Cargando…

Adjustment Effects of Maximum Intensity Tolerance During Whole-Body Electromyostimulation Training

Intensity regulation during whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) training is mostly controlled by subjective scales such as CR-10 Borg scale. To determine objective training intensities derived from a maximum as it is used in conventional strength training using the one-repetition-maximum (1-RM...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berger, Joshua, Becker, Stephan, Backfisch, Marco, Eifler, Christoph, Kemmler, Wolfgang, Fröhlich, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6668421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31396098
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00920
_version_ 1783440212863483904
author Berger, Joshua
Becker, Stephan
Backfisch, Marco
Eifler, Christoph
Kemmler, Wolfgang
Fröhlich, Michael
author_facet Berger, Joshua
Becker, Stephan
Backfisch, Marco
Eifler, Christoph
Kemmler, Wolfgang
Fröhlich, Michael
author_sort Berger, Joshua
collection PubMed
description Intensity regulation during whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) training is mostly controlled by subjective scales such as CR-10 Borg scale. To determine objective training intensities derived from a maximum as it is used in conventional strength training using the one-repetition-maximum (1-RM), a comparable maximum in WB-EMS is necessary. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine, if there is an individual maximum intensity tolerance plateau after multiple consecutive EMS application sessions. A total of 52 subjects (24.1 ± 3.2 years; 76.8 ± 11.1 kg; 1.77 ± 0.09 m) participated in the longitudinal, observational study (38 males, 14 females). Each participant carried out four consecutive maximal EMS applications (T1–T4) separated by 1 week. All muscle groups were stimulated successively until their individual maximum and combined to a whole-body stimulation index to carry out a possible statement for the development of the maximum intensity tolerance of the whole body. There was a significant main effect between the measurement times for all participants (p < 0.001; 𝜂(2) = 0.39) as well as gender specific for males (p = 0.001; 𝜂(2) = 0.18) and females (p < 0.001; 𝜂(2) = 0.57). There were no interaction effects of gender × measurement time (p = 0.394). The maximum intensity tolerance increased significantly from T1 to T2 (p = 0.001) and T2 to T3 (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between T3 and T4 (p = 1.0). These results indicate that there is an adjustment of the individual maximum intensity tolerance to a WB-EMS training after three consecutive tests. Therefore, there is a need of several habituation units comparable to the identification of the individual 1-RM in conventional strength training. Further research should focus on an objective intensity-specific regulation of the WB-EMS based on the individual maximum intensity tolerance to characterize different training areas and therefore generate specific adaptations to a WB-EMS training compared to conventional strength training methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6668421
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66684212019-08-08 Adjustment Effects of Maximum Intensity Tolerance During Whole-Body Electromyostimulation Training Berger, Joshua Becker, Stephan Backfisch, Marco Eifler, Christoph Kemmler, Wolfgang Fröhlich, Michael Front Physiol Physiology Intensity regulation during whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) training is mostly controlled by subjective scales such as CR-10 Borg scale. To determine objective training intensities derived from a maximum as it is used in conventional strength training using the one-repetition-maximum (1-RM), a comparable maximum in WB-EMS is necessary. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine, if there is an individual maximum intensity tolerance plateau after multiple consecutive EMS application sessions. A total of 52 subjects (24.1 ± 3.2 years; 76.8 ± 11.1 kg; 1.77 ± 0.09 m) participated in the longitudinal, observational study (38 males, 14 females). Each participant carried out four consecutive maximal EMS applications (T1–T4) separated by 1 week. All muscle groups were stimulated successively until their individual maximum and combined to a whole-body stimulation index to carry out a possible statement for the development of the maximum intensity tolerance of the whole body. There was a significant main effect between the measurement times for all participants (p < 0.001; 𝜂(2) = 0.39) as well as gender specific for males (p = 0.001; 𝜂(2) = 0.18) and females (p < 0.001; 𝜂(2) = 0.57). There were no interaction effects of gender × measurement time (p = 0.394). The maximum intensity tolerance increased significantly from T1 to T2 (p = 0.001) and T2 to T3 (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between T3 and T4 (p = 1.0). These results indicate that there is an adjustment of the individual maximum intensity tolerance to a WB-EMS training after three consecutive tests. Therefore, there is a need of several habituation units comparable to the identification of the individual 1-RM in conventional strength training. Further research should focus on an objective intensity-specific regulation of the WB-EMS based on the individual maximum intensity tolerance to characterize different training areas and therefore generate specific adaptations to a WB-EMS training compared to conventional strength training methods. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6668421/ /pubmed/31396098 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00920 Text en Copyright © 2019 Berger, Becker, Backfisch, Eifler, Kemmler and Fröhlich. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Berger, Joshua
Becker, Stephan
Backfisch, Marco
Eifler, Christoph
Kemmler, Wolfgang
Fröhlich, Michael
Adjustment Effects of Maximum Intensity Tolerance During Whole-Body Electromyostimulation Training
title Adjustment Effects of Maximum Intensity Tolerance During Whole-Body Electromyostimulation Training
title_full Adjustment Effects of Maximum Intensity Tolerance During Whole-Body Electromyostimulation Training
title_fullStr Adjustment Effects of Maximum Intensity Tolerance During Whole-Body Electromyostimulation Training
title_full_unstemmed Adjustment Effects of Maximum Intensity Tolerance During Whole-Body Electromyostimulation Training
title_short Adjustment Effects of Maximum Intensity Tolerance During Whole-Body Electromyostimulation Training
title_sort adjustment effects of maximum intensity tolerance during whole-body electromyostimulation training
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6668421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31396098
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00920
work_keys_str_mv AT bergerjoshua adjustmenteffectsofmaximumintensitytoleranceduringwholebodyelectromyostimulationtraining
AT beckerstephan adjustmenteffectsofmaximumintensitytoleranceduringwholebodyelectromyostimulationtraining
AT backfischmarco adjustmenteffectsofmaximumintensitytoleranceduringwholebodyelectromyostimulationtraining
AT eiflerchristoph adjustmenteffectsofmaximumintensitytoleranceduringwholebodyelectromyostimulationtraining
AT kemmlerwolfgang adjustmenteffectsofmaximumintensitytoleranceduringwholebodyelectromyostimulationtraining
AT frohlichmichael adjustmenteffectsofmaximumintensitytoleranceduringwholebodyelectromyostimulationtraining