Cargando…
Evidence of commitment to research partnerships? Results of two web reviews
BACKGROUND: Partnerships between academic researchers and health system leadership are often promoted by health research funding agencies as an important strategy in helping ensure that funded research is relevant and the results used. While potential benefits of such partnerships have been identifi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6668137/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31362791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0475-5 |
_version_ | 1783440165066244096 |
---|---|
author | de Moissac, Danielle Bowen, Sarah Botting, Ingrid Graham, Ian D. MacLeod, Martha Harlos, Karen Songok, Charity Maritim Bohémier, Monique |
author_facet | de Moissac, Danielle Bowen, Sarah Botting, Ingrid Graham, Ian D. MacLeod, Martha Harlos, Karen Songok, Charity Maritim Bohémier, Monique |
author_sort | de Moissac, Danielle |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Partnerships between academic researchers and health system leadership are often promoted by health research funding agencies as an important strategy in helping ensure that funded research is relevant and the results used. While potential benefits of such partnerships have been identified, there is limited guidance in the scientific literature for either healthcare organisations or researchers on how to select, build and manage effective research partnerships. Our main research objective was to explore the health system perspective on partnerships with researchers with a focus on issues related to the design and organisation of the health system and services. Two structured web reviews were conducted as one component of this larger study. METHODS: Two separate structured web reviews were conducted using structured data extraction tools. The first review focused on sites of health research bodies and those providing information on health system management and knowledge translation (n = 38) to identify what guidance to support partnerships might be available on websites commonly accessed by health leaders and researchers. The second reviewed sites from all health ‘regions’ in Canada (n = 64) to determine what criteria and standards were currently used in guiding decisions to engage in research partnerships; phone follow-up ensured all relevant information was collected. RESULTS: Absence of guidance on partnerships between research institutions and health system leaders was found. In the first review, absence of guidance on research partnerships and knowledge coproduction was striking and in contrast with coverage of other forms of collaboration such as patient/community engagement. In the second review, little evidence of criteria and standards regarding research partnerships was found. Difficulties in finding appropriate contact information for those responsible for research and obtaining a response were commonly experienced. CONCLUSION: Guidance related to health system partnerships with academic researchers is lacking on websites that should promote and support such collaborations. Health region websites provide little evidence of partnership criteria and often do not make contact information to research leaders within health systems readily available; this may hinder partnership development between health systems and academia. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-019-0475-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6668137 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66681372019-08-05 Evidence of commitment to research partnerships? Results of two web reviews de Moissac, Danielle Bowen, Sarah Botting, Ingrid Graham, Ian D. MacLeod, Martha Harlos, Karen Songok, Charity Maritim Bohémier, Monique Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: Partnerships between academic researchers and health system leadership are often promoted by health research funding agencies as an important strategy in helping ensure that funded research is relevant and the results used. While potential benefits of such partnerships have been identified, there is limited guidance in the scientific literature for either healthcare organisations or researchers on how to select, build and manage effective research partnerships. Our main research objective was to explore the health system perspective on partnerships with researchers with a focus on issues related to the design and organisation of the health system and services. Two structured web reviews were conducted as one component of this larger study. METHODS: Two separate structured web reviews were conducted using structured data extraction tools. The first review focused on sites of health research bodies and those providing information on health system management and knowledge translation (n = 38) to identify what guidance to support partnerships might be available on websites commonly accessed by health leaders and researchers. The second reviewed sites from all health ‘regions’ in Canada (n = 64) to determine what criteria and standards were currently used in guiding decisions to engage in research partnerships; phone follow-up ensured all relevant information was collected. RESULTS: Absence of guidance on partnerships between research institutions and health system leaders was found. In the first review, absence of guidance on research partnerships and knowledge coproduction was striking and in contrast with coverage of other forms of collaboration such as patient/community engagement. In the second review, little evidence of criteria and standards regarding research partnerships was found. Difficulties in finding appropriate contact information for those responsible for research and obtaining a response were commonly experienced. CONCLUSION: Guidance related to health system partnerships with academic researchers is lacking on websites that should promote and support such collaborations. Health region websites provide little evidence of partnership criteria and often do not make contact information to research leaders within health systems readily available; this may hinder partnership development between health systems and academia. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-019-0475-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6668137/ /pubmed/31362791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0475-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research de Moissac, Danielle Bowen, Sarah Botting, Ingrid Graham, Ian D. MacLeod, Martha Harlos, Karen Songok, Charity Maritim Bohémier, Monique Evidence of commitment to research partnerships? Results of two web reviews |
title | Evidence of commitment to research partnerships? Results of two web reviews |
title_full | Evidence of commitment to research partnerships? Results of two web reviews |
title_fullStr | Evidence of commitment to research partnerships? Results of two web reviews |
title_full_unstemmed | Evidence of commitment to research partnerships? Results of two web reviews |
title_short | Evidence of commitment to research partnerships? Results of two web reviews |
title_sort | evidence of commitment to research partnerships? results of two web reviews |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6668137/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31362791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0475-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT demoissacdanielle evidenceofcommitmenttoresearchpartnershipsresultsoftwowebreviews AT bowensarah evidenceofcommitmenttoresearchpartnershipsresultsoftwowebreviews AT bottingingrid evidenceofcommitmenttoresearchpartnershipsresultsoftwowebreviews AT grahamiand evidenceofcommitmenttoresearchpartnershipsresultsoftwowebreviews AT macleodmartha evidenceofcommitmenttoresearchpartnershipsresultsoftwowebreviews AT harloskaren evidenceofcommitmenttoresearchpartnershipsresultsoftwowebreviews AT songokcharitymaritim evidenceofcommitmenttoresearchpartnershipsresultsoftwowebreviews AT bohemiermonique evidenceofcommitmenttoresearchpartnershipsresultsoftwowebreviews |