Cargando…
Comparative effect of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors versus other biological agents on cardiovascular risk-associated biomarkers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
BACKGROUND: To comparatively investigate the differential effect of second-line tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) versus other biological agents on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk-associated biomarkers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We evaluated the serum levels of li...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6667971/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31413865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2019-000897 |
_version_ | 1783440130564947968 |
---|---|
author | Virone, Alexandre Bastard, Jean-Philippe Fellahi, Soraya Capeau, Jacqueline Rouanet, Stéphanie Sibilia, Jean Ravaud, Philippe Berenbaum, Francis Gottenberg, Jacques-Eric Sellam, Jérémie |
author_facet | Virone, Alexandre Bastard, Jean-Philippe Fellahi, Soraya Capeau, Jacqueline Rouanet, Stéphanie Sibilia, Jean Ravaud, Philippe Berenbaum, Francis Gottenberg, Jacques-Eric Sellam, Jérémie |
author_sort | Virone, Alexandre |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To comparatively investigate the differential effect of second-line tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) versus other biological agents on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk-associated biomarkers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We evaluated the serum levels of lipoprotein-associated apoproteins ApoA1 and ApoB100 and lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and the leptin/adiponectin ratio (LAR) as an insulin resistance proxy in patients with RA from the Rotation Or Change (ROC) trial treated with either a second-line TNFi or another biologic (tocilizumab (TCZ), rituximab or abatacept) at baseline and week 24. We compared the changes in biomarker levels in each group and according to the EULAR response. RESULTS: Of the 300 patients enrolled in the ROC trial, 203 were included in the study, including 96 in the second-line TNFi group and 107 in the other biological group. The measured biomarkers did not deteriorate between baseline and week 24 regardless of the group. A greater improvement in the LAR was noted in the other biological group (median (IQR) −0.12 ng/µg (−0.58 to 0.31) vs 0.04 (−0.19 to 0.43), p=0.033), and a greater improvement in the Lp(a) level was observed following treatment with TCZ than with a TNFi (−0.05 g/L (−0.11 to −0.01) vs −0.01 g/L (−0.02 to 0.01), p<0.001). When considering the patients’ responses to treatment, improved biomarkers were mainly observed in the EULAR responders in each treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: TNFis and non-TNFis were neutral on improved CVD risk-associated biomarkers in patients with RA insufficiently controlled by TNFis. TCZ could be associated with a better improvement concerning Lp(a) and LAR than TNFis. This improvement could be related to a good therapeutic response, thereby supporting the need of good control of RA. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01000441, registered on 22 October 2009. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6667971 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66679712019-08-14 Comparative effect of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors versus other biological agents on cardiovascular risk-associated biomarkers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis Virone, Alexandre Bastard, Jean-Philippe Fellahi, Soraya Capeau, Jacqueline Rouanet, Stéphanie Sibilia, Jean Ravaud, Philippe Berenbaum, Francis Gottenberg, Jacques-Eric Sellam, Jérémie RMD Open Rheumatoid Arthritis BACKGROUND: To comparatively investigate the differential effect of second-line tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) versus other biological agents on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk-associated biomarkers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We evaluated the serum levels of lipoprotein-associated apoproteins ApoA1 and ApoB100 and lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and the leptin/adiponectin ratio (LAR) as an insulin resistance proxy in patients with RA from the Rotation Or Change (ROC) trial treated with either a second-line TNFi or another biologic (tocilizumab (TCZ), rituximab or abatacept) at baseline and week 24. We compared the changes in biomarker levels in each group and according to the EULAR response. RESULTS: Of the 300 patients enrolled in the ROC trial, 203 were included in the study, including 96 in the second-line TNFi group and 107 in the other biological group. The measured biomarkers did not deteriorate between baseline and week 24 regardless of the group. A greater improvement in the LAR was noted in the other biological group (median (IQR) −0.12 ng/µg (−0.58 to 0.31) vs 0.04 (−0.19 to 0.43), p=0.033), and a greater improvement in the Lp(a) level was observed following treatment with TCZ than with a TNFi (−0.05 g/L (−0.11 to −0.01) vs −0.01 g/L (−0.02 to 0.01), p<0.001). When considering the patients’ responses to treatment, improved biomarkers were mainly observed in the EULAR responders in each treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: TNFis and non-TNFis were neutral on improved CVD risk-associated biomarkers in patients with RA insufficiently controlled by TNFis. TCZ could be associated with a better improvement concerning Lp(a) and LAR than TNFis. This improvement could be related to a good therapeutic response, thereby supporting the need of good control of RA. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01000441, registered on 22 October 2009. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6667971/ /pubmed/31413865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2019-000897 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Rheumatoid Arthritis Virone, Alexandre Bastard, Jean-Philippe Fellahi, Soraya Capeau, Jacqueline Rouanet, Stéphanie Sibilia, Jean Ravaud, Philippe Berenbaum, Francis Gottenberg, Jacques-Eric Sellam, Jérémie Comparative effect of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors versus other biological agents on cardiovascular risk-associated biomarkers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title | Comparative effect of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors versus other biological agents on cardiovascular risk-associated biomarkers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title_full | Comparative effect of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors versus other biological agents on cardiovascular risk-associated biomarkers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title_fullStr | Comparative effect of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors versus other biological agents on cardiovascular risk-associated biomarkers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative effect of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors versus other biological agents on cardiovascular risk-associated biomarkers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title_short | Comparative effect of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors versus other biological agents on cardiovascular risk-associated biomarkers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title_sort | comparative effect of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors versus other biological agents on cardiovascular risk-associated biomarkers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
topic | Rheumatoid Arthritis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6667971/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31413865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2019-000897 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vironealexandre comparativeeffectoftumournecrosisfactorinhibitorsversusotherbiologicalagentsoncardiovascularriskassociatedbiomarkersinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT bastardjeanphilippe comparativeeffectoftumournecrosisfactorinhibitorsversusotherbiologicalagentsoncardiovascularriskassociatedbiomarkersinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT fellahisoraya comparativeeffectoftumournecrosisfactorinhibitorsversusotherbiologicalagentsoncardiovascularriskassociatedbiomarkersinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT capeaujacqueline comparativeeffectoftumournecrosisfactorinhibitorsversusotherbiologicalagentsoncardiovascularriskassociatedbiomarkersinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT rouanetstephanie comparativeeffectoftumournecrosisfactorinhibitorsversusotherbiologicalagentsoncardiovascularriskassociatedbiomarkersinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT sibiliajean comparativeeffectoftumournecrosisfactorinhibitorsversusotherbiologicalagentsoncardiovascularriskassociatedbiomarkersinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT ravaudphilippe comparativeeffectoftumournecrosisfactorinhibitorsversusotherbiologicalagentsoncardiovascularriskassociatedbiomarkersinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT berenbaumfrancis comparativeeffectoftumournecrosisfactorinhibitorsversusotherbiologicalagentsoncardiovascularriskassociatedbiomarkersinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT gottenbergjacqueseric comparativeeffectoftumournecrosisfactorinhibitorsversusotherbiologicalagentsoncardiovascularriskassociatedbiomarkersinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT sellamjeremie comparativeeffectoftumournecrosisfactorinhibitorsversusotherbiologicalagentsoncardiovascularriskassociatedbiomarkersinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis |