Cargando…

Diagnostic Sensitivity of Different Reference Bodies When Using Scheimpflug Tomography in a Myopic Population with Keratoconus

PURPOSE: To establish which reference body offers the greatest sensitivity in keratoconus (KC) diagnosis, obtain normative data for the myopic population with toric ellipsoid reference bodies, and determine the cutoff points for a population with KC. METHODS: A retrospective, observational study of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garcerant, Daniel, Jiménez-Alfaro, Ignacio, Alejandre, Nicolás
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6668563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31396409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2593404
_version_ 1783440242355732480
author Garcerant, Daniel
Jiménez-Alfaro, Ignacio
Alejandre, Nicolás
author_facet Garcerant, Daniel
Jiménez-Alfaro, Ignacio
Alejandre, Nicolás
author_sort Garcerant, Daniel
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To establish which reference body offers the greatest sensitivity in keratoconus (KC) diagnosis, obtain normative data for the myopic population with toric ellipsoid reference bodies, and determine the cutoff points for a population with KC. METHODS: A retrospective, observational study of the entire Scheimpflug tomographer database of the Fundación Jiménez Díaz in Madrid was conducted to identify a normal myopic and a KC myopic population. Three different reference bodies were tested on all patients: best fit sphere (BFS), best fit toric ellipsoid with fixed eccentricity (BFTEFE), and best fit toric ellipsoid (BFTE). Anterior and posterior elevation measurements at the apex and thinnest point were recorded, as well as the root mean square of posterior elevations (RMS-P). Normative data were extracted, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to obtain cutoff points between the normal and KC population. RESULTS: A total of 301 eyes were included, comprising 219 normal myopic and 82 myopic KC eyes. BFS and BFTEFE produced the best results when measuring posterior elevation at the thinnest point. BFTE had better sensitivity with the RMS-P. From all measurements, best sensitivity (100%) was achieved with a cutoff point of 8 μm of posterior elevation at the thinnest point using the BFTEFE. BFTE was found to hide the cone in certain patients. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior elevation measured at the thinnest point with a BFTEFE is the best-performing parameter and, therefore, is recommended to discriminate between normal and KC patients within a myopic population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6668563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66685632019-08-08 Diagnostic Sensitivity of Different Reference Bodies When Using Scheimpflug Tomography in a Myopic Population with Keratoconus Garcerant, Daniel Jiménez-Alfaro, Ignacio Alejandre, Nicolás J Ophthalmol Research Article PURPOSE: To establish which reference body offers the greatest sensitivity in keratoconus (KC) diagnosis, obtain normative data for the myopic population with toric ellipsoid reference bodies, and determine the cutoff points for a population with KC. METHODS: A retrospective, observational study of the entire Scheimpflug tomographer database of the Fundación Jiménez Díaz in Madrid was conducted to identify a normal myopic and a KC myopic population. Three different reference bodies were tested on all patients: best fit sphere (BFS), best fit toric ellipsoid with fixed eccentricity (BFTEFE), and best fit toric ellipsoid (BFTE). Anterior and posterior elevation measurements at the apex and thinnest point were recorded, as well as the root mean square of posterior elevations (RMS-P). Normative data were extracted, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to obtain cutoff points between the normal and KC population. RESULTS: A total of 301 eyes were included, comprising 219 normal myopic and 82 myopic KC eyes. BFS and BFTEFE produced the best results when measuring posterior elevation at the thinnest point. BFTE had better sensitivity with the RMS-P. From all measurements, best sensitivity (100%) was achieved with a cutoff point of 8 μm of posterior elevation at the thinnest point using the BFTEFE. BFTE was found to hide the cone in certain patients. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior elevation measured at the thinnest point with a BFTEFE is the best-performing parameter and, therefore, is recommended to discriminate between normal and KC patients within a myopic population. Hindawi 2019-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6668563/ /pubmed/31396409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2593404 Text en Copyright © 2019 Daniel Garcerant et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Garcerant, Daniel
Jiménez-Alfaro, Ignacio
Alejandre, Nicolás
Diagnostic Sensitivity of Different Reference Bodies When Using Scheimpflug Tomography in a Myopic Population with Keratoconus
title Diagnostic Sensitivity of Different Reference Bodies When Using Scheimpflug Tomography in a Myopic Population with Keratoconus
title_full Diagnostic Sensitivity of Different Reference Bodies When Using Scheimpflug Tomography in a Myopic Population with Keratoconus
title_fullStr Diagnostic Sensitivity of Different Reference Bodies When Using Scheimpflug Tomography in a Myopic Population with Keratoconus
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Sensitivity of Different Reference Bodies When Using Scheimpflug Tomography in a Myopic Population with Keratoconus
title_short Diagnostic Sensitivity of Different Reference Bodies When Using Scheimpflug Tomography in a Myopic Population with Keratoconus
title_sort diagnostic sensitivity of different reference bodies when using scheimpflug tomography in a myopic population with keratoconus
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6668563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31396409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2593404
work_keys_str_mv AT garcerantdaniel diagnosticsensitivityofdifferentreferencebodieswhenusingscheimpflugtomographyinamyopicpopulationwithkeratoconus
AT jimenezalfaroignacio diagnosticsensitivityofdifferentreferencebodieswhenusingscheimpflugtomographyinamyopicpopulationwithkeratoconus
AT alejandrenicolas diagnosticsensitivityofdifferentreferencebodieswhenusingscheimpflugtomographyinamyopicpopulationwithkeratoconus