Cargando…

Evidence of commitment to research partnerships? Results of two web reviews

BACKGROUND: Partnerships between academic researchers and health system leadership are often promoted by health research funding agencies as an important strategy in helping ensure that funded research is relevant and the results used. While potential benefits of such partnerships have been identifi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Moissac, Danielle, Bowen, Sarah, Botting, Ingrid, Graham, Ian D., MacLeod, Martha, Harlos, Karen, Songok, Charity Maritim, Bohémier, Monique
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6668137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31362791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0475-5
_version_ 1783440165066244096
author de Moissac, Danielle
Bowen, Sarah
Botting, Ingrid
Graham, Ian D.
MacLeod, Martha
Harlos, Karen
Songok, Charity Maritim
Bohémier, Monique
author_facet de Moissac, Danielle
Bowen, Sarah
Botting, Ingrid
Graham, Ian D.
MacLeod, Martha
Harlos, Karen
Songok, Charity Maritim
Bohémier, Monique
author_sort de Moissac, Danielle
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Partnerships between academic researchers and health system leadership are often promoted by health research funding agencies as an important strategy in helping ensure that funded research is relevant and the results used. While potential benefits of such partnerships have been identified, there is limited guidance in the scientific literature for either healthcare organisations or researchers on how to select, build and manage effective research partnerships. Our main research objective was to explore the health system perspective on partnerships with researchers with a focus on issues related to the design and organisation of the health system and services. Two structured web reviews were conducted as one component of this larger study. METHODS: Two separate structured web reviews were conducted using structured data extraction tools. The first review focused on sites of health research bodies and those providing information on health system management and knowledge translation (n = 38) to identify what guidance to support partnerships might be available on websites commonly accessed by health leaders and researchers. The second reviewed sites from all health ‘regions’ in Canada (n = 64) to determine what criteria and standards were currently used in guiding decisions to engage in research partnerships; phone follow-up ensured all relevant information was collected. RESULTS: Absence of guidance on partnerships between research institutions and health system leaders was found. In the first review, absence of guidance on research partnerships and knowledge coproduction was striking and in contrast with coverage of other forms of collaboration such as patient/community engagement. In the second review, little evidence of criteria and standards regarding research partnerships was found. Difficulties in finding appropriate contact information for those responsible for research and obtaining a response were commonly experienced. CONCLUSION: Guidance related to health system partnerships with academic researchers is lacking on websites that should promote and support such collaborations. Health region websites provide little evidence of partnership criteria and often do not make contact information to research leaders within health systems readily available; this may hinder partnership development between health systems and academia. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-019-0475-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6668137
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66681372019-08-05 Evidence of commitment to research partnerships? Results of two web reviews de Moissac, Danielle Bowen, Sarah Botting, Ingrid Graham, Ian D. MacLeod, Martha Harlos, Karen Songok, Charity Maritim Bohémier, Monique Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: Partnerships between academic researchers and health system leadership are often promoted by health research funding agencies as an important strategy in helping ensure that funded research is relevant and the results used. While potential benefits of such partnerships have been identified, there is limited guidance in the scientific literature for either healthcare organisations or researchers on how to select, build and manage effective research partnerships. Our main research objective was to explore the health system perspective on partnerships with researchers with a focus on issues related to the design and organisation of the health system and services. Two structured web reviews were conducted as one component of this larger study. METHODS: Two separate structured web reviews were conducted using structured data extraction tools. The first review focused on sites of health research bodies and those providing information on health system management and knowledge translation (n = 38) to identify what guidance to support partnerships might be available on websites commonly accessed by health leaders and researchers. The second reviewed sites from all health ‘regions’ in Canada (n = 64) to determine what criteria and standards were currently used in guiding decisions to engage in research partnerships; phone follow-up ensured all relevant information was collected. RESULTS: Absence of guidance on partnerships between research institutions and health system leaders was found. In the first review, absence of guidance on research partnerships and knowledge coproduction was striking and in contrast with coverage of other forms of collaboration such as patient/community engagement. In the second review, little evidence of criteria and standards regarding research partnerships was found. Difficulties in finding appropriate contact information for those responsible for research and obtaining a response were commonly experienced. CONCLUSION: Guidance related to health system partnerships with academic researchers is lacking on websites that should promote and support such collaborations. Health region websites provide little evidence of partnership criteria and often do not make contact information to research leaders within health systems readily available; this may hinder partnership development between health systems and academia. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-019-0475-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6668137/ /pubmed/31362791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0475-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
de Moissac, Danielle
Bowen, Sarah
Botting, Ingrid
Graham, Ian D.
MacLeod, Martha
Harlos, Karen
Songok, Charity Maritim
Bohémier, Monique
Evidence of commitment to research partnerships? Results of two web reviews
title Evidence of commitment to research partnerships? Results of two web reviews
title_full Evidence of commitment to research partnerships? Results of two web reviews
title_fullStr Evidence of commitment to research partnerships? Results of two web reviews
title_full_unstemmed Evidence of commitment to research partnerships? Results of two web reviews
title_short Evidence of commitment to research partnerships? Results of two web reviews
title_sort evidence of commitment to research partnerships? results of two web reviews
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6668137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31362791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0475-5
work_keys_str_mv AT demoissacdanielle evidenceofcommitmenttoresearchpartnershipsresultsoftwowebreviews
AT bowensarah evidenceofcommitmenttoresearchpartnershipsresultsoftwowebreviews
AT bottingingrid evidenceofcommitmenttoresearchpartnershipsresultsoftwowebreviews
AT grahamiand evidenceofcommitmenttoresearchpartnershipsresultsoftwowebreviews
AT macleodmartha evidenceofcommitmenttoresearchpartnershipsresultsoftwowebreviews
AT harloskaren evidenceofcommitmenttoresearchpartnershipsresultsoftwowebreviews
AT songokcharitymaritim evidenceofcommitmenttoresearchpartnershipsresultsoftwowebreviews
AT bohemiermonique evidenceofcommitmenttoresearchpartnershipsresultsoftwowebreviews