Cargando…

Current status of use of big data and artificial intelligence in RMDs: a systematic literature review informing EULAR recommendations

OBJECTIVE: To assess the current use of big data and artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs). METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed in PubMed MEDLINE in November 2018, with key words referring to big data, AI and RMDs. All original r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kedra, Joanna, Radstake, Timothy, Pandit, Aridaman, Baraliakos, Xenofon, Berenbaum, Francis, Finckh, Axel, Fautrel, Bruno, Stamm, Tanja A, Gomez-Cabrero, David, Pristipino, Christian, Choquet, Remy, Servy, Hervé, Stones, Simon, Burmester, Gerd, Gossec, Laure
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6668041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31413871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001004
_version_ 1783440142653980672
author Kedra, Joanna
Radstake, Timothy
Pandit, Aridaman
Baraliakos, Xenofon
Berenbaum, Francis
Finckh, Axel
Fautrel, Bruno
Stamm, Tanja A
Gomez-Cabrero, David
Pristipino, Christian
Choquet, Remy
Servy, Hervé
Stones, Simon
Burmester, Gerd
Gossec, Laure
author_facet Kedra, Joanna
Radstake, Timothy
Pandit, Aridaman
Baraliakos, Xenofon
Berenbaum, Francis
Finckh, Axel
Fautrel, Bruno
Stamm, Tanja A
Gomez-Cabrero, David
Pristipino, Christian
Choquet, Remy
Servy, Hervé
Stones, Simon
Burmester, Gerd
Gossec, Laure
author_sort Kedra, Joanna
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the current use of big data and artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs). METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed in PubMed MEDLINE in November 2018, with key words referring to big data, AI and RMDs. All original reports published in English were analysed. A mirror literature review was also performed outside of RMDs on the same number of articles. The number of data analysed, data sources and statistical methods used (traditional statistics, AI or both) were collected. The analysis compared findings within and beyond the field of RMDs. RESULTS: Of 567 articles relating to RMDs, 55 met the inclusion criteria and were analysed, as well as 55 articles in other medical fields. The mean number of data points was 746 million (range 2000–5 billion) in RMDs, and 9.1 billion (range 100 000–200 billion) outside of RMDs. Data sources were varied: in RMDs, 26 (47%) were clinical, 8 (15%) biological and 16 (29%) radiological. Both traditional and AI methods were used to analyse big data (respectively, 10 (18%) and 45 (82%) in RMDs and 8 (15%) and 47 (85%) out of RMDs). Machine learning represented 97% of AI methods in RMDs and among these methods, the most represented was artificial neural network (20/44 articles in RMDs). CONCLUSIONS: Big data sources and types are varied within the field of RMDs, and methods used to analyse big data were heterogeneous. These findings will inform a European League Against Rheumatism taskforce on big data in RMDs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6668041
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66680412019-08-14 Current status of use of big data and artificial intelligence in RMDs: a systematic literature review informing EULAR recommendations Kedra, Joanna Radstake, Timothy Pandit, Aridaman Baraliakos, Xenofon Berenbaum, Francis Finckh, Axel Fautrel, Bruno Stamm, Tanja A Gomez-Cabrero, David Pristipino, Christian Choquet, Remy Servy, Hervé Stones, Simon Burmester, Gerd Gossec, Laure RMD Open Epidemiology OBJECTIVE: To assess the current use of big data and artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs). METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed in PubMed MEDLINE in November 2018, with key words referring to big data, AI and RMDs. All original reports published in English were analysed. A mirror literature review was also performed outside of RMDs on the same number of articles. The number of data analysed, data sources and statistical methods used (traditional statistics, AI or both) were collected. The analysis compared findings within and beyond the field of RMDs. RESULTS: Of 567 articles relating to RMDs, 55 met the inclusion criteria and were analysed, as well as 55 articles in other medical fields. The mean number of data points was 746 million (range 2000–5 billion) in RMDs, and 9.1 billion (range 100 000–200 billion) outside of RMDs. Data sources were varied: in RMDs, 26 (47%) were clinical, 8 (15%) biological and 16 (29%) radiological. Both traditional and AI methods were used to analyse big data (respectively, 10 (18%) and 45 (82%) in RMDs and 8 (15%) and 47 (85%) out of RMDs). Machine learning represented 97% of AI methods in RMDs and among these methods, the most represented was artificial neural network (20/44 articles in RMDs). CONCLUSIONS: Big data sources and types are varied within the field of RMDs, and methods used to analyse big data were heterogeneous. These findings will inform a European League Against Rheumatism taskforce on big data in RMDs. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6668041/ /pubmed/31413871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001004 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Kedra, Joanna
Radstake, Timothy
Pandit, Aridaman
Baraliakos, Xenofon
Berenbaum, Francis
Finckh, Axel
Fautrel, Bruno
Stamm, Tanja A
Gomez-Cabrero, David
Pristipino, Christian
Choquet, Remy
Servy, Hervé
Stones, Simon
Burmester, Gerd
Gossec, Laure
Current status of use of big data and artificial intelligence in RMDs: a systematic literature review informing EULAR recommendations
title Current status of use of big data and artificial intelligence in RMDs: a systematic literature review informing EULAR recommendations
title_full Current status of use of big data and artificial intelligence in RMDs: a systematic literature review informing EULAR recommendations
title_fullStr Current status of use of big data and artificial intelligence in RMDs: a systematic literature review informing EULAR recommendations
title_full_unstemmed Current status of use of big data and artificial intelligence in RMDs: a systematic literature review informing EULAR recommendations
title_short Current status of use of big data and artificial intelligence in RMDs: a systematic literature review informing EULAR recommendations
title_sort current status of use of big data and artificial intelligence in rmds: a systematic literature review informing eular recommendations
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6668041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31413871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001004
work_keys_str_mv AT kedrajoanna currentstatusofuseofbigdataandartificialintelligenceinrmdsasystematicliteraturereviewinformingeularrecommendations
AT radstaketimothy currentstatusofuseofbigdataandartificialintelligenceinrmdsasystematicliteraturereviewinformingeularrecommendations
AT panditaridaman currentstatusofuseofbigdataandartificialintelligenceinrmdsasystematicliteraturereviewinformingeularrecommendations
AT baraliakosxenofon currentstatusofuseofbigdataandartificialintelligenceinrmdsasystematicliteraturereviewinformingeularrecommendations
AT berenbaumfrancis currentstatusofuseofbigdataandartificialintelligenceinrmdsasystematicliteraturereviewinformingeularrecommendations
AT finckhaxel currentstatusofuseofbigdataandartificialintelligenceinrmdsasystematicliteraturereviewinformingeularrecommendations
AT fautrelbruno currentstatusofuseofbigdataandartificialintelligenceinrmdsasystematicliteraturereviewinformingeularrecommendations
AT stammtanjaa currentstatusofuseofbigdataandartificialintelligenceinrmdsasystematicliteraturereviewinformingeularrecommendations
AT gomezcabrerodavid currentstatusofuseofbigdataandartificialintelligenceinrmdsasystematicliteraturereviewinformingeularrecommendations
AT pristipinochristian currentstatusofuseofbigdataandartificialintelligenceinrmdsasystematicliteraturereviewinformingeularrecommendations
AT choquetremy currentstatusofuseofbigdataandartificialintelligenceinrmdsasystematicliteraturereviewinformingeularrecommendations
AT servyherve currentstatusofuseofbigdataandartificialintelligenceinrmdsasystematicliteraturereviewinformingeularrecommendations
AT stonessimon currentstatusofuseofbigdataandartificialintelligenceinrmdsasystematicliteraturereviewinformingeularrecommendations
AT burmestergerd currentstatusofuseofbigdataandartificialintelligenceinrmdsasystematicliteraturereviewinformingeularrecommendations
AT gosseclaure currentstatusofuseofbigdataandartificialintelligenceinrmdsasystematicliteraturereviewinformingeularrecommendations