Cargando…
Classification, History, and Future Prospects of Maxillofacial Prosthesis
This review presents a classification system for maxillofacial prostheses, while explaining its types. It also aims to describe their origin and development, currently available materials, and techniques, predicts the future requirements, and subsequently discusses its avenues for improvement as a r...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6668529/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31396279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8657619 |
_version_ | 1783440234295328768 |
---|---|
author | de Caxias, Fernanda Pereira dos Santos, Daniela Micheline Bannwart, Lisiane Cristina de Moraes Melo Neto, Clovis Lamartine Goiato, Marcelo Coelho |
author_facet | de Caxias, Fernanda Pereira dos Santos, Daniela Micheline Bannwart, Lisiane Cristina de Moraes Melo Neto, Clovis Lamartine Goiato, Marcelo Coelho |
author_sort | de Caxias, Fernanda Pereira |
collection | PubMed |
description | This review presents a classification system for maxillofacial prostheses, while explaining its types. It also aims to describe their origin and development, currently available materials, and techniques, predicts the future requirements, and subsequently discusses its avenues for improvement as a restorative modality. A literature search of the PubMed/Medline database was performed. Articles that discussed the history, types, materials, fabrication techniques, clinical implications, and future expectations related to maxillofacial prostheses and reconstruction were included. Fifty-nine articles were included in this review. Maxillofacial prostheses were classified as restorative or complementary with subclassifications based on the prostheses finality. The origin of maxillofacial prostheses is unclear; however, fabrication techniques and materials have undergone several changes throughout history. Currently, silicones and acrylic resins are the most commonly used materials to fabricate customized prostheses. Maxillofacial prostheses not only restore several types of orofacial defects but also improve the patients' quality of life. Although the current clinical scenario concerning the field of maxillofacial prostheses is promising, improvements in material quality and techniques for maxillofacial prostheses may be expected in the future, to produce better results in the treatment of patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6668529 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66685292019-08-08 Classification, History, and Future Prospects of Maxillofacial Prosthesis de Caxias, Fernanda Pereira dos Santos, Daniela Micheline Bannwart, Lisiane Cristina de Moraes Melo Neto, Clovis Lamartine Goiato, Marcelo Coelho Int J Dent Review Article This review presents a classification system for maxillofacial prostheses, while explaining its types. It also aims to describe their origin and development, currently available materials, and techniques, predicts the future requirements, and subsequently discusses its avenues for improvement as a restorative modality. A literature search of the PubMed/Medline database was performed. Articles that discussed the history, types, materials, fabrication techniques, clinical implications, and future expectations related to maxillofacial prostheses and reconstruction were included. Fifty-nine articles were included in this review. Maxillofacial prostheses were classified as restorative or complementary with subclassifications based on the prostheses finality. The origin of maxillofacial prostheses is unclear; however, fabrication techniques and materials have undergone several changes throughout history. Currently, silicones and acrylic resins are the most commonly used materials to fabricate customized prostheses. Maxillofacial prostheses not only restore several types of orofacial defects but also improve the patients' quality of life. Although the current clinical scenario concerning the field of maxillofacial prostheses is promising, improvements in material quality and techniques for maxillofacial prostheses may be expected in the future, to produce better results in the treatment of patients. Hindawi 2019-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6668529/ /pubmed/31396279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8657619 Text en Copyright © 2019 Fernanda Pereira de Caxias et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article de Caxias, Fernanda Pereira dos Santos, Daniela Micheline Bannwart, Lisiane Cristina de Moraes Melo Neto, Clovis Lamartine Goiato, Marcelo Coelho Classification, History, and Future Prospects of Maxillofacial Prosthesis |
title | Classification, History, and Future Prospects of Maxillofacial Prosthesis |
title_full | Classification, History, and Future Prospects of Maxillofacial Prosthesis |
title_fullStr | Classification, History, and Future Prospects of Maxillofacial Prosthesis |
title_full_unstemmed | Classification, History, and Future Prospects of Maxillofacial Prosthesis |
title_short | Classification, History, and Future Prospects of Maxillofacial Prosthesis |
title_sort | classification, history, and future prospects of maxillofacial prosthesis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6668529/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31396279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8657619 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT decaxiasfernandapereira classificationhistoryandfutureprospectsofmaxillofacialprosthesis AT dossantosdanielamicheline classificationhistoryandfutureprospectsofmaxillofacialprosthesis AT bannwartlisianecristina classificationhistoryandfutureprospectsofmaxillofacialprosthesis AT demoraesmelonetoclovislamartine classificationhistoryandfutureprospectsofmaxillofacialprosthesis AT goiatomarcelocoelho classificationhistoryandfutureprospectsofmaxillofacialprosthesis |