Cargando…

Advances in tumour endoprostheses: a systematic review

Tumour endoprostheses have facilitated limb-salvage procedures in primary bone and soft tissue sarcomas, and are increasingly being used in symptomatic metastases of the long bones. The objective of the present review was to analyse articles published over the last three years on tumour endoprosthes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smolle, Maria A., Andreou, Dimosthenis, Tunn, Per-Ulf, Leithner, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6667979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31423328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.180081
_version_ 1783440132455530496
author Smolle, Maria A.
Andreou, Dimosthenis
Tunn, Per-Ulf
Leithner, Andreas
author_facet Smolle, Maria A.
Andreou, Dimosthenis
Tunn, Per-Ulf
Leithner, Andreas
author_sort Smolle, Maria A.
collection PubMed
description Tumour endoprostheses have facilitated limb-salvage procedures in primary bone and soft tissue sarcomas, and are increasingly being used in symptomatic metastases of the long bones. The objective of the present review was to analyse articles published over the last three years on tumour endoprostheses and to summarize current knowledge on this topic. The NCBI PubMed webpage was used to identify original articles published between January 2015 and April 2018 in journals with an impact factor in the top 25.9% of the respective category (orthopaedics, multidisciplinary sciences). The following search-terms were used: tumour endoprosthesis, advances tumour endoprosthesis, tumour megaprosthesis, prosthetic reconstruction AND tumour. We identified 347 original articles, of which 53 complied with the abovementioned criteria. Articles were categorized into (1) tumour endoprostheses in the shoulder girdle, (2) tumour endoprostheses in the proximal femur, (3) tumour endoprostheses of the knee region, (4) tumour endoprostheses in the pelvis, (5) (expandable) prostheses in children and (6) long-term results of tumour endoprostheses. The topics of interest covered by the selected studies largely matched with the main research questions stated at a consensus meeting, with survival outcome of orthopaedic implants being the most commonly raised research question. As many studies reported on the risk of deep infections, research in the future should also focus on potential preventive methods in endoprosthetic tumour reconstruction. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:445-459. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180081
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6667979
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66679792019-08-16 Advances in tumour endoprostheses: a systematic review Smolle, Maria A. Andreou, Dimosthenis Tunn, Per-Ulf Leithner, Andreas EFORT Open Rev Oncology Tumour endoprostheses have facilitated limb-salvage procedures in primary bone and soft tissue sarcomas, and are increasingly being used in symptomatic metastases of the long bones. The objective of the present review was to analyse articles published over the last three years on tumour endoprostheses and to summarize current knowledge on this topic. The NCBI PubMed webpage was used to identify original articles published between January 2015 and April 2018 in journals with an impact factor in the top 25.9% of the respective category (orthopaedics, multidisciplinary sciences). The following search-terms were used: tumour endoprosthesis, advances tumour endoprosthesis, tumour megaprosthesis, prosthetic reconstruction AND tumour. We identified 347 original articles, of which 53 complied with the abovementioned criteria. Articles were categorized into (1) tumour endoprostheses in the shoulder girdle, (2) tumour endoprostheses in the proximal femur, (3) tumour endoprostheses of the knee region, (4) tumour endoprostheses in the pelvis, (5) (expandable) prostheses in children and (6) long-term results of tumour endoprostheses. The topics of interest covered by the selected studies largely matched with the main research questions stated at a consensus meeting, with survival outcome of orthopaedic implants being the most commonly raised research question. As many studies reported on the risk of deep infections, research in the future should also focus on potential preventive methods in endoprosthetic tumour reconstruction. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:445-459. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180081 British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2019-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6667979/ /pubmed/31423328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.180081 Text en © 2019 The author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed.
spellingShingle Oncology
Smolle, Maria A.
Andreou, Dimosthenis
Tunn, Per-Ulf
Leithner, Andreas
Advances in tumour endoprostheses: a systematic review
title Advances in tumour endoprostheses: a systematic review
title_full Advances in tumour endoprostheses: a systematic review
title_fullStr Advances in tumour endoprostheses: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Advances in tumour endoprostheses: a systematic review
title_short Advances in tumour endoprostheses: a systematic review
title_sort advances in tumour endoprostheses: a systematic review
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6667979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31423328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.180081
work_keys_str_mv AT smollemariaa advancesintumourendoprosthesesasystematicreview
AT andreoudimosthenis advancesintumourendoprosthesesasystematicreview
AT tunnperulf advancesintumourendoprosthesesasystematicreview
AT leithnerandreas advancesintumourendoprosthesesasystematicreview