Cargando…
Correction: Fractional flow reserve derived from microcatheters versus standard pressure wires: a stenosis-level meta-analysis
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6667933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31413848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2018-000971corr1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Fractional flow reserve derived from microcatheters versus standard pressure wires: a stenosis-level meta-analysis
por: Seligman, Henry, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Extent of the difference between microcatheter and pressure wire-derived fractional flow reserve and its relation to optical coherence tomography-derived parameters
por: Matsuo, Yoshiki, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Multicenter clinical evaluation of a piezoresistive‐MEMS‐sensor rapid‐exchange pressure microcatheter system for fractional flow reserve measurement
por: Li, Chenguang, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Validation of pressure gradient and peripheral fractional flow reserve measured by a pressure wire for diagnosis of iliofemoral artery disease with intermediate stenosis
por: Murata, Naotaka, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Comparison of Computed Tomography derived Fractional Flow Reserve to invasive Fractional Flow Reserve in Diagnosis of Functional Coronary Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis
por: Agasthi, Pradyumna, et al.
Publicado: (2018)