Bioequivalence Evaluation of Two Oral Formulations of Acetaminophen in Healthy Subjects: Results From a Randomized, Single‐Blind, Crossover Study |
title_short | Bioequivalence Evaluation of Two Oral Formulations of Acetaminophen in Healthy Subjects: Results From a Randomized, Single‐Blind, Crossover Study |
title_sort | bioequivalence evaluation of two oral formulations of acetaminophen in healthy subjects: results from a randomized, single‐blind, crossover study |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6667897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29749718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.469 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garciaaguirreluis bioequivalenceevaluationoftwooralformulationsofacetaminopheninhealthysubjectsresultsfromarandomizedsingleblindcrossoverstudy AT bohorqueznassarcarlos bioequivalenceevaluationoftwooralformulationsofacetaminopheninhealthysubjectsresultsfromarandomizedsingleblindcrossoverstudy AT ruizolmedoisabel bioequivalenceevaluationoftwooralformulationsofacetaminopheninhealthysubjectsresultsfromarandomizedsingleblindcrossoverstudy AT dennielara bioequivalenceevaluationoftwooralformulationsofacetaminopheninhealthysubjectsresultsfromarandomizedsingleblindcrossoverstudy AT medinanolascoaracelig bioequivalenceevaluationoftwooralformulationsofacetaminopheninhealthysubjectsresultsfromarandomizedsingleblindcrossoverstudy |