Cargando…

Classification, History, and Future Prospects of Maxillofacial Prosthesis

This review presents a classification system for maxillofacial prostheses, while explaining its types. It also aims to describe their origin and development, currently available materials, and techniques, predicts the future requirements, and subsequently discusses its avenues for improvement as a r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Caxias, Fernanda Pereira, dos Santos, Daniela Micheline, Bannwart, Lisiane Cristina, de Moraes Melo Neto, Clovis Lamartine, Goiato, Marcelo Coelho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6668529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31396279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8657619
_version_ 1783440234295328768
author de Caxias, Fernanda Pereira
dos Santos, Daniela Micheline
Bannwart, Lisiane Cristina
de Moraes Melo Neto, Clovis Lamartine
Goiato, Marcelo Coelho
author_facet de Caxias, Fernanda Pereira
dos Santos, Daniela Micheline
Bannwart, Lisiane Cristina
de Moraes Melo Neto, Clovis Lamartine
Goiato, Marcelo Coelho
author_sort de Caxias, Fernanda Pereira
collection PubMed
description This review presents a classification system for maxillofacial prostheses, while explaining its types. It also aims to describe their origin and development, currently available materials, and techniques, predicts the future requirements, and subsequently discusses its avenues for improvement as a restorative modality. A literature search of the PubMed/Medline database was performed. Articles that discussed the history, types, materials, fabrication techniques, clinical implications, and future expectations related to maxillofacial prostheses and reconstruction were included. Fifty-nine articles were included in this review. Maxillofacial prostheses were classified as restorative or complementary with subclassifications based on the prostheses finality. The origin of maxillofacial prostheses is unclear; however, fabrication techniques and materials have undergone several changes throughout history. Currently, silicones and acrylic resins are the most commonly used materials to fabricate customized prostheses. Maxillofacial prostheses not only restore several types of orofacial defects but also improve the patients' quality of life. Although the current clinical scenario concerning the field of maxillofacial prostheses is promising, improvements in material quality and techniques for maxillofacial prostheses may be expected in the future, to produce better results in the treatment of patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6668529
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66685292019-08-08 Classification, History, and Future Prospects of Maxillofacial Prosthesis de Caxias, Fernanda Pereira dos Santos, Daniela Micheline Bannwart, Lisiane Cristina de Moraes Melo Neto, Clovis Lamartine Goiato, Marcelo Coelho Int J Dent Review Article This review presents a classification system for maxillofacial prostheses, while explaining its types. It also aims to describe their origin and development, currently available materials, and techniques, predicts the future requirements, and subsequently discusses its avenues for improvement as a restorative modality. A literature search of the PubMed/Medline database was performed. Articles that discussed the history, types, materials, fabrication techniques, clinical implications, and future expectations related to maxillofacial prostheses and reconstruction were included. Fifty-nine articles were included in this review. Maxillofacial prostheses were classified as restorative or complementary with subclassifications based on the prostheses finality. The origin of maxillofacial prostheses is unclear; however, fabrication techniques and materials have undergone several changes throughout history. Currently, silicones and acrylic resins are the most commonly used materials to fabricate customized prostheses. Maxillofacial prostheses not only restore several types of orofacial defects but also improve the patients' quality of life. Although the current clinical scenario concerning the field of maxillofacial prostheses is promising, improvements in material quality and techniques for maxillofacial prostheses may be expected in the future, to produce better results in the treatment of patients. Hindawi 2019-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6668529/ /pubmed/31396279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8657619 Text en Copyright © 2019 Fernanda Pereira de Caxias et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
de Caxias, Fernanda Pereira
dos Santos, Daniela Micheline
Bannwart, Lisiane Cristina
de Moraes Melo Neto, Clovis Lamartine
Goiato, Marcelo Coelho
Classification, History, and Future Prospects of Maxillofacial Prosthesis
title Classification, History, and Future Prospects of Maxillofacial Prosthesis
title_full Classification, History, and Future Prospects of Maxillofacial Prosthesis
title_fullStr Classification, History, and Future Prospects of Maxillofacial Prosthesis
title_full_unstemmed Classification, History, and Future Prospects of Maxillofacial Prosthesis
title_short Classification, History, and Future Prospects of Maxillofacial Prosthesis
title_sort classification, history, and future prospects of maxillofacial prosthesis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6668529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31396279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8657619
work_keys_str_mv AT decaxiasfernandapereira classificationhistoryandfutureprospectsofmaxillofacialprosthesis
AT dossantosdanielamicheline classificationhistoryandfutureprospectsofmaxillofacialprosthesis
AT bannwartlisianecristina classificationhistoryandfutureprospectsofmaxillofacialprosthesis
AT demoraesmelonetoclovislamartine classificationhistoryandfutureprospectsofmaxillofacialprosthesis
AT goiatomarcelocoelho classificationhistoryandfutureprospectsofmaxillofacialprosthesis